Regions Cast Different Votes | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: This article appeared on John Hood's daily column in the Carolina Journal, which, because of Author / Publisher Hood, is linked to the John Locke Foundation.

\
John Hood
    RALEIGH     If Republican Thom Tillis were running for the U.S. Senate from the state of North Piedmont, he'd be clearly favored to defeat incumbent Democrat Kay Hagan. Alternatively, if Hagan represented the state of Trianglia, she'd be such a shoo-in that we'd all lose interest in the race.

    No, I'm not pining for a breakup of my native state (if back in the land of my ancestors, I'd have voted to keep Scotland in the United Kingdom). I'm delighted that North Carolina encompasses diverse communities. Indeed, to understand our state's politics in the 21st century is to recognize that differences in history, economics, and demographics produce marked differences in political preference.

    Two recent statewide polls, one by left-leaning Public Policy Polling and the other commissioned by the right-leaning Civitas Institute, demonstrate the effect. For starters, their topline results are similar. PPP has Hagan leading Tillis by 4 points in the Senate race, with Republicans (44 percent) and Democrats (43 percent) roughly tied in statewide preference for state legislature. Civitas puts Hagan's lead at 3 points and has the GOP slightly leading Democrats statewide in a comparable question about down-ballot races.

    When you drill down into the results by region, a fascinating pattern emerges. Among voters in the 919 area code, roughly corresponding to the Triangle area, Hagan has a double-digit lead in both surveys. In the Piedmont Triad (336 area code), the Charlotte region (704 area code), southeastern counties (910), and the coastal plain (252), Tillis had a double-digit lead over Hagan. In the western mountains (828), the race is close.

    The pattern persists down the ballot. In most of North Carolina, Republicans are in a stronger position than Democrats in the generic vote for legislature or congress. In the Triangle, however, Democrats have a sizable lead. This corresponds with what we know about party strategy and specific contests. Democrats are investing heavily in the state's most populous county, Wake, in hopes of picking up seats in both houses of the General Assembly. At the same time, some Republicans in potentially competitive districts elsewhere in the state either drew no Democratic challenger this year or enjoy large advantages in funding and organization.

    To some extent, these regional dynamics reflect long-standing trends. Even when Republicans were a clear minority party in North Carolina, they were often competitive in a swath of Piedmont counties running north from Charlotte along I-77 and I-85. In the Triangle, Durham and Orange counties have been core Democratic constituencies for decades.

    But today's differences are so pronounced that I think they also reflect factors specific to the 2014 election cycle. While you can find liberal pushback against the General Assembly's passage of conservative legislation, only in the Triangle media market has it received saturation coverage. State government is a local story there, where public employees make up a disproportionate share of the workforce. In the rest of the state, the idea that North Carolina might pick its next U.S. senator based on what the state legislature did in 2013 strikes many voters as odd. To them, Hagan's record on such issues as federal spending, Obamacare, military veterans, and foreign policy seems more relevant — and damning.

    The political consequences of domestic immigration have changed, as well. From the 1960s to the 1990s, the influx of newcomers from the Northeast and the Midwest helped power the rise of the Republican Party in North Carolina. I remember a time in the mid-1990s when not a single county GOP chairman from Charlotte to Durham had a Southern drawl. More recently, however, newcomers have leaned more Democratic. They tipped the state into Barack Obama's column in 2008, for example.

    It remains impossible to predict this year's electoral outcomes with any confidence. Hagan has opened up a statewide lead but remains in danger with her support averaging about 44 percent. And Republicans may do worse in legislative races than the current polling would suggest. Still, North Carolina's political diversity will persist. Many voters will see the election results and wonder how "that person" could ever have won, given that nearly everyone they know voted for the other one.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comment

( September 23rd, 2014 @ 6:35 pm )
 
I have lived in NC / SC / GA. Each state is somewhat unique. Only GA is larger than NC in population and area. The big difference in GA population is Metro Atlanta with its some 8+ million residents.

Since my birth in 1946, it was a given that the "South voted Democratic." The main reason was what FDR did for the farmers to save them from the Depression. Then in the 50's industry moved South, mainly because of a lack of Unions and lower cost of living. That began a large influx of Republicans from, mostly, the North and Mid-West.

From the mouth of Lyndon Johnson as he signed legislation voting rights and War on Poverty came these words: "Well, there goes the South to the Republicans!" He was a political master, no matter what else he was. I believe he hit the nail on the head!

Let's face it---the prejudices of race are still a big factor. To a person, Republicans want to say the color of the President is no factor. Among the many political lies said, that is the one furthest from the truth. The black vote for a black presidential candidate was a serious factor. Before, the religious conservative vote was a big factor for Reagan and the Bushes.

It was an assumption that "Conservative" means conserving everything. Frankly, I haven't seen much "conserving" in recent years. The Supreme Court is now packed with "conservative" Justices giving "conservative" rulings and appointed by "Conservative Republican Presidents."

NC has, in the past, been a "PROGRESSIVE" state. The rapid growth of Research Triangle and East Carolina Medical School have had tremendous growth for those parts of this state. Textiles have gone away. That is attributed to NAFTA rather than Reganomics. NAFTA was a Clinton measure. The current tax code favoring corps and the rich is a Republican concept.

I am INDEPENDENT and cherish my ability to step back from Party and vote for Candidate. My personal and business strife are directly attributable to the crash of the US Economy under Bush and Reaganomics.



What's to be done about "low-productivity" degree programs? Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Bogus argument: "We must elect Tillis to get rid of Harry Reid"


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

populist / nationalist anti-immigration AfD most popular party among young voters, CDU second
Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump

HbAD1

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.
Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top