Joe Biden is witness tampering in Hunter Biden trial

Latest Polls (view all)

Where do you stand on the Transgender Issue now that the issue has gotten to the overt point of the open celebration of this lifestyle choice, dictated by certain direct and explicit actions.

90.68% I do not approve of behavior that has within its expressed tenants policies that harm children.

8.47% I do support the Trans Community in all its many facets because diversity is at a premium in today's society.

0.85% What is a "Children's Drag Queen Story Hour?"

Click Here to Vote
118 Vote(s)

View all Polls

Joe Biden is witness tampering in Hunter Biden trial

Published: Monday, May 27th, 2024 @ 4:07 pm
By: John Steed ( More Entries )

Is it proper for the very powerful father of a criminal defendant to go to the home of one of the announced prosecution witnesses in the case and have a one on one meeting with her shortly before the trial is scheduled.? Talking in the abstract, almost everyone would see that as witness tampering.. Well, Joe Biden just did that with one of the listed prosecution witnesses in the trial of his crooked son Hunter Biden.

Now the liberal MSM is screaming about the incident, but not about the fact that Joe did it. They seem okay with that. What they are screaming about is that it has been reported in the conservative media.

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2024/05/27/joe-biden-met-with-one-of-the-witnesses-against-hunter-biden-liberals-go-ballistic-over-reporting-n2174712

This is just another sign of the two tiered justice system, based on politics that we are now living in here in America. In contrast the corrupt Manhattan kangaroo court judge Juan Merchan, a Biden political contributor, allowed the prosecution witnesses against Trump to spew whatever venom they wanted in the media against Trump, but gagged Trump on responding to it.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/3017475/son-of-a-gun-the-hunter-biden-cases-that-never-were/

Go Back

Login to Leave a Comment

Comments

Big Bob said:

( May 29th, 2024 @ 2:55 pm )

I'm just sayin..if the SC sides with Dump, it better be after JB is out of office. Otherwise the dumpster is headed for Gitmo. Who could stop him?

Rino Hunter said:

( May 29th, 2024 @ 10:05 am )

The tunnel vision of your Trump Derangement Syndrome, Bobbie, shows you haven't followed anything at that trial. Even the experts on far left CNN are saying it is a travestry. Paying "hush money" has never been a crime. This is a manufactured political show trial just like Stalin used to do.

Crooked politicized kangaroo courts - where democracy goes to die.

Big Bob said:

( May 29th, 2024 @ 9:29 am )

Trump wasn't president when he paid hush money to Stormy. Giving him a pass is un American. Nobody is above the law.

Steven P. Rader said:

( May 29th, 2024 @ 8:50 am )

There are two parts to presidential immunity. The first is that a president cannot be prosecuted while in office. That is very well established and, for now, protects Biden from his corruption history even though much of that happened before he was president. Biden, however, may be open for prosecution of matters prior to his presidency after he leaves office.

The second, which is less well established and is now before the Supreme Court is permanent presidential immunity for actions taken while president. Most legal scholars beleive that such immunity exists at least to some degree but the issue is whether it covers all actions or just particular types of actions, and that is what the SCOTUS must now decide.

Big Bob said:

( May 28th, 2024 @ 8:45 pm )

Yet you want the SCOtUS to side with dump and make presidents immune. Which is it? Dump wins that case, JB is un touchable. Why would u support that?

Steven P. Rader said:

( May 28th, 2024 @ 5:01 pm )

A president is immune from prosecution while holding office, but given some of the corruption evidence that has come out, Biden might not be laughing after he loses in November. On the witness tampering, Biden's own DOJ would have to go after him on that, and politically that is not going to happen regardless of whether it should under the law.

Whether you ask top legal experts like renowned law proferors Alan Dershowitz or Jonathan Turley or the American public in polls, everyone except the diehard leftists knows this is a political prosecution, and the level of wealth is totally irrelevant in a political prosecution.

The extent that Judge Merchan will abuse his office to temporarily get a conviction, even if certain to be overturned on appeal is astounding. The SCOTUS has long ruled that a jury must be unanimous on all elements of a crime to get a conviction. That is black letter law. Judge Merchan's intended jury instruction, however, would allow conviction without being unanimous on the issue of the neccessary "other crime" which is something the prosecution has not offered a shred of evidence on. An unbiased judge would have dismissed the case at the close of the state's evidence on that alone.

Most judges care a lot about not getting overturned on appeal and srive for lawful rulings on issues for that reason. Merchan seems not to care and repeatedly makes off the wall rulings that invite appeal. Dershowitz thinks this particular one is so bad and so blatant, it may get any conviction overturned very quickly.