North Carolina Removes Hundreds of Thousands of Registrations from Voter Rolls | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Dr. Andy Jackson.

  • County boards of elections in North Carolina regularly remove voter registrations of people whom they confirm have died or moved out of the county
  • In addition, county boards conduct "no contact" list maintenance every two years to remove registrations of those who have not voted for a long time
  • It is erroneous to call that biennial list maintenance a "voter purge"

    Every two years, in the months following a federal election, county boards of elections remove hundreds of thousands of registrations from voter rolls. One such "purge" is taking place now.

    Election boards also regularly remove registrations due to reports that voters have died or moved out of the county.

    The North Carolina State Board of Elections (SBE) says such voter roll list maintenance is essential "because it ensures ineligible voters are not included on poll books, reduces the possibility for poll worker error and decreases opportunities for fraud."

    "Regular" List Maintenance

    County elections boards use two kinds of list maintenance to make our voter rolls cleaner. The first is what we can call "regular" list maintenance. That is when county boards have proof that someone is no longer legally eligible to vote in the county. That can include evidence that the voter no longer lives in the county, has lost the right to vote due to a felony conviction, or has died.

    For example, county elections boards use death lists from the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and the Social Security Administration to remove the registrations of the people on those lists. They also use data from the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and from federal law enforcement officials to remove those who have felony convictions.

    County boards can also remove registrations if they confirm that the voter had registered or voted in another state. That was the case with Mark Meadows. The Macon County Board of Elections removed him from the voter rolls last year after they discovered he had registered to vote in Virginia:

    Macon County Board of Elections Director Melanie Thibault confirmed April 12 that she had removed Meadows the prior day from the county's active voter list. ...

    "What I found was that he was also registered in the state of Virginia. And he voted in a 2021 election. The last election he voted in Macon County was in 2020," she said.


    People removed through regular list maintenance are immediately removed from the voter rolls.

    In addition, a county board can put a voter on the inactive list if it receives information that the voter has moved to a new address outside the county and the voter does not respond to a postcard mail from the county board.

    Biennial List Maintenance

    A problem with regular list maintenance is that it only catches a portion of registrations associated with people who are no longer legally allowed to vote in the county.

    So county elections boards also use a "no contact" process near the beginning of every odd (non-federal election) year.

    Suppose a voter has not had any contact with the elections system (such as voting or registering to vote) over the past two federal election cycles (four years). In that case, the county board sends the voter a "forwardable address confirmation mailing." If the person does not respond or the mailing is returned "undeliverable," the board places that registration on an inactive list.

    Once a registration is placed on the inactive list, officials must wait for another two federal election cycles before removing those registrations. If the person associated with that registration has any contact with election officials (such as voting or submitting a change of address within the county) during those four years, the county board of elections puts that registration back on the active voter list.

    It's not a "purge"

    Biennial list maintenance is sometimes erroneously called "voter purges." The term is inaccurate for a couple of reasons.

    First, the word "voter" is misleading in this context. Registrations are put on the inactive list after four years and removed after another four years because the people associated with those registrations were not voters during that period.

    For the same reason, biennial list maintenance has little to no impact on election outcomes. Those registrations are not producing votes and have not been producing them for a while, if ever.

    Second, the word "purge" is misleading in this context. A purge implies that elections boards seek to remove voters from the roll. As seen above, those boards are actually working to avoid removing registrations and only do so after clearing several hurdles.

    That erring on the side of keeping registrations on voter rolls is one of the reasons North Carolina keeps hundreds of thousands of names of people who are not legally eligible to vote on voter rolls. One national group, Judicial Watch, sued the SBE and two county elections boards over the large number of registrations on voter rolls. The SBE settled that lawsuit in early 2022.

    It is also why the John Locke Foundation has sought ways for North Carolina to further clean its voting rolls through data-sharing with other states. Joining would help improve regular list maintenance by removing more registrations associated with people who have moved out of the county.

    You can follow the latest changes in North Carolina voter registrations and see how registrations have changed over the past 14 years at the John Locke Foundation's Voter Registration Changes page.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Share of Union Workers at All-Time Low John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics, Bloodless Warfare: Politics For Recent Petitions Asking the N.C. Supreme Court to Rehear Redisctricting Cases, Timing Is Everything


HbAD0

Latest Bloodless Warfare: Politics

Only two of the so-called “three Johns” will be competing to replace Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) as leader of the Senate GOP.
Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro, along with hosts Matt Walsh, Andrew Klavan, and company co-founder Jeremy Boreing discussed the state of the 2024 presidential election before President Joe Biden gave his State of the Union address on Thursday.
Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley said this week that the criminal trials against former President Donald Trump should happen before the upcoming elections.
It’s “Bo time” again, this time in North Carolina’s Sixth Congressional District.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced on Tuesday that he has selected Nicole Shanahan to be his vice presidential running mate as he continues to run as an Independent after dropping out of the Democratic Party’s presidential primary late last year.
On Tuesday, another Republican announced that he plans to retire early from the House, a decision that would further diminish a narrow GOP majority in the lower chamber.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) introduced a bill Wednesday that would shave 8 hours off the standard 40-hour work week that has been around for several decades.
Glenn Beck: 'When the United States government can come after individuals, that's when you know our republic is crumbling.'
Washington, D.C. — Congressman Greg Murphy, M.D. issued the following statement on the latest continuing resolution:

HbAD1

 
Back to Top