Comments for President Trump Nominates Brett Kavanaugh to Sit on the Supreme Court | Eastern North Carolina Now

Comments for President Trump Nominates Brett Kavanaugh to Sit on the Supreme Court

Justice Anthony Kennedy will retire at the end of this 2018 session of the United States Supreme Court, and President Donald J.Trump has appointed Judge Brett Kavanaugh, of the United States Court of Appeals; District of Columbia Circuit, to take his place.

Bobby Tony, I dig you fain self-promotion; it humors me greatly.

I, moreover, appreciate your "taking the bait", because, I definitely, nay, desperately need your to lend a little class to BCN ... or was that crass? Hmmmmm.
Commented: Friday, July 20th, 2018 @ 9:53 am By: Stan Deatherage
It is most difficult to place myself in the position of a judge, which requires some degree of objectivity, which everyone know I struggle with. But in the interest of self promotion and a natural craving for attention, I have taken the bait and added a few additional exchanges and posted them in a new post at the link below.

beaufortcountynow.com
Commented: Thursday, July 19th, 2018 @ 6:51 pm By: Bobby Tony
Bobby Tony! This is gold.

Spin this into a post that we can post, then re-post to a higher position ... then re-post to a higher position ...etc.

What a timeless juxtaposition of the banal.
Commented: Thursday, July 19th, 2018 @ 11:22 am By: Stan Deatherage
BT Crystal Ball gazing:

Scene: Judicial Hearing for Brett Kavanaugh

Sen. I. B. A. Blowhard (D): Do you commit to recuse yourself in any case that may come before you that involves the President, Russia, abortion, immigration, health care or any Election of the United States of America.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh: Senator thank you for that question. I will apply the Peter Strzok Bias-threshold principle to any actions I may take regarding any case that would come before me should I be confirmed to the Supreme Court.
Commented: Sunday, July 15th, 2018 @ 8:47 am By: Bobby Tony
Your point is well taken. It is most difficult to maintain optimism in today's environment, but like the two boys trying to explain why there was so much sh!t around, I choose to be the one who believes there must be a pony around somewhere.

I agree the experiment of socialism has been tried and failed by some of the most rightous and pius of citizens.

townhall.com
Commented: Friday, July 13th, 2018 @ 7:29 pm By: Bobby Tony
You are correct on many issues here, but, you may be a bit more of a Pollyanna than even me: The Founders did not trust the American People then, and right now, there are many I don't trust either that have enough common sense to vote.

I know that the Founders were extra-wise to devise the Electoral College allowing the states to pick the president, but, the condition of owning property to qualify one to vote was a credible solution to conditionally thwart the debilitating disease of Socialism and stupidity at the ballot box.

Socialism was an old unworkable practice, even back in colonial times.
Commented: Friday, July 13th, 2018 @ 6:44 pm By: Stan Deatherage
I grant that universal suffrage in voting tends to initially favor the Democrats, but once that group begins to experience the American Dream, they will discard the nanny state. I base this on the fact that many of them are in fact leaving the very type of government that the Democrats are trying to create here.

Even though the founders themselves tried to gerrymander the qualifications for voting, I can't help but believe that they had ultimate faith in the common sense of a voting public to be able to listen, read and discuss various opinions and collectively come to a reasonable conclusion. I base this on the knowledge that once they had set up the elective system, they proceeded to tear into each other in print, speech and innuendo without any qualms relating to truthfulness.

I assume that makes me extremely naive in believing that Nixon's Silent Majority eventually came to the conclusion that he was indeed a crook and as a result he lost the support of even the most ardent Republican partisans. At some point, I expect the Left Leaning Liberals will eventually come to the same conclusion regarding Democratic –Socialism.

On second thought, I guess that faith will confirm my naivety or stupidity regarding the human ability to self-govern ourselves. My biggest fear is that we have strayed from the Constitutional protections under assault by activist judges and the reversal of that trend my be this administrations greatest contribution to our history. Time will tell.
Commented: Thursday, July 12th, 2018 @ 7:49 am By: Bobby Tony
The problem with the eligibility of voters, and why core Democrats have such a problem with voter identification is that making voters provide an ID would probably frighten some of the Non citizens that they literally cart to the polls, plus it would probably stop their voting of dead people.

Think about it: Why are core Democrats encouraging Open Borders and voting non citizens in some states. It is starting to fit together as a non patriot puzzle to elect more stupid, actually, the stupidest of politicians.
Commented: Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 6:11 pm By: Stan Deatherage
We have been debating voting requirements since the beginning and I doubt we will ever reach a mutually acceptable conclusion. Everyone sees an opportunity to increase their power by tinkering with the eligibility of voters. That is one of the main reasons I am in favor of very limited government because we just can't trust human nature when they have access to the power of control.

