Operation Warp Speed, Industrial Policy, and the Truth | Eastern NC Now

Scott Lincicome writes at National Review Online to dispel myths involving Operation Warp Speed.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Scott Lincicome writes at National Review Online to dispel myths involving Operation Warp Speed.

  • As President Biden picks up the "industrial policy" baton from Donald Trump, it has become accepted wisdom that "Operation Warp Speed" (OWS) shows how such policy can surmount "market failures" to achieve major national objectives. The Biden administration's new report on "critical supply chains," for example, uses OWS to justify its industrial-policy proposals, and in doing so links to work calling OWS "a triumph and validation of industrial policy." And Senator Marco Rubio echoed this conclusion a few weeks earlier, when he claimed on Twitter that "the free market would have eventually developed a vaccine, but we would all still be wearing masks without Operation Warp Speed."
  • This potted, bipartisan history, however, omits crucial facts that turn OWS from a clear "industrial-policy success" to, at best, a useful complement to incredible private-sector efforts and, at worst, a cautionary tale of how industrial policy can impede such efforts.
  • To be clear, OWS undoubtedly subsidized the production of several successful COVID-19 vaccines in a remarkably short period of time. But those claiming OWS drove that success must contend with several uncomfortable facts.
  • First of all, the BioNTech/Pfizer shot - the first vaccine to market and the most successful - was created and produced outside of OWS. BioNTech is a German company, and it had been working on mRNA vaccines for years when it announced its partnership with Pfizer in March 2020, two months before OWS got off the ground. In April 2020, still one month before OWS began, Pfizer's management predicted that it would distribute millions of finished doses by the end of the year. ...
  • ... Pfizer and BioNTech also refused government funding for initial R&D, testing, and production support out of fear that it would politicize or delay their work. Instead, they leveraged Pfizer's resources, multinational research teams, global capital markets and supply chains, and a logistics-and-transportation infrastructure developed over decades.

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )



Comment

( August 27th, 2021 @ 7:23 pm )
 
None of the "vaccines" are safe.....period. Why would people take something and not know what's in it? Operation Warp Speed has nothing to do with you think it does.


People need to wake up!



Democrats’ N.C. Supreme Court majority on the line with two seats up in ’22 John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Bladen Journal Takes the Dufresne Refrain to COVID


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

massive data collection by license plate readers on highways and streets threaten freedom
“I’m from America, 250 years ago we were way bigger than 6/1 dogs, and look at us thriving now.” Justin Gaethje pulls off an all time sports upset.
There are many people who overlook the brilliance of the US Constitution. They argue that it is outdated and unfit to adequately govern such a modern nation as ours in the 21st century.

HbAD1

"I plan to keep his counsel close until our paths cross again," JD Vance said on Thursday.

HbAD2

On Tuesday, Democratic Gov. Josh Stein signed an executive order creating the bipartisan Health Care Affordability Commission that he said will look at ways to make healthcare more affordable for North Carolinians.
"Margo’s Got Money Troubles" explores how financial desperation drives women to OnlyFans. That’s not empowering. It’s exploitative.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top