Berger, Earls reject recusal requests in Leandro education funding case | Eastern North Carolina Now | N.C. Supreme Court Justices Phil Berger Jr. and Anita Earls have turned down requests that they recuse themselves from the Leandro education funding case.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    All seven N.C. Supreme Court justices will take part in this month's oral arguments in the Leandro school funding case. Justices Phil Berger Jr. and Anita Earls both announced Friday that they are rejecting requests that they recuse themselves from the case.

    Plaintiffs had targeted Berger because his father serves as the top officer in the N.C. Senate. In that role, Sen. Phil Berger is intervening in the case.

    "Pursuant to an administrative order entered by this Court on December 23, 2021, and having reviewed and considered precedent established by this Court, N.C.G.S. § 1-72.2, N.C.G.S. § 120-32.6, the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct, and the arguments of the parties, plaintiffs' motion and suggestion of recusal is denied," Berger Jr. wrote Friday in a one-sentence order.

    The Dec. 23, 2021, order confirmed that state Supreme Court justices can decide on their own whether to take part in deliberations and decisions about particular cases. That order followed months of speculation that Berger and Justice Tamara Barringer, both Republicans, might be forcibly removed from a different case by a vote of their colleagues. Carolina Journal reported on the controversy at Season One of the "Extreme Injustice" podcast dealt with the controversy surrounding the potential forced removal of justices.

    In the Leandro case, Earls released eight pages of commentary Friday. She explained her decision to deny a recusal request from legislative leaders. They had cited concerns about Earls' previous work representing intervening plaintiffs in the case. Lawmakers also referenced Earls' filing of a friend-of-the-court, or amicus, brief supporting plaintiffs.

    "I conclude that grounds do not exist for me to disqualify myself from hearing and deciding the issues presented," Earls wrote.

    "[T]he matter in which I did appear seventeen years ago as one of several attorneys representing intervenors was severed from the underlying case and is not at issue in this appeal," she wrote.

    "I filed an amicus brief on behalf of the civil rights organization I was leading a decade ago," Earls added. "Just as a jurist's prior career as a prosecutor is not understood to undermine their capacity to preside impartially in cases involving the State or defendants prosecuted by their office, it would be a disservice to the judiciary and to the people of North Carolina to conclude that my prior career as a civil rights attorney precludes me from acting impartially in cases involving civil rights matters."

    The Leandro case, officially titled Hoke County Board of Education v. State, dates back to 1994. The state Supreme Court already has produced major opinions in the case in 1997 and 2004.

    In the current dispute, justices will decide whether a trial judge can order the state to spend an additional $785 million on education-related items. Those items are linked to a court-sanctioned plan, dubbed the comprehensive remedial plan. That plan stems from a multiyear, multibillion-dollar proposal developed for the trial court by San Francisco-based consultant WestEd.

    In addition to the spending, justices will decide whether a trial judge can bypass the General Assembly and order other state government officials to move the $785 million out of the state treasury. Legislative leaders and the state controller's office object to the forced money transfer.

    Oral arguments are scheduled Aug. 31. Berger, Earls, and the rest of the justices will render a decision at a later date "to be chosen in the Court's discretion," according to a scheduling order.
Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

How N.C. will be affected by ‘Inflation Reduction Act’ signed into law this week Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics N.C. Supreme Court overrules 90-year-old precedent protecting nurses from legal liability


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

An assistant U.S. attorney found to have sexually assaulted his or her date will not be held accountable by prosecutors.
As part of ongoing celebrations for Latinx Heritage Month, millions of revelers gathered to remember that day just a few years ago when someone made up the word "Latinx" out of thin air.
Small businesses are concerned about profit margins amid inflationary pressures, as well as issues such as crime rates and stricter tax enforcement, according to a poll released by Job Creators Network.
Is this the next pandemic? Health experts claim that a sudden, unexpected illness is expected to cause many American employees to stay home, some for a week or more, on May 12, 2023.
MSNBC anchor Chuck Todd appeared to have a difficult time accepting Vice President Kamala Harris’ assertion that the U.S.-Mexico border was secure.
North Carolina’s unemployment rate increased to 3.5% in August after remaining flat at 3.4% for four consecutive months prior, according to the latest release from the North Carolina Department of Commerce.
Pope Francis asked for prayers on Sunday ahead of a trip this week to the former Soviet republic of Kazakhstan for an international meeting with religious leaders.


After being removed from a scenic island off the coast of Massachusetts and placed on a bus headed for a nearby military base, immigrant José Valdez has reportedly begun suspecting that the Martha's Vineyard resident who promised to be his pen pal was not actually being serious.
Retired Gen. Frank McKenzie warned on Sunday that the U.S. has limited intelligence capacity in Afghanistan 21 years after the terrorist attacks of 9/11.
N.C. lawmakers accuse redistricting plaintiffs of trying to "disestablish" the General Assembly's authority to draw state election maps.
On the 21st anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America, Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) invoked the January 6th Capitol riot.
Everyone is either a member of a family, or has close association with a family that is forced to shelter a pathetic character, ignobly tolerated; a family member that exists only to be a monumental embarrassment on their best days; their worst days are horror stories.
Superstar Chris Pratt sent a message Sunday to all those people who died in the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 — who “risked their lives for us and our country.”
Prison reform advocates are celebrating the NYPD's unprecedented move to put dangerous criminals back out on the street as quickly as possible with the unveiling of the new giant slide.
A new poll indicates that Georgia GOP candidate Herschel Walker is gaining speed in the Peach Tree State’s senate race against incumbent Senator Raphael Warnock (D-GA).


Back to Top