Comments by Bobby Tony | Eastern North Carolina Now

Browse all Comments by Bobby Tony...

ENCNow

Comments by Bobby Tony

Commented on

He may well have fit into the old Reader's Digest MY MOST UNFORGETTABLE CHARACTER. Apparently he also had a good sense of humor about his accidental fame.

"The author and forager Euell Theophilus Gibbons once served as the folksy face of Grape-Nuts, the breakfast cereal that contains neither grapes nor nuts. The television campaign featured Gibbons delivering his now-famous “Ever eat a pine tree?” line, which catapulted him from darling of the back-to-nature movement to an unwitting victim of America’s pop culture. The script was penned, of course, by Madison Avenue pitchmen, lampooned by late-night comedians, and even parodied in later television shows and Grape-Nuts ads by Gibbons himself. (“You know, the other day I ate some goose poop I found on my lawn.”)"

www.adventure-journal.com
Commented: Sunday, September 23rd, 2018 @ 6:46 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

Diane, Thanks for the clarification. I deleted a few paragraphs from the article because I was not sure if it was an accurate summary. As a layman, I most likely still have some misconceptions in the previously deleted sections shown below.

If you have ever used the phrase "IT IS THE LAW OF THE LAND" to describe a Supreme Court decision, perhaps you should review the foundation on which the court was established. If nine judges can make law, then nine judges can overturn the law. Today, that is what has the Liberal side of the Political spectrum so concerned. They have been able to create rights that have not been through the process proscribed in passing laws; i.e. Voted on and signed by Executive or through the amendment process which is intentionally cumbersome. They have also been able to find rights where none were enumerated in the constitution. They would also be willing to deny rights that are clearly listed in the constitution by majority of five (5) judges.
Placing our dependence on nine (9) judges to make law is more than a slippery slope, it is a cliff. There was a time in our recent (81 years) history when even the Democratic party and it most exalted president understood and tried to subvert the Supreme Court in order to validate his policies. FDR made an aborted attempt to "Pack the Court" because many of his New Deal plans had been struck down by the court.

See quote below:
"In April, however, before the bill came to a vote in Congress, two Supreme Court justices came over to the liberal side and by a narrow majority upheld as constitutional the National Labor Relations Act and the Social Security Act. The majority opinion acknowledged that the national economy had grown to such a degree that federal regulation and control was now warranted. Roosevelt’s reorganization plan was thus unnecessary, and in July the Senate struck it down by a vote of 70 to 22. Soon after, Roosevelt had the opportunity to nominate his first Supreme Court justice, and by 1942 all but two of the justices were his appointees."

www.history.com
Commented: Friday, September 21st, 2018 @ 5:14 pm By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

BUT YOU CAN TRY!!

Commented: Friday, September 21st, 2018 @ 7:32 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

BUT YOU CAN TRY!!

Commented: Friday, September 21st, 2018 @ 7:19 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

If I could not laugh, I might cry.

Finding humor in the middle of chaos is a defense mechanism learned long ago and far away.

"It don't mean nothing!"

www.urbandictionary.com
Commented: Thursday, September 20th, 2018 @ 12:02 pm By: Bobby Tony
Comment and expanded verbiage at this link.

beaufortcountynow.com
Commented: Thursday, September 20th, 2018 @ 11:51 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

She too may have lost her chance. I notice her right hand is on his Bu!! Of course it would be inappropriate to comment on her attire which seems to advertise a certain gender preference on his part.

I have often wondered why they give only one of them a name tag.
Commented: Thursday, September 20th, 2018 @ 8:51 am By: Bobby Tony
This morning's blasphemy thought for the day.

We should do away with public hearings regarding confirmation hearings for cabinet officials as well as court justices. They are nothing more than campaign devices for the Senators to drum up support for their next election. Hearings should be done in private and voted on in public. Then any transcripts or documents related to the process released to the public.

