Voter ID opponents seek expedited N.C. Supreme Court review | Eastern North Carolina Now | Opponents of North Carolina's voter ID law urge the N.C. Supreme Court to hear the case as early as September.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    Opponents of North Carolina's photo voter identification law urge the N.C. Supreme Court to consider their lawsuit as early as September. They filed a motion Monday for an expedited hearing.

    "Timely resolution of this matter is necessary to allow the State and its voters to prepare for future elections without the risk of voter confusion and disenfranchisement," according to the motion from attorney Jeffrey Loperfido of the Southern Coalition for Social Justice. The coalition represents plaintiffs challenging the state's 2018 voter ID law. The case is called Holmes v. Moore.

    "It has now been more than three years since S.B. 824 [the voter ID law] was enacted," the motion added. "And the legislature's inability thus far to craft a voter ID law that does not intentionally discriminate against African American voters has resulted in nearly 10 years of confusing, on-again-off-again messaging to voters and election officials alike. ... North Carolina's voters and election officials deserve the certainty that only this Court's review can provide."

    "[I]n light of the recent release of the Supreme Court's Calendar of Arguments for August, Plaintiffs-Appellees request that the Court schedule this matter for oral argument at the earliest possible date, either in a special session scheduled for September or, in the alternative, as part of the October oral argument calendar," Loperfido wrote.

    The motion acknowledges that legislative leaders oppose an expedited review. State government lawyers representing the N.C. State Board of Elections "take no position" on the motion, according to Loperfido.

    With a 2-1 vote, a trial court panel threw out North Carolina's voter ID law in September 2021. Unless that ruling is overturned, North Carolina cannot move forward with a photo ID requirement.

    Voter ID defenders appealed the trial court's ruling to the N.C. Court of Appeals, but ID critics then asked the state Supreme Court to intervene.

    Legislative leaders accused ID opponents of "forum shopping" based on the contrasting partisan compositions of the two appellate courts. Republicans outnumber Democrats, 10-5, on the Appeals Court. Democrats outnumber Republicans, 4-3, on the state Supreme Court. Two Supreme Court seats now held by Democrats are up for grabs in the November election.

    The state's highest court agreed on March 2 to take the voter ID case. No date has been announced for oral arguments.

    Holmes v. Moore represents one of three active legal challenges involving voter ID. The state Supreme Court already has heard oral arguments in N.C. NAACP v. Berger. That case challenges a voter-approved amendment enshrining photo ID into the N.C. Constitution. Opponents argue that an illegally gerrymandered General Assembly had no authority to place the ID amendment on the ballot. That case provided the content for season one of the "Extreme Injustice" podcast, available at ExtremeInjustice.com.

    North Carolinians approved voter ID with 55% of the ballots cast in a statewide November 2018 constitutional referendum. The General Assembly approved its law implementing the voter ID amendment the following month.

    North Carolina's voter ID law also faces a challenge in federal court. In an 8-1 ruling issued in June, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state legislative leaders had the right to intervene in the federal case to defend voter ID. Originally scheduled for trial in January, that federal case has not yet been rescheduled.
Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

misnamed "inflation reduction act" to raise middle class taxes
will they bring down the Rutte government?
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki responded to news reports from over the weekend that indicated that China had developed advanced nuclear-capable weapons systems by saying that the Biden administration “welcome[s] stiff competition.”
In an unprecedented move to protect the safety and security of millions of Americans, the FBI has added itself to the FBI watchlist.
state has started work to plug 1,000 foot gap in Yuma sector
On Monday the U.S. Supreme Court certified a June 30 ruling that would allow the Biden Administration to end former President Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” border policy.
Have you heard the latest? Uncle Joe is attempting to appropriate billions of dollars to a program designed to mandate that CRT is taught across the nation in OUR public schools.
Terrorism experts quickly downplayed Democrat President Joe Biden‘s attempts to count the CIA’s killing of Al Qaeda Ayman Al-Zawahiri in Afghanistan as a win for his administration, noting the fact that Al-Zawahiri was in Afghanistan at all means that the terrorist group has returned to the country
On July 8, Judge William Osteen, a federal judge appointed by President George W. Bush, gave all sides in the Bryant v. Woodall case 30 days to return briefs to the court on whether the injunction blocking North Carolina’s 20-week abortion ban should be lifted.

HbAD1

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki downplayed a video from over the weekend that showed President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden violating a mask mandate in Washington, D.C., by saying that everyone has “moments” when they don’t put their masks back on as quickly as they should.
Simply put, the idiocy of Common Core Math is at the core of the Leftist's Orwellian ("1984") disposition to convert our Constitutional Republic into a Marxist Hellhole.
Joe Biden’s approval ratings through the first six quarters of his presidency have fallen to the lowest level of any president on record, according to one top pollster.
Amid mounting accusations of attempting to intimidate former President Trump from running for re-election in 2024, Attorney General Merrick Garland explained today that when the FBI was tipped off about a school board protest at Mar-A-Lago, they mobilized without delay
Republican Georgia Senate candidate Herschel Walker promised Monday to pray for the MSNBC contributor who suggested he was one of the “negroes” who would do what Republicans wanted him to do.
Over the last week, the News & Observer and EdNC published articles about a modification to the principal compensation system included in this year’s state budget.
Facebook warned on Monday that there is a coordinated campaign to damage the company involving dozens of journalists who reportedly had to agree to conditions laid out by a PR team in order to gain access to internal documents that were taken from the company.
Some Biden administration officials in the U.S. Justice Department slammed the FBI’s raid on Mar-a-Lago this week, saying that the situation backfired big time and the bureau ended up creating the very situation that it sought to avoid.
The conservative Judicial Crisis Network (JCN) has released a new ad targeting Attorney General Merrick Garland as part of a massive $10 million campaign on “how Democrats are endangering the lives of Supreme Court justices.”

HbAD2

 
Back to Top