NY Post Says Harvard ‘Threatened’ Them For Looking Into Plagiarism Claims | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Mairead Elordi.

    The New York Post said Tuesday that a lawyer for Harvard University "threatened" them for looking into plagiarism allegations against the school's president.

    The Post said it contacted the university on October 24 asking for comment on 27 alleged instances in which Harvard President Claudine Gay's work appears very similar to other academics' words and phrasing.

    Harvard's senior executive director of media relations and communications, Jonathan Swain, who is also a former Hillary Clinton aide and served as a member of the Biden administration's transition team, responded by asking for more time to review Gay's work, the Post said.

    The next day, Swain said he would "get back in touch over the next couple of days" but then did not respond after that.

HbAD0

    Then on October 27, a major Virginia attorney, Thomas Clare of the law firm Clare-Locke, contacted the Post saying he was Harvard's and Gay's defamation counsel.

    Harvard finally publicly admitted on Tuesday that the school had investigated Gay's academic work for plagiarism, a day after the Manhattan Institute's Christopher Rufo posted questions about Gay's PhD dissertation on social media.

    In a letter to "members of the Harvard community," the college said the probe began in late October after the school "became aware" of allegations about Gay's work.

    The investigation found "a few instances of inadequate citation" but concluded she had not violated Harvard's "standards for research misconduct." Harvard said Gay would request four corrections in two of her published works to insert citations and quotation marks that had been "omitted."

    "In this tumultuous and difficult time, we unanimously stand in support of President Gay," Harvard's letter added.

    The controversy around Gay's academic writings comes on the heels of her highly criticized congressional testimony on Harvard's response to anti-Semitism on campus.

    Gay along with the presidents of MIT and the University of Pennsylvania avoided answering whether calling for the genocide of Jews violated the universities' codes of conduct.

    "It can be, depending on the context," Gay told the lawmakers. She said such hate speech is "at odds with the values of Harvard" and that when that kind of "speech crosses into conduct, that violates our policies."

    Some of the academics whose work appeared very similar to Gay's said they did not feel she had plagiarized them.

    However, Anne Williamson, a professor of political science at the University of Miami in Ohio, was less happy, even "angry," she told the Post.

    Gay's 2017 paper "A Room for One's Own? The Partisan Allocation of Affordable Housing" has phrases that are very similar to a 2011 paper by Williamson.

HbAD1

    "It does look like plagiarism to me," Williamson told the Post. "If they are going to do what they did, then I should be cited as a reference. My first reaction is shock. The second reaction is puzzlement. There was a way to draw from my paper. All she had to do is give me a credit."

    Gay, 53, became Harvard's first black president earlier this year.

poll#212
A majority of Americans still believe in OUR 1st Amendment guaranteed Freedom of Speech; however, at what bold point does the constitutional right to Free Speech becomes unabashed anti-Semitic Hate Speech, and while it should possibly be tolerated on our college campuses, and on the streets of mostly Sanctuary Cities, these events should be rightfully observed and scrupulously monitored ... or, not? What is your true opinion of when too much of enough is just too much, or not?
  The answer to Free Speech I don't agree with is more, and incredibly robust Free Speech.
  There is a point when Free Speech becomes counter productive to sustaining a peaceful society.
  Free Speech should only be tolerated if it represents the status quo of the highly educated orthodoxy.
  Early in life, I learned to speak only when I am spoken to.
169 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#164
It has been far too many years since the Woke theology interlaced its canons within the fabric of the Indoctrination Realm, so it is nigh time to ask: Does this Representative Republic continue, as a functioning society of a self-governed people, by contending with the unusual, self absorbed dictates of the Woke, and their vast array of Victimhood scenarios?
  Yes, the Religion of Woke must continue; there are so many groups of underprivileged, underserved, a direct result of unrelenting Inequity; they deserve everything.
  No; the Woke fools must be toppled from their self-anointed pedestal; a functioning society of a good Constitutional people cannot withstand this level of "existential" favoritism as it exists now.
  I just observe; with this thoughtful observation: What will happen "when the Vikings are breeching our walls;" how do the Woke react?
845 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Missouri Senator Josh Hawley Endorses Trump Institutionalized Corruption, Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Government, Op-Ed & Politics ‘Progressive Tyrants’: Missouri AG Launches Investigation Into Media Matters

HbAD2

 
Back to Top