Using the hearing to drum up public support for a candidate or party is not the purpose of the advice and consent principle. Our government has turned into the ultimate "Comic opera which denotes a sung dramatic work of a light or comic nature, usually with a happy ending," for everyone except the voters and the public. (wikipedia-Comic_Opera)

"There’s nothing in the Constitution that says nominees must testify at their hearings, or that hearings have to take place at all. The Senate could just vote. But, these days, they don’t — and there are several important reasons why.
The only thing the Constitution is clear about is that the public shouldn’t have the final vote on these nominees. For the “people at large” to hold the “power of appointment” would be “impracticable,” Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist Paper #76. So, Article II Section II of Constitution says the President “shall nominate” the justices, “by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.” At the time, state legislatures chose U.S. Senators, so the selection process was even further removed from the passions of the people. But for a long time, that “advice and consent” took place largely without any grilling of nominees."

time.com
Commented: Thursday, September 20th, 2018 @ 7:32 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

Naturally, I have a story about voter guides. My wife still tells the story about my Dad sitting down and filling out the sample ballot for the family and handing it out. Since we were early in our marriage (1975) she chose not to engage in a political discussion. That may have been the last year she followed that advice. Later she asked me what to do and I told her take the ballot and vote the way you want to. It was not worth the discussion or potential argument which would not change anyone's mind.

While I have a pretty good idea how my wife has voted in our forty-three years of marriage, I cannot say with certainty because I have always believed that voting was a deeply personal decision and I also had faith that she was smart enough to make up her own mind. I am also wise enough to know when to follow my own advice to her from the first paragraph above.

For the record, I think there have been many elections where both of us could have stayed away from the voting booth and it would not have made any difference in the outcome of the total vote count.
Commented: Thursday, September 20th, 2018 @ 6:53 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

It is not the LIV voters that we should be concerned about but the WIV (Wrong Information Voters) that are the .. Wait a minute, on second thought they are probably both the same group. If I were going to undergo heart surgery, I don't think I would want my surgeon to be average. That means that when he is on the top of his game he is barely above the lowest 1/2. Same is true for voting public.

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." Winston Churchill

“Our Founders designed a system that makes it more difficult to bring about change than I would like sometimes.” The Big O
Commented: Wednesday, September 19th, 2018 @ 6:01 pm By: Bobby Tony
Everyone you meet is either a blessing or a lesson.

I too have been the latter many times, hopefully I can add a few of the former to my list.
Commented: Tuesday, September 18th, 2018 @ 11:04 am By: Bobby Tony
I was raised in a family that consisted of three men and one woman. One dad, myself and one brother and a mother. It was also during a time of obvious somewhat benign misogynistic behavior toward women. However it was my mother who quietly set the standard with the reinforcement of the good old Baptist preacher who held forth three blocks from our house. She was the underpinning upon which proper behavior was established. By most objective standards of the day, she was the Gone with the Wind 'Melanie' as opposed to the rambunctious 'Scarlett,' but there was never any doubt about her inner strength.

My own family consist of a son, a daughter, husband and wife. It may have been somewhat poetic justice that I had both a son and a daughter, but I tried to reestablish the appropriate standards of behavior toward women in my son. I also made a special effort to imbue my daughter with the liberation from the victim-hood that has a tendency to weaken the fairer sex when they adapt that status. It may also be poetic justice that I married a 'Scarlett-on steroids" who did not suffer fools gladly.

The contrast between my mother and my wife is more of a difference in style than it was a trait of potency. I fear our society is in danger of losing the balance provided by the depth of character that once exhibited itself in the women in our lives.

For the hand that rocks the cradle Is the hand that rules the world.
www.theotherpages.org
Commented: Tuesday, September 18th, 2018 @ 10:14 am By: Bobby Tony
This is going to sound extremely crass and patriarchal, but regardless of the facts of this particular case, the limits of social behavior have always been enforced by the female in social interactions. As one who has occasionally (?) veered over the line in social interaction, I can attest that a firm slap or stern verbal assault often set me back on the straight and narrow. The fact is that only two people will ever know the truth about this incident. I am also aware that now both the people involved in this drama will forever be damaged by the current climate much more than they were to the original incident if it occurred as described.

