U.S. Women’s Soccer ‘Equal Pay’ Agreement Includes Men’s Team Now Subsidizing Their Pay | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Ashe Schow.

    In what is being called an "equal pay" agreement between the U.S. Soccer Federation and the U.S. men's and women's national teams, the men's team will soon begin subsidizing the women's team's bonuses with their own international prize money.

    The landmark agreement was reached after years litigation between U.S. Soccer and members of the U.S. Women's National Team (USWNT), who claimed they were unfairly paid differently than the U.S. Men's National Team (USMNT). The women made this claim even though each team had their own separate collective bargaining agreement about their pay structure.

    To achieve "equal pay," according to The New York Times, "U.S. Soccer will distribute millions of extra dollars to its best players through a complicated calculus of increased match bonuses, pooled prize money and new revenue-sharing agreements that will give each team a slice of the tens of millions of dollars in commercial revenues that U.S. Soccer receives each year from sponsors, broadcasters and other partners."

    According to the new agreement, U.S. Soccer will play each player $18,000 for most matches and up to $24,000 for wins at certain major tournaments. Top players may also receive more. U.S. Soccer also said it would give upward of 90% of the money it receives from FIFA for World Cup competitions and split that money between the men's and women's players, which could "result in a shared prize pool of more than $20 million as soon as next year," the Times reported.

    Most of that revenue comes from the men's team's World Cup revenue, The Daily Wire previously reported. The women's soccer team brings in less money because it has fewer viewers than men's soccer overall. This changes when the women's team makes it to the World Cup, something the U.S. Men's team hasn't done.

    The Washington Post reported in 2019 that "Overall, from fiscal 2016 to 2018, the women's games generated about $900,000 more revenue than the men's games. In the year following the 2015 World Cup win, women's games generated $1.9 million more than the men's games." The outlet noted, however, that the calculation leaves out fiscal 2015, which included a men's World Cup cycle. Extending the calculation to include the men's World Cup cycle and the women's World Cup, the men's team brought in $10.8 million more for U.S. Soccer, the federation told the Post.

    But the revenue question is more complicated than that, the Post reported. While the men may have brought in more gross revenue, their net revenue was less than the women's team, due to a number of factors such as salaries, bonuses, and expenses changing in recent years.

    Prior to the new agreement, the women's team received a higher percentage of revenue than the men's team, though the revenue is lower. CBS reported in 2015 that the men's team received 9% of the revenue generated by the 2010 World Cup - which amounted to $348 million. The women's team received 13% of the 2015 World Cup revenue, but because the women's team brought in less revenue, they only received $10 million. Now the women's team will get some of the hundreds of millions of dollars that men's team brings in World Cup revenue.

    The women's team also received a base salary and benefits, which the men's team did not.

    U.S. Soccer President Cindy Parlow Cone told the Times that the new contracts would affect the larger mission of the organization.

    "There's no denying that money that we have to pay our national teams is money that's not reinvested in the game," he told the outlet. "And people can take that perspective. But the way I look at it is that our job is to try to figure out how all three groups can work together to grow the pie so that everyone is benefiting."

    The Daily Wire is one of America's fastest growing conservative media companies for breaking news, investigative reporting, sports, podcasts, in-depth analysis, books, and entertainment for a reason: because we believe in what we do. We believe in our country, in the value of truth and the freedom to speak it, and in the right to challenge tyranny wherever we see it. Believe the same? Become a member now and join our mission.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Five congressional primary winners have reasons to thank 2017 N.C. law Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Panic: Even Dems’ Internal Polling Shows Huge Swing For House GOP In 2022


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.
Democrats prosecuting political opponets just like foreign dictrators do
populist / nationalist / sovereigntist right are kingmakers for new government
18 year old boy who thinks he is girl planned to shoot up elementary school in Maryland
Biden assault on democracy continues to build as he ramps up dictatorship
One would think that the former Attorney General would have known better

HbAD1

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
UNC board committee votes unanimously to end DEI in UNC system
Police in the nation’s capital are not stopping illegal aliens who are driving around without license plates, according to a new report.
Davidaon County student suspended for using correct legal term for those in country illegally

HbAD2

Lawmakers and privacy experts on both sides of the political spectrum are sounding the alarm on a provision in a spy powers reform bill that one senator described as one of the “most terrifying expansions of government surveillance” in history

HbAD3

 
Back to Top