Streetcar Line A Political Project | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Michael Lowrey, who is a Contributor for the Carolina Journal, John Hood Publisher.

    The city of Charlotte really wants to build a streetcar line. Queen City taxpayers probably will have to dig a bit deeper to pay for it, though, as construction bids have come in over 30 percent above projections. Such overages should come as no surprise, given the history of transit projects in general and the specifics of this project in particular.
    Mecklenburg County has a dedicated sales tax to pay for the Charlotte Area Transit System's capital needs and to cover the operating losses of its rail and bus network. Though CATS will build and operate the streetcar, no transit tax money is going to it. Instead, the city of Charlotte is responsible for financing the project and covering its operating losses. That's a particular concern for the city as the federal government is paying $75 million toward the streetcar line's second phase, and all costs beyond that fall entirely on the city.

    Bids have come in over budget. As the Charlotte Observer reports, the city had estimated the cost of the line plus some city-funded related improvements at $93.2 million. It received two bids for the work, one at $123.3 million, the other at $128.5 million, both more than 30 percent above the city's estimate.

    Such cost overruns are par for the course. Over the past decade and a half, a series of academic journal articles has demonstrated that costs routinely are underestimated and benefits overstated to get transportation projects approved.

    For example, in a seminal 2002 article in the Journal of the American Planning Association, Bent Flyvbjerg, Mette Skamris Holm, and Søren Buhl of Aalborg University described the results of a large-scale statistical analysis of transportation project cost overruns. Their article was titled "Underestimating Cost in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie."

    The researchers compared the estimated cost of projects at the time the decision was made to proceed to their final actual cost. Flyvbjerg and company's dataset included 258 projects costing $90 billion over 70 years.

    The authors found that costs were underestimated in 86 percent of projects, with the average overrun varying by project type. Rail projects came in on average 44.7 percent over their estimated costs, larger than the cost overruns in fixed-link (tunnel and bridge), at 33.8 percent, or road projects (20.4 percent).

    Significantly, projects in the 1990s were just as likely as projects in the 1920s to come in over budget. As the authors note, "underestimation today is in the same order of magnitude as it was 10, 30, and 70 years ago." It is as if project administrators had learned nothing from earlier projection errors. Based upon their analysis, the authors concluded that these original cost estimates were off not because of methodological errors, but rather because the project proponents were engaging in deception - lying - to get projects approved.

    "Legislators, administrators, bankers, media representatives, and members of the public who value honest numbers should not trust the cost estimates presented by infrastructure promoters and forecasters," they wrote.

    Indeed, we've even seen it before in Charlotte. The Queen City's first light rail line, running roughly from Pineville to Uptown was projected in 1998 to cost $227 million. The actual cost came in at over twice that amount.

    Charlotte's streetcar Gold Line is a strange project. The Gold Line really isn't a transportation solution. The streetcars run on rails set in the car traffic lanes of major streets and stop for red lights, making them no faster than buses, while also being less flexible and more expensive to operate.

    In actuality, the Gold Line is a politically motivated economic development scheme. Asking hard questions about its costs wouldn't improve its chances of winning community support, and for that city taxpayers are likely to suffer.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




How 'bout Them Redistricting Apples Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Governor McCrory Receives Briefing, Urges