There is no excuse for inappropriate behavior, but history has taught us that failure to respond at the time of the violation only encourages continued behavior from the perpetrator. Two of the best examples of this are the Holocaust and Slavery. This is by no means an excuse for the behavior but it took a violent course to correct those societal excesses. Even years later, we are still suffering from the seeds planted by assuming the status of victimhood. Identifying as a victim often provides the excuse that one cannot prevent events that happen to them. There is a distinct difference between identifying as a victim and actually being a victim. Please do not take this as blaming the victim, it is merely an observation that lack of reaction only serves to perpetuate the abuse.

I am aware of only one case where a willing victim actually changed the course of history, and we are still trying to learn from that lesson:
“And I , if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me. “John 12:32

While I realize that it easier to say than to practice this principle, I often wondered how long Harvey Weinstein would have been able to get away with his shenanigans if the first aspiring actress would have raised holy hell at his first step over the line. I have no way to know if the current allegations are true, but I do know that they are a tactic used for the sole purpose of achieving a goal that could not be achieved by following the "advice and consent" principle under which judges are confirmed. Unfortunately, the Statues of Limitations does not apply to character destruction in a political battle. The purpose of this allegation is not the search for truth but a question of tactics, nothing more or less.

"Statutes of limitations, which date back to early Roman Law, are a fundamental part of European and U.S. law. These statutes, which apply to both civil and criminal actions, are designed to prevent fraudulent and stale claims from arising after all evidence has been lost or after the facts have become obscure through the passage of time or the defective memory, death, or disappearance of witnesses."

legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com
Commented: Tuesday, September 18th, 2018 @ 8:34 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

A well rounded man about town knows how to survive. He can have his choice of a quick meat and One, or perhaps a seafood entre, occasionally a French gourmet meal, or just a warm up snack. In the event of emergency, there is always the fall back if he is within 15 minutes of a strip mall.

Commented: Monday, September 17th, 2018 @ 7:53 am By: Bobby Tony
I always thought that the first rule of comedy is that the comic must be funny.

Why such a simple premise has been lost on today's crop of comics is an indication that we all may take ourselves too seriously. At one time I found all these men funny to varying degrees thought I most likely disagreed with many of their political opinions: Mort Sahl, Lenny Bruce , George Carlin, Dick Gregory

Even Shakespeare had his critics then and now who did not find his play "As you Like It" particularly comedic, but at least he understood that not every performance is a masterpiece.

"All the world's a stage
And all the men and women merely players;
They have their exits and their entrances,
And one man in his time plays many parts ..."

Nobel Prize-winning playwright George Bernard Shaw, who thought As You Like It was a cheap crowd-pleaser, wrote the following: "It was in As You Like It that the sententious William first began to openly exploit the fondness of the British public for sham moralizing and stage 'philosophy'"

www.shmoop.com
Commented: Sunday, September 16th, 2018 @ 9:52 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

In the interest of Clarity, I am not in favor of eliminating all statues, monuments or other reminders of significant events in history. Quite the opposite, I think we should have reminders of our highs and lows on display for historical reference. The problem lies with the changing political landscape subject to the results of every election that makes every election a referendum on various public monuments of the past. As a society, we already spend an inordinate amount of time and resources revising history without the need for the government to do so every two or four years based on the low turnout outcome of elections.

My belief is that most of these monuments would be better served in a private setting such as a museum or park with paid admittance. The possible exception to this would be the Smithsonian Institution which is charged with maintaining historical artifacts. However a case could be made that this too would be better served if funded with private or corporate money or admission pricing.