Chapter 5. Was the Founding Undemocratic? The Property Requirement for Voting

www.vindicatingthefounders.com
Commented: Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 11:54 am By: Bobby Tony
Good short comment on a very strong truth. Core Democrats vote dead people ... and non citizens; much more than anyone realizes. In fact, California and Maryland, in some counties, are allowing non citizens to vote.

Their logic is that these issues affect non citizens, even Illegals too.
Commented: Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 11:22 am By: Stan Deatherage
Just for clarification, I have voted in every election since I was first Eligible in 1964. In all but the presidential elections the majority wins. For that reason I was taught to always be in the "counted votes column" regardless of the turnout or the issues.

Here is a joke post from one of my non-published articles on citizenship. Hopefully people see the humor in this and not the sinister ramifications.

Commented: Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 10:15 am By: Bobby Tony
Bobby Tony, you just elaborated on the essentials of what is the essence of a republic - this Republic. That is why elections matter so much.

Just think what it would be like if all you had to vote for was Susan Collins or Lisa Murkowski. It is better here in North Carolina, but not good enough by half.
Commented: Tuesday, July 10th, 2018 @ 6:39 pm By: Stan Deatherage
I was going to weigh in on this subject because I have an Opinion on Brett Kavanaugh, but it does not really matter now, so I thought I would just comment on this article.

It dawned on me when I recently started a review of the record of Brett Kavanaugh who is Donald Trump's nomination for the Supreme Court that I don't really have a vote in this upcoming battle. I may have some influence based on the degree I wish to voice my opinion but I don't have a Vote.

As I have aged I find that I have increasingly had time to study the founding principles of our government. As a younger man I did not have the time or interest to delve into the minutia of day to day political decisions. I often thought that the basic GENIUS of our system of government lay in the idea that we could elect people who would study and become proficient in the mechanics of running a government. So it should come as no surprise to me that this PRIVILEGE (some would call it an AFFLICTION) of voting is the very foundation upon which our country is built and the reason we have existed for 240 plus years. We get to vote and elect those we wish to make most of the decisions for us. We are given recurring opportunities every two years to assert our wishes on the elected officials who serve at our leisure. If I have a serious difference of opinion on how those elected officials behave or vote, I and my fellow citizens have a signed document which prescribes the exact remedy for almost any situation that is likely to occur.

My real chance to influence the direction of the Supreme Court or the country for that matter occurred in 2004 & 2010 & 2016 when I voted for Johnny Isakson for Senator from Georgia. It occurred again in 2014 when I voted for David Perdue for Senator from Georgia. It finally occurred again in 2016 when I voted for Donald Trump for President of the United States. Below are the three people that I selected to pass judgement on Brett Kavanaugh. I doubt I had ever heard the name when I selected these people, but I was not selecting Brett Kavanaugh, I was selecting someone who I expected to provide the due diligence that I had not taken the time to complete.

• US Senator: Johnny Isakson 2004, 2010, 2016,
• US Senator: David Perdue 2014
• President of the United States: Donald Trump 2016

So my only official influence in this matter occurred in just four visits to the polls. I won't have another chance for these three officials until 2020 & 2022. That kinda of makes my current opinion mute on the subject of Brett Kavanaugh. It might be well for others to remember that this is not a "Johnny come Lately" event. It started all the way back in 1788 when the whole process was ratified.

In the final analysis, you should feel free to march, protest, bitch and moan, celebrate or just ignore it all. After all each of us has three people who will make the choice now and perhaps we should have thought about that when we elected them to ride up top of the Stage.

I am tempted to repeat the Abraham Lincoln's quote about Opinions but I'm not positive he ever said it. Maybe I should GOOGLE it so I won't be accused of posting FAKE NEWS!

I was pretty satisfied when Ronaldo Maximus was up on top of the Stage and so Far I think The Donald is doing a passable job.

Commented: Tuesday, July 10th, 2018 @ 1:20 pm By: Bobby Tony
Liberals /Socialists consider the Supreme Court a political body, as the third, less significant, branch of the United States Government. Alternatively, Liberals /Socialists see the Supreme Court as the most significant branch of government, from which they can wield the power to transform our nation from a Constitutional Republic to a Socialist Democracy.
Commented: Tuesday, July 10th, 2018 @ 11:09 am By: Stan Deatherage
Older     

HbAD0

 
Back to Top