Supreme Court Declines Challenge To Disqualify Trump From Running For President | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Brandon Drey.

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge from an obscure Republican presidential candidate on Monday who attempted to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the 2024 election.

    Efforts to remove Trump from the upcoming presidential election have ramped up nationwide after critics argued the leading Republican contender is constitutionally disqualified from serving as commander-in-chief after he allegedly "engaged in an insurrection" against the United States on January 6, 2021.

    One such attempt came from John Anthony Castro, a tax consultant from Texas seeking the Republican presidential nomination, who filed lawsuits against Trump in multiple states to eliminate him from the race, leaning on a post-Civil War provision of the 14th Amendment. The provision says any U.S. official who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution is barred from holding office ever again if they "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" or have "given aid or comfort" to insurrectionists.

    "The framers of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment specifically designed it to remove overwhelming popular pro-insurrectionists from the ballot," Castro told the justices in court filings. "As such, Castro is not simply within the 'zone' of interests; Castro is the precise type of person that the framers of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment specifically sought to politically protect while Trump is the precise type of person they sought to disqualify."


    But the nation's highest court rejected Castro's appeal of a lower court's finding that he lacked the constitutional standing to sue Trump over his alleged role in the U.S. Capitol breach.

    The justices denied the case without any comment or recorded vote on Oct. 2, which marks the first day of a new nine-month term.

    President Trump has not publicly commented on Castro's lawsuit.

    Castro's petition comes amid several other efforts from left-wing activist groups attempting to use the 14th Amendment to block Trump from appearing on state ballots. But despite the opposition from lawmakers, activists, and Trump detractors, others warn against using the clause against the former president.

    Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz said the notion puts the Constitution in "grave danger."

    "It would put the decision about who the President is in the hands of local Secretaries of State and Democratic governors, instead of in the hands of the people," Dershowitz told Just the News in August.

    Dershowitz also pointed out in an opinion article last summer that Trump cannot be disqualified under the 14th Amendment's provision because "the amendment provides no mechanism for determining whether a candidate falls within this disqualification, though it says that 'Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each house, remove such disability.'"

    "A fair reading of the text and history of the 14th Amendment makes it relatively clear, however, that the disability provision was intended to apply to those who served the Confederacy during the Civil War," he wrote. "It wasn't intended as a general provision empowering one party to disqualify the leading candidate of the other party in any future elections."

    After the former president announced his 2024 presidential election bid, Trump's campaign team anticipated a wave of legal challenges would storm Trump's effort to reclaim the White House. Trump has called the constitutional argument "election interference" and "just another 'trick' being used by the Radical Left Communists, Marxists, and Fascists, to again steal an Election."


    Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for Trump, has repeatedly criticized the legal challenges, saying, "There is no legal basis for this effort except in the minds of those who are pushing it."

    "The people who are pursuing this absurd conspiracy theory and political attack on President Trump are stretching the law beyond recognition, much like the political prosecutors in New York, Georgia and D.C.," Cheung said.

Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?
  Not sure
295 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Understanding that this fragile Republic of the self-governed is in a precarious space in our nation's vast history: What is your honor bound patriotic duty in helping to sustain the continuance of these United States of America?
  I will depend on my Democratic Socialist politicians to continue to march hard toward the Left to provide Diversity, Equity and Inclusion for all who think and do as they are told.
  I will defend the Constitution of the United States of America, and support all elected leaders who pledge to protect and insure the continued sovereignty of this Representative Republic.
  I am very concerned about maintaining my current life style without working. I was told that as long as I vote Democrat, I had nothing to worry about ... but now I worry.
288 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

In stripping away the heavy varnish of fakery by the heavy handed Corrupt Corporate Media; in taking a true view of what is real, right now with clear open eyes: How do you see this 46th President of these States United; what is your visceral first impression of Joe Biden after nearly 3 years on the job?
  A good man, wise and kind
  The Socialist President
  A president in praise of his son
  The Non Patriot President
  A successful president
  The Idiot President
  A knowledgeable president
  A corrupt president
  A perfect leader of the Democratic Socialist party
  The man is married to a "Doctor"
441 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

In light of continued developments, primarily since 2008, there exists in these United States a Legal System which operates on a proved Two Tiered approach to justice rendered, which primarily benefits Democratic Elites and Woke Ideological Virtue Signalers, representing their co-dependent wards, to the expressed exclusion of normal hardworking American citizens: What is your suggestion in remedying this widespread injustice and, if not corrected, its existential outcome for our Constitutional Republic?
  Complete overhaul of the Department of Justice and their enforcers - the FBI - to reflect a far more honest justice system to keep patriots remaining calm.
  Disband the FBI, and request that congress investigate all unethical and non patriotic practices to partially right the wrongs of a distrusted and politically weaponized "Department of Justice."
  Continue with the current system since the two tiered justice system has been so remarkably beneficial to Democratic Socialist political hegemony; chronic distrust in institutions notwithstanding.
624 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

Back to Top