"The Institution's thirty million annual visitors are admitted without charge. Its annual budget is around $1.2 billion with 2/3 coming from annual federal appropriations.[9] Other funding comes from the Institution's endowment, private and corporate contributions, membership dues, and earned retail, concession, and licensing revenue. Institution publications include Smithsonian and Air & Space magazines."
en.wikipedia.org

I plead guilty of trying to oversimplify a complex subject, but it seems to me that we have enough government Bureaucrats more than willing to complicate a simple issue as well.

Misquote: "A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon, you're talking real money."

Clarification: "Oh, I never said that. A newspaper fella misquoted me once, and I thought it sounded so good that I never bothered to deny it." Everett Dirksen
Commented: Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 8:42 am By: Bobby Tony
The comment was extracted from a much longer article to myself as I tried to clarify my thinking on the subject. I will work on it and see if it passes my low threshold for publication.

"I write to clarify my thinking. After all the bars are not open that late!" Unknown

Here is a link to the article based on this comment.
beaufortcountynow.com
Commented: Tuesday, September 11th, 2018 @ 9:36 am By: Bobby Tony
Good point, I think the idea I was trying to convey was the basic difference between property and happiness.
"Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"

When Jefferson changed "property" to the "pursuit of happiness" he introduced a concept instead of a concrete based right. Pursuit can be interpreted in numerous ways. While happiness may sound better than property (particularly with the issue of slavery as property) it leaves open the expansion of rights to feelings and wishes. Jefferson is my favorite anarchist of the founding fathers, but his eloquence with words (B$) belied his deeply held distrust in government in this case.

The laws should protect 'property rights' regardless of ownership. It is just that when we have "public property" we have conferred individual rights to an institution and perhaps the same could be said for corporations.
Commented: Monday, September 10th, 2018 @ 10:30 am By: Bobby Tony
Thanks for a great article and great comment section:

I have long held the belief that humans are basically incapable of separating the warrior from the war. My own experience indicates that most soldiers enlist or answer the draft not for a cause but because of some sense of patriotism or duty to the rule of law. However, once in the battle they fight for each other and not some esoteric nuance of philosophy. They fight for survival. It is most difficult for even soldiers to separate the warrior from the war because if the war was wrong they must admit that their participation in it was wrong.

World War II is one of the best examples that we have to show how a population must finally admit they were on the wrong side of history. Once they do that and admit to themselves and society, then they can put the events in proper perspective. It is also true that the artifacts of the losing side were systematically removed or placed in a proper historical context.

It is my belief that the confederate monument issue is nothing more than two political viewpoints arguing over the long held basic issues and assigning too much significance to the artifact. Dehumanization of the enemy is a propaganda technique used by both sides. If you are not with me you are against me.

I also believe that as a matter of practical techniques appropriating the symbols of the other side and re-define them in your own terms is often used by politicians and debaters. If you can successfully do that then you have neutered the opposition's symbols. If you can assign some extreme emotional content to the symbol then you can invigorate your followers.

Human nature tends to reduce everything down to a basic stereotype based on appearance. There is no better example than the recent memorial services of Aretha Franklin and John McCain. Both were hijacked by charlatans who saw a chance to "not let a 'crisis' go to waste!"

While I am in agreement with Diane, Stan and Alex on most of their points, I find it terribly disconcerting that we continue to place our faith in individuals rather than principles. Looking for a savior in the political arena is akin to looking for one in the pulpit. Both will end in despair, disappointment and perhaps damnation.
Commented: Monday, September 10th, 2018 @ 10:03 am By: Bobby Tony
As usual, I was imprecise in my comment. Fortunately The point that I was trying to make was expressed so well in this link below on this very site. To me it is not a matter of Confederate statues , it is a matter of rule of law. I have gradually evolved into the belief that statues and monuments should not displayed or maintained on public land because of the very fact that opinions can change and history can be revised or reviled from either side. I might even go so far as to say that our government already controls too much land and should not be in a position of ownership, but perhaps be tenants in privately owned and maintained properties. Perhaps the marketplace is the best place to determine the value of statues, bust and other memorials to history. If all such monuments were placed in a pay to see private locations we might get back to limited government. People could vote with their dollars. Unfortunately, that may make me a far ????-? Libertarian, who has veered into the ditch that used to be part of the individualism that this country was founded upon. That is based my belief that it is not a slippery slope but a cliff.

