Legislative leaders argue against N.C. congressional map, continue plea to drop their appeal | Eastern North Carolina Now | Top N.C. legislative leaders have filed arguments against a court-imposed congressional map, even though they want to drop their appeal against the map.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    State legislative leaders have met an Aug. 1 deadline to submit complaints about North Carolina's congressional election map to the N.C. Supreme Court. At the same time, those legislative leaders still seek to drop their appeal challenging the court-imposed map.

    Lawmakers filed paperwork July 13 asking the Supreme Court to dismiss the appeal. Plaintiffs in the Harper v. Hall redistricting case objected to that request. The court has not addressed the issue.

    "As a result of not having heard from this Court as to the pending motion to dismiss, Legislative Defendants are filing their Appellants Brief contemporaneously with this Notice, but do not intend such filing to be a waiver of their Motion to Dismiss," wrote attorney Phillip Strach on Monday. Strach represents top legislative leaders. "To the contrary, should this Court grant Legislative Defendants' Motion to Dismiss then Legislative Defendants request that the Clerk's office strike Legislative Defendants' Appellants Brief from the docket as a part of this Court's ruling on the Motion to Dismiss."

    The appellants' brief sets out the legislators' arguments against a trial court imposing its own map for 2022 congressional elections. Trial judges adopted that map drawn by three outside appointed "special masters" after rejecting a map drawn by the Republican-led General Assembly.

    "The superior court failed to exclude conflicted experts and relied on incompetent evidence to support its erroneous findings that the remedial congressional plan passed by the General Assembly failed to meet this [Supreme] Court's standards for measuring partisan bias," Strach wrote. "In concluding that a different plan - a plan of its own making - was necessary for the 2022 elections of North Carolina's congressional representatives, the superior court failed to show necessary deference to the Legislature and infringed on the lawmaking process. This Court should reverse the superior court's determination that the General Assembly's remedial congressional plan was unconstitutional."

    Even if the state Supreme Court agrees to dismiss lawmakers' appeal, the legal dispute over North Carolina's congressional map will continue. The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider the issue in a separate case this fall called Moore v. Harper.

    The congressional map is one of three up for consideration by the state Supreme Court in October. If justices agree to drop the appeal related to the congressional map, they will hear arguments from the legislature's critics against maps for state House and Senate races.

    In a 4-3 party-line split, the court's four Democratic justices agreed last week to speed up the timeline for considering the case. The court will hear oral arguments at some point between Oct. 3 and Oct. 18. At the same time that justices agreed to an expedited review, the court declined to rule on lawmakers' request to have their appeal dismissed.

    Those decisions prompted a dissent from Republican Justice Tamara Barringer, who argued that there was no reason to expedite the case while also ignoring lawmakers' request.

    "The majority's decision ... lacks any jurisprudential support," Barringer wrote. "It reeks of judicial activism and should deeply trouble every citizen of this state."

    "Given the absence of any identifiable jurisprudential reason, the majority's decision today appears to reflect deeper partisan biases that have no place in a judiciary dedicated to the impartial administration of justice and the rule of law," Barringer added.
Go Back


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

misnamed "inflation reduction act" to raise middle class taxes
will they bring down the Rutte government?
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki responded to news reports from over the weekend that indicated that China had developed advanced nuclear-capable weapons systems by saying that the Biden administration “welcome[s] stiff competition.”
In an unprecedented move to protect the safety and security of millions of Americans, the FBI has added itself to the FBI watchlist.
state has started work to plug 1,000 foot gap in Yuma sector
On Monday the U.S. Supreme Court certified a June 30 ruling that would allow the Biden Administration to end former President Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” border policy.
Have you heard the latest? Uncle Joe is attempting to appropriate billions of dollars to a program designed to mandate that CRT is taught across the nation in OUR public schools.
Terrorism experts quickly downplayed Democrat President Joe Biden‘s attempts to count the CIA’s killing of Al Qaeda Ayman Al-Zawahiri in Afghanistan as a win for his administration, noting the fact that Al-Zawahiri was in Afghanistan at all means that the terrorist group has returned to the country
On July 8, Judge William Osteen, a federal judge appointed by President George W. Bush, gave all sides in the Bryant v. Woodall case 30 days to return briefs to the court on whether the injunction blocking North Carolina’s 20-week abortion ban should be lifted.


White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki downplayed a video from over the weekend that showed President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden violating a mask mandate in Washington, D.C., by saying that everyone has “moments” when they don’t put their masks back on as quickly as they should.
Simply put, the idiocy of Common Core Math is at the core of the Leftist's Orwellian ("1984") disposition to convert our Constitutional Republic into a Marxist Hellhole.
Joe Biden’s approval ratings through the first six quarters of his presidency have fallen to the lowest level of any president on record, according to one top pollster.
Amid mounting accusations of attempting to intimidate former President Trump from running for re-election in 2024, Attorney General Merrick Garland explained today that when the FBI was tipped off about a school board protest at Mar-A-Lago, they mobilized without delay
Republican Georgia Senate candidate Herschel Walker promised Monday to pray for the MSNBC contributor who suggested he was one of the “negroes” who would do what Republicans wanted him to do.
Over the last week, the News & Observer and EdNC published articles about a modification to the principal compensation system included in this year’s state budget.
Facebook warned on Monday that there is a coordinated campaign to damage the company involving dozens of journalists who reportedly had to agree to conditions laid out by a PR team in order to gain access to internal documents that were taken from the company.
Some Biden administration officials in the U.S. Justice Department slammed the FBI’s raid on Mar-a-Lago this week, saying that the situation backfired big time and the bureau ended up creating the very situation that it sought to avoid.
The conservative Judicial Crisis Network (JCN) has released a new ad targeting Attorney General Merrick Garland as part of a massive $10 million campaign on “how Democrats are endangering the lives of Supreme Court justices.”


Back to Top