How The Legislature Could Craft Better Education Laws | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Sarah Curry, who is Director of Fiscal Policy Studies for the John Locke Foundation.

    During each legislative session, education is at the forefront of budget and policy discussions. Expenditures on elementary, secondary, and higher education (the University of North Carolina system plus the community college system) added up to more than $11.5 billion last year, or 58 percent of the North Carolina General Fund budget.

    Oddly, the legislature has made it difficult to spend that money wisely. The reason: in each house a single standing education committee must cover it all — UNC, community colleges, and K-12.

    That means that the House Education committee and the Senate Education/Higher Education committee have heavy workloads. They constantly scramble to cover subjects that often have very little to do with one another. A typical education committee meeting — designed to inform legislators so they can shape new laws — has multiple speakers presenting information, sometimes as many as six presentations packed into a two-hour time limit.

    Speakers are often rushed, details can be overlooked, and there is little time to absorb the material or to get extended answers to questions. With the high public profile of primary and secondary education, it is probably fair to say that higher education gets short shrift — especially community colleges, which almost seem to come up as an afterthought.

    As the North Carolina General Assembly convenes for the new session, however, leadership in both the House and the Senate are considering splitting the standing education committee in two. One committee would focus on K-12 education and another on higher education, which would include the UNC system and the community college system.

    Splitting each education committee into two would double the amount of time available for education issues. It would give committee members the time and expertise to drill down on the important issues facing North Carolina's schools.

    Even more important than balancing the workload of the committees is allowing legislators to specialize in particular areas of education. To craft laws effectively, some legislators should become experts. With such diverse systems — K-12 teaches 1.5 million students, UNC, just 220,000, and community colleges nearly half a million — one-size-fits-all policy solutions don't work.

    As it stands now, members of the committees must be generalists. Thus, little time is left for the details — and laws are all about details and unintended consequences when the details aren't right.

    The issues that surround each level of education are quite different. Discussions of school transportation are important, but of little interest to those whose focus is higher education. Likewise, college tuition assistance for veterans is irrelevant to those who focus on elementary and secondary education test scores.

    The K-12 system decides much of its curriculum centrally. But UNC schools, departments, and even individual professors have wide latitude to decide what to teach and how to teach it.

    So, while the legislature mandates the number of credit-hours that professors should teach at the UNC schools, it rarely, if ever, steps into the area of specific curriculum requirements. In contrast, the legislature delves into topics such as the teaching of U. S. History in Advanced Placement high school classes and the Read to Achieve program, which requires summer sessions for third-graders who can't pass a key reading test.

    Funding varies as well. For example, North Carolina's K-12 system is supported primarily through state appropriations, whereas the UNC System receives more than half of its funding from sources other than the state, including student tuition, donors, and the federal government.

    Creating two distinct committees would put an end to the problems of lack of time, lack of expertise, and a tendency to one-size-fits all policies.

    This is not a new idea, and was practiced for many years in the legislature (as this list of past standing committees indicates). Historically, the Senate and the House each had multiple education committees to allow legislators the time and focus for the specifics of each level of education.

    Occasionally, issues arise that affect both areas. Teacher training and remediation in higher education are two of the most critical. Dual enrollment, AP standards, and SAT scores are also pertinent to higher education as well as K-12. This change would not take common concerns off the table; in fact, it would ensure that such concerns were heard thoroughly from both secondary and postsecondary perspectives.

    Education affects nearly every resident of North Carolina. Such important and costly programs deserve more time and attention at the General Assembly. Splitting the education committees would accomplish that goal.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Waste of the Week: Museum of Natural Sciences John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Governor McCrory Announces Deal to Sell Dorothea Dix Property


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

most voters think EU officials not doing a good job on illegal immigration
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it
Come from behind by GOP candidate is a blueprint to 2024
Biden spending and energy policies to blame
Tuberculosis carried by illegal invaders has already infected Texas cattle

HbAD1

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said this week that the only campaign promise President Joe Biden has delivered on as president is the complete dismantling of the U.S. southern border.
Hamas is reeling after losing two of their most cherished leaders on the same day: military commander Saleh al-Arouri, and Harvard President Claudine Gay.
President Joe Biden’s brother told the Internal Revenue Service that Hunter Biden told him he was in business with a “protege of President Xi,” referring to the leader of China, according to notes by an IRS investigator that were divulged during a congressional interview of Jim Biden.
Gov. Roy Cooper seeks a temporary restraining order to block a law changing the composition of the State Board of Elections.
X owner Elon Musk mocked a news segment from ABC News this week that promoted President Joe Biden’s talking points about the Democrat-led Senate’s failed border bill, which critics and many experts have said would make the situation on the border worse.
That’s the question Marguerite Roza of Georgetown University’s Edunomics Lab sought to answer in a recent webinar on the topic.

HbAD2

The University of Florida has fired all of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) employees and shut down its DEI office.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top