beaufortcountynow.com
Commented: Saturday, September 1st, 2018 @ 7:58 am By: Bobby Tony
Since it is a NC matter, I probably should not put my two cents in but my general feeling is that the best way to relieve courts and unburden prosecutors is to reduce the useless laws and prosecute laws that involve property damage, personal injury, abuse of rights etc. Allowing the judicial system to operate at the whim of appointed or election magistrates is fraught with political bias which defeats the intent of the law. I am not a fan of mandatory sentences but determination of guilt should not rest with prosecutors it should rest with the court system. Not bringing a case makes laws a mute subject and adds to the disregard for laws by a significant segment of the population.

A quick check of the purpose of law at numerous sites indicates: (Note minimally acceptable behavior)

"The law serves many purposes and functions in society. Four principal purposes and functions are establishing standards, maintaining order, resolving disputes, and protecting liberties and rights. The law is a guidepost for minimally acceptable behavior in society."
Commented: Friday, August 31st, 2018 @ 5:59 pm By: Bobby Tony
This may fall under the FBI's Comey's 'no reasonable prosecutor would bring a case' doctrine, which I am sure Joshua Stein the current Attorney General of North Carolina subscribes too. Elections do indeed have consequences.

"North Carolina - The destruction of property crime in North Carolina is written as Willfull and Wanton Injury to Property. If the prosecution has probable cause to believe you willfully and wantonly damaged, injured, or destroyed any property (whether public or private), you could be charged with Willful and Wanton Injury to Property in the North Carolina Criminal Courts.

Willful and Wanton Injury to Property is a Class 1 misdemeanor which carries a potential sentence of up to 1 year in jail."

www.criminalpropertydamage.com
Commented: Thursday, August 30th, 2018 @ 10:38 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

I have long though the JFK era was the rubicon where perception trumped principle in politics. The sixties were the final transition from radio to TV. Governing decisions with an eye to public opinion replaced leadership and carefully crafted persona were created by both the press and the political advisors, JFK being the perfect example of a manufactured image which bore little resemblance to the real man.

The Cuban missile crisis was a direct result of Nikita Khrushchev’s judgement that the elite in Washington were weak based on the Bay of Pigs fiasco. One can only wonder what course history would have taken had Fidel not been able to overthrow our corrupted puppet Batista.

Today’s apologists still try to lay the whole blame on LBJ, but we must remember he was still operating with JFK’s elitist whiz-kids of the Ivy League schools who were responsible for a good many of the “F-ups” of Vietnam. McNamara ran the war by the numbers and had no more of an idea about reality than he would trying to find the one “Chevy” in a parking lot full of Fords, and prior to his appointment as Sec of Defense he was the president of Ford

www.thecrimson.com
Commented: Saturday, August 25th, 2018 @ 11:01 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

A good case could be made that it was “deep thinkers” that got us in that awful war. As a matter of fact, someone did make that case. David HAlbersham’s The Best and Brightest.

"For anyone who aspires to a position of national leadership, no matter the circumstances of his or her birth, this book should be mandatory reading. And anyone who feels a need, as a confused former prisoner of war once felt the need, for insights into how a great and good nation can lose a war and see its worthy purposes and principles destroyed by self-delusion can do no better than to read and reread David Halberstam’s The Best and the Brightest."
--from the Foreword by Senator John McCain

www.amazon.com
Commented: Friday, August 24th, 2018 @ 3:59 pm By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

Here is a clip from the 2000 Blues Brothers sequel. Matt did not get a speaking line then either. I doubt most people even knew who he was on the second pass. Dan Aykroyd was exposed to the blues in Ottawa and became an aficionado. I may have to dig up a copy of both movies to refresh my memory. Atlanta had quite a few blues bars back in the 1970s where they would allow us honkies to enter without fear of problems as long as we had a brother to vouch for us. Somewhere along the way we seem to have lost that.

