Comments | Eastern NC Now

Yes. The smart people will figure it out.

Commented: Friday, May 3rd, 2024 @ 9:58 am By: Big Bob

Illegal aliens are a drag on the economy in all western countries. In Germany, for example, 60% of the welfare payments in the entire country go to illegal alien "asylum seekers". If countries would cut off the welfare, they would eliminate a lot of the "pull" factor for illegal aliens.

Commented: Thursday, May 2nd, 2024 @ 7:35 pm By: borderhawk

Having personally visited quite a few British historical museums in London and elsewhere, including the British Museum and the Imperial War Museum in London, and the Historic Ships at Portsmouth, I noted very little difference in the presentations regarding the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812 where we were on opposite sides.

One of the very few nuisances was when visiting the National Museum of the Royal Navy at Hartlepool, England (where an original frigate from the War of 1812 period is on display), one factor that I have never seen mentioned in the US was the difference in construction and armament standards between the European frigates of the period and the class of super frigates like Constitution which were build and armed to ship-of-the-line standards although their number and arrangement of guns still classified them technically as frigates. The US navy at the time had no ships-of-the-line so they built a few of these super frigates. I have also visited US museums, including visiting USS Constitution in Boston. American accounts of Constitution's battles do not deny this, but they just don't mention it. That is the only very minor difference I have seen in accounts of those wars between British and American accounts at museums.

What you describe about university history courses is, unfortunately, a rarity these days. Heck, it was a rarity when I took history courses as an undergraduate in the 1970s. Some are worse than others but universities today tend to indoctrinate rather than educate, and that is fast becoming a problem in public schools as well. A poll last year showed that 71% of public school parents in NC were concerned about political indoctrination of their children in the public schools.

I doubt there are many public schools today, even in the South that teach students both the Southern and Northern perspective on the War Between the States. That is one of those areas of slanted history, historically based on politics. When I was in school, we aat least got the southern perspective in our state history class, but in US history it was strictly the northern version.

Commented: Thursday, May 2nd, 2024 @ 5:04 pm By: John Steed

And I will add, automatically disqualifying a person from a job is an "ism". Giving a person a chance to show they can do it is the opposite.
Therefore DEI is the opposite of any "ism" you care to discuss.

Commented: Thursday, May 2nd, 2024 @ 3:00 pm By: Big Bob

Only to the extent that it would be rare to find one FAA air traffic controller applicant who checks all those boxes, but it would not be uncommon to check two or three or even four. How are some of these categories even going to function as an air traffic controller? A blind controller who can't see situations out the control tower windows or see the sweep of the radar screen? A deaf controller who cannot hear the radio communications with pilots? And how is someone with a severe intellectual disability or a psychiatric disorder going to appropriately comprehend what is going on? DEI categories like that endanger the flying public. There have already been some near misses, so how long until people die from these insane DEI policies at the Biden FAA?

Commented: Thursday, May 2nd, 2024 @ 10:48 am By: Rino Hunter

JS - Yeah, you've hit the nail on the head. Objectivity seems to be virtually unknown to the "woke." The "woke" one on this thread constantly does all the things he accuses others of doing.

He makes judgements and even puts words in the mouths of others to fit his narrative, so it conforms to his assumptions. He brings race into everything. It's kind of a flip side to the white racism of years gone by and just as nauseous. I'm no psychiatrist, but it is kind of like him becoming the bad thing he heard about. There is no need to go on with all the examples throughout these pages. They are many and are there for all to see.

The thing that is relevant is that there are a number of people every bit as confused (or whatever) as the example on this thread. Put them together with the people responsible for the cultural plunder, like this West Point example, and we have a dangerous situation in our country. At a time like this it is important for sane people of good will to step forward.

Commented: Thursday, May 2nd, 2024 @ 10:13 am By: Van Zant

JS - you clearly agree with CV. You have a right to be wrong.

For a moment, let's talk objectivity - if you can, please explain what that looks like as it applies to human history. The implication is a right and wrong interpretation of human events.

Sure some facts are somewhat objective.. Example: The American Revolution did indeed happen. However, the how, why, when and significants of, all change depending on who you ask. If you only ask decedents of white Europeans, you only get one perspective.

And that isn't history.

Commented: Thursday, May 2nd, 2024 @ 9:57 am By: Big Bob

Actually van ZANt, he didn't. Why?
He views, (to use his term) 'objective history", through his lens and his experience. Anything outside his experience he deems slanted history or propaganda.

In America, white people do this all time. they often assume their version of "history" is objective (it isn't) and therefore more true and relevant than the historical perspectives of other people and cultures (they aren't).
For that to be true, it would mean we all experience the world in the exact same way. Utter nonsense, right?

CV has a right to his world view. We all do. The question is, should we consider history from more than one point of view.? Cv says no. I say yes. That, in a nut shell is why his explanation is piss poor.

Now if you believe it's possible to have a monopoly on the truth, as CV does, it offers the comfort of a safe space to marginalize a large segment of the population. What gives anyone the right to do that?

Commented: Wednesday, May 1st, 2024 @ 10:58 pm By: Big Bob

Just wanted to say that I love your content. Keep up the good work.

My friend Jordan from Thailand Nomads recommended your website to me.

Cheers,
Virginia

Commented: Wednesday, May 1st, 2024 @ 6:57 pm By: Virginia Hamlin

CV did a real good job of explaining the way history is approached by people and societies. That used to be taught in University History Department graduate courses (don't know about these days of wokeness).

A good number of commenters on this thread have displayed a strong background and understanding of history. With all due respect, the far-left troll is a bit over his head here. To his credit, he is trying. I suspect he could learn a great deal from this experience if he weren't such an idealogue. Fanatics often times are hindered by their zealotry in the pursuit of learning. Hate is also an unfortunate obstacle. Passion is good. Hate is poison.

It is too bad what is happening at West Point. A healthy society builds on its history and tradition. These days we are not a healthy society, and these types of things are indicative of our decline. If we do not rebound, I hate to think of what may become of us.

Commented: Wednesday, May 1st, 2024 @ 8:38 pm By: Van Zant

CV fails to see that History is told through a lens.

Example: Lets say two people want to learn about the Vietnam war.
One American living in the US
One Vietnamese living in Ho Chi Minh City
Does any one think these two will learn the same history of events and/or lessons from that war?
Same war.
But 2 perspectives.

Is one right, and the other wrong. No
Are both perspectives worth hearing about? Yes.

Clear as a bell.

Commented: Wednesday, May 1st, 2024 @ 2:30 pm By: Big Bob

So, a total of $4 Billion dollars we don't have and will have to borrow goes to beinging in migrants we don't need and particularly in the case of the Gazans, should not want. That does not include all the resettlement benefits that will be lavished on those Gazan migrants at taxpayer expense. These provisions of that bill are a betrayal of the American taxpayer, and Mike Johnson has shown himself to be little more than a pathetic pawn of the big spending Democrats. He is worse than shifty McCarthy.

Commented: Wednesday, May 1st, 2024 @ 1:28 pm By: Concerned Taxpayer