Did You Know? The Negative Effects of Affirmative Action on Minority Students | Eastern North Carolina Now

Affirmative action policies aim to increase the representation of minorities in higher education.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of The James G. Martin Center. The author of this post is Sevan Gulleyan.

    Affirmative action policies aim to increase the representation of minorities in higher education. Some, however, have objected to these policies and argue students should be admitted based on academic merit, not based on race.

    And evidence suggests that race-based admissions policies negatively affect minority students.

    In a 2013 article entitled "The Sad Irony of Affirmative Action," Gail Heriot argues that affirmative action has "backfired." According to Herriot,

  • ... [O]ne consequence of widespread race-preferential policies is that minority students tend to enroll in colleges and universities where their entering academic credentials put them toward the bottom of the class... When the most prestigious schools relax their admissions policies in order to admit more minority students, they start a chain reaction, resulting in a substantial credentials gap at nearly all selective schools.

    And according to Stephen Cole and Elinor Barber, authors of the book "Increasing Faculty Diversity: The Occupational Choices of High-Achieving Minority Students,"

  • It is a fact that in virtually all selective schools...where racial preferences in admission is practiced, the majority of African American students end up in the lower quarter of their class.

    In 2009, the University of Texas, which practiced race-preferential admissions, had the following SAT scores and GPAs based on race:

  • Asian students had an SAT score of 1991 (out of 2400) and a GPA of 3.07 (out of 4.0)
  • White students had an SAT score of 1914, a GPA of 3.04
  • Hispanic students had an SAT score of 1794, a GPA of 2.83
  • African-American students had an SAT score of 1524, a GPA of 2.57

    This raises the question, do Americans even want their race or ethnicity to be a factor in college admissions?

    Many say no. According to a 2019 study done at the Pew Research center, nearly three-fourths (73 percent) of a representative sample of Americans said that race or ethnicity should not be a factor.

    Another 2016 polling showed that 70 percent of Americans believe colleges should base admissions solely on merit. The study found that 26 percent of the Americans surveyed saw an importance in taking race and ethnicity into account for diversity purposes.

    So far, there are nine states that have banned affirmative action:

  • California (1996)
  • Washington (1998)
  • Florida (1999)
  • Michigan (2006)
  • Nebraska (2008)
  • Arizona (2010)
  • New Hampshire (2012)
  • Oklahoma (2012)
  • Idaho (2020)

    Recently, the North Carolina legislature introduced a bill that would similarly ban affirmative action.

    Sevan Gulleyan is a junior at NC State University majoring in political science and is a Martin Center intern.
Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

would allow civil lawsuit against judge if released criminal causes harm
"This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter narco-terror operations."
Charlie Kirk, 31 years of age, who was renowned as one of the most important and influential college speakers /Leaders in many decades; founder of Turning Point USA, has been shot dead at Utah Valley University.
The Trump administration took actions against Harvard related to the anti-Israel protests that roiled its campus.
In remembrance of the day that will forever seer the concept of 'evil' in our minds, let's look back at that fateful morning, exactly 11 years ago today to that series of horrific events which unfolded before our unbelieving eyes......

HbAD1

faced 25 years in prison for "misgendering" a leftie tranny politician
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD2

 
Back to Top