youtu.be
Commented: Monday, August 20th, 2018 @ 1:04 pm By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

Matt Guitar Murphy "Matt's Guitar Boogie" Live in 1963 accompanied by Memphis Slim ( Piano ), Billy Stepney ( Drums ) and Willie Dixon ( Double Bass )

youtu.be
Commented: Monday, August 20th, 2018 @ 9:06 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

In spite of my being a dyed in the wool skeptic, I have always believed that given the true facts of a dilemma, the public will come to a logical conclusion. There have always been those who feel the need to shade the truth, but at the risk of falling into the "it is worse now than it has ever been" trap, I can't help but note that "it is worse now than it has ever been."

Both left and right of the political spectrum seem to prefer exaggeration, embellishment or outright misdirection to make their points. My faith in the common sense of the public to a large degree will be confirmed or shaken by the upcoming election which unlike the electoral college is based on the majority in each district and state when it comes to congressmen, governors and senators. We may be at the tipping point where everyone is trying to play the system without realizing that they are the system.

Commented: Monday, August 6th, 2018 @ 10:46 am By: Bobby Tony
That I do.

For the Record, the carrier is the USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) Commissioned 25 Oct 1986
Commented: Thursday, August 2nd, 2018 @ 7:53 pm By: Bobby Tony
Agreed. Reminds me of the phrase “ Just because I am paranoid, it does not mean they are not out to get me!”

One if my psychology professors once defined arrogance as the condition where most of the ego is above sea level rather than below it. In stormy seas a top heavy ego (arrogance)can tip over while a submerged ego provides ballast. I have alternated between the two extremes a few times myself; usually in times of high stress.

Commented: Thursday, August 2nd, 2018 @ 2:28 pm By: Bobby Tony
I have given President Trump a pass on his hubris before because of his New York roots, but I stopped doing that because in order to be consistent I would have to also give a pass to: Jim Acosta, Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon, Lester Holt, Rachel Maddow, Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, George Stephanopoulos, and all the rest of those on this list:

en.wikipedia.org

That is just too much to ask from a poor Georgia Boy.
Commented: Thursday, August 2nd, 2018 @ 1:36 pm By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

Apparently there is a secret list of things that you can identify as and still be within the Liberal acceptance world. I tried identifying as a Liberal in hopes of discovering the list but it did not set well on my stomach and I had to regurgitate and abandon that experiment. The search continues.
Commented: Thursday, August 2nd, 2018 @ 8:58 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

Here is another one.

youtu.be
Commented: Wednesday, August 1st, 2018 @ 10:57 am By: Bobby Tony

Commented on

I identify as a rich person, but it doesn't seem to be working out with my bill collectors.
Commented: Tuesday, July 31st, 2018 @ 9:45 am By: Bobby Tony
When I married and had children I operated on the Postulate (see above) that teenage behavior is based largely on the Peer group of the child. No matter how well you try to train them about between right and wrong, they will gravitate towards the social norms of their peer group. For that reason I monitored their friends for clues of their character. That included selecting the neighborhood, school and social environment they operated in. It was not racist, homophobic or elitism but parenting that I was trying to apply.

Fortunately, today I don't have to face the pitfalls of a Peer teacher indoctrinating my kids, but I do have grand kids and have warned my son about my Postulate. It doesn't take a village, it takes concerned parents. Hopefully he will be aware of the influence of the boys on the block when his boys reach teen years.

The military calls it unit cohesion, gangs call it blood, cops call it perps, lawyers call it defendant and wardens call it Inmate. I am fairly close to calling my Postulate a Theorem.
Commented: Tuesday, July 31st, 2018 @ 8:53 am By: Bobby Tony
« Newer     Older »     

HbAD0

 
Back to Top