Trump Admin Accuses Boston Of Illegal Race-Based Housing Policies | Eastern NC Now

Federal investigators say Mayor Michelle Wu’s administration embedded racial preferences into major housing programs.

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Hank Berrien.

    The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has launched a sweeping civil rights investigation into the city of Boston, accusing Democratic Mayor Michelle Wu's administration of implementing housing policies that unlawfully favor black, Latino, and other minority residents. The probe, announced Thursday, represents one of the most aggressive federal interventions yet in the Trump administration's broader effort to dismantle local diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives it argues violate anti-discrimination law.

    In a sharply worded letter to Wu, HUD's Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity said, "The context of race, fair housing is not about 'the absence of racial discrimination . . . but the presence of deliberate systems . . . to achieve and sustain racial equity.' But this is wrong. The text of the Fair Housing Act is unmistakably focused on eliminating discrimination in the housing market and outlining the penalties for engaging in this kind of discrimination."

    Assistant Secretary Craig Trainor wrote to Wu, "At your office's direction, however, City officials have set out to smuggle 'racial equity into every layer of operations in City government.'" The letter added, "City Officials Have Enthusiastically Embraced and Appear to Have Implemented the City's Proposed Racial Spoils System."

    HUD Secretary Scott Turner echoed that language, calling Boston's approach a "social engineering project" driven by DEI ideology rather than legitimate housing needs. "This warped mentality will be fully exposed," Turner said, vowing the city would be brought into compliance with federal law. Turner has previously criticized what he calls race-based policymaking and, earlier this week, blamed former President Joe Biden for housing pressures tied to immigration, citing HUD's newly released "Worst Case Housing Needs" report.

    At issue are several city housing plans-most notably the Boston Housing Strategy 2025, the Assessment of Fair Housing, and the Anti-Displacement Action Plan-which call for targeted outreach to black and Latino families, increased lending in communities of color, and allocations of homeownership opportunities intended "particularly" for BIPOC households. One goal states that 65 percent of city-supported homeownership opportunities should go to BIPOC residents. HUD argues that these provisions constitute explicit racial preferences prohibited under federal civil rights law and past Supreme Court precedent that rejects "outright racial balancing."

HbAD0

    HUD's letter also criticizes Boston's use of racially based data tools, including maps that classify neighborhoods partly by racial composition to identify areas at "high risk" of displacement and thus eligible for more city investment. The department said these classifications revive the logic of "government-sponsored redlining," even if intended to combat inequity. It further alleges that city agencies and nonprofit partners have implemented "race-conscious marketing and buyer selection," and that Boston has pressured banks and developers to adopt race-based benchmarks.

    The investigation reflects the Trump administration's broader shift in civil rights enforcement, which has increasingly targeted DEI programs while cutting back on traditional fair housing oversight.

    HUD will request documents from the city within 10 days, after which investigators may file formal discrimination charges or refer the case to the Justice Department.

poll#201
Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure
508 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#218
Now that President Trump is picking his cabinet and immediate staff to insulate him from the poor judgement of the Bureaucratic Class, while moving quickly to transition this Constitutional Republic unto a wise and sustainable direction: What is your immediate impression as to how our nation will prosper?
  We are headed toward a Golden Age in America's self-governed society.
  This will all wind up in a clustered mess since Trump is a Fascist, and thought to be the second coming of Adolf Hitler by our best journalists.
  This is a time where critical days lay ahead, where only wise and responsible decisions must be made to sustain US.
  I generally do not pay attention, but expect only the best to occur ... and that is what I always expect.
161 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

HbAD1

Latest State and Federal

Tax Day is a week away, and the reports are in: North Carolinians are winning big with record-setting tax returns thanks to President Trump and Republicans' Working Families Tax Cuts.
“It is a trust fund, a piece of the American economy for every child that they will be able to take out when they are 18.”
For most of her life, Zofia Cheeseman built her life and schedule around being a gymnast until a health scare forced her to look at her life off the mat.
"We could very well end up having a friendly takeover of Cuba."
You can't make this up. If you turned this script into Hollywood, they'd say it's too on the nose.
"Alaska native" firms, most often in Virginia, were paid $45 billion in Pentagon contracts thanks to DEI law.

HbAD2

 
 
Back to Top