SCOTUS Refuses Lawsuit To Block Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Plan | Eastern North Carolina Now

The Supreme Court has rejected an emergency lawsuit to block the Biden administration’s student loan forgiveness plan.

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is John Rigolizzo.

    The Supreme Court has rejected an emergency lawsuit to block the Biden administration's student loan forgiveness plan.

    Justice Amy Coney Barrett rejected an emergency appeal from the Brown County, Wisconsin, Taxpayers Association, which sued to stop the plan from being enacted, arguing that the administration overstepped its authority in enacting the plan. Barrett, who oversees emergency appeals from Wisconsin, dismissed the appeal without comment, which is the standard procedure for emergency appeals.

    While Barrett did not issue a statement, The New York Times reported that "Justice Barrett most likely rejected the application because the plaintiff, the Brown County Taxpayers Association, did not appear to have shown that it had suffered a direct injury that gave it standing to sue." The fact that Barrett acted on her own, without referring the case to the full court or asking the administration to respond to the petition, indicated that it was not on solid ground legally, the NYT reported.

    The BCTA argued in its filing that Biden overstepped his authority under the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students ('HEROES') Act of 2003, which allows the Secretary of Education to modify federal aid programs for students during a war or a period of national emergency. The association also claimed that the sheer amount of money being handed out warranted an injunction. "We are witnessing a gargantuan increase in the national debt accomplished by a complete disregard for limitations on the constitutional spending authority," they wrote.

    The lawsuit was dismissed by a federal judge earlier this month. Judge William C. Griesbach of the Eastern District of Wisconsin ruled that the BCTA lacked standing to sue. "The Supreme Court has repeatedly held, however, that the payment of taxes is generally not enough to establish standing to challenge an action taken by the Federal Government," Griesbach wrote in his opinion, via the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. He wrote further that an injunction against the plan may not even be necessary. "A future administration may not be bound" by the plan, he wrote via NYT, "and may seek to collect the purportedly forgiven debts."

    Before the group appealed to SCOTUS, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals refused to hear an appeal in an unsigned order with no opinion, the NYT reported.

    The Wisconsin lawsuit failed, but it is far from the only suit that was filed to stop the Biden administration's student loan forgiveness plan. The Pacific Legal Foundation filed a lawsuit against the plan on September 27; then on September 29, six state attorneys general filed a complaint. Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich filed his own lawsuit the same day. Then on October 10, the Job Creators Network Foundation's Legal Action Fund filed another lawsuit seeking to stop the plan.

    In the meantime, student loan borrowers are already rushing to take advantage of the debt forgiveness plan, which forgives up to $10,000 for borrowers who make less than $125,000 a year, and up to $20,000 for students who applied for Pell grants. A beta site for the application launched last week, and more than eight million borrowers successfully applied to have their loans forgiven between Friday and Monday.

poll#160
Are you in favor of the Joe Biden Executive Order, just weeks before the midterm elections, to shift the Higher Education debt, of up to $10,000.00 per individual, to the taxpayers of this Republic (estimated at 1/2 trillion)?
  Yes, it costs so much to go to college, and the right job is so hard to find in my focus of study.
  No, one's individual debt should be born by the beneficiary of that debt; certainly NOT by others that work to support their own families and pay their own debts, and their taxes.
  I am bereft of knowledge, so who cares?
456 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

would allow civil lawsuit against judge if released criminal causes harm
"This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter narco-terror operations."
Charlie Kirk, 31 years of age, who was renowned as one of the most important and influential college speakers /Leaders in many decades; founder of Turning Point USA, has been shot dead at Utah Valley University.
The Trump administration took actions against Harvard related to the anti-Israel protests that roiled its campus.
In remembrance of the day that will forever seer the concept of 'evil' in our minds, let's look back at that fateful morning, exactly 11 years ago today to that series of horrific events which unfolded before our unbelieving eyes......

HbAD1

faced 25 years in prison for "misgendering" a leftie tranny politician
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD2

 
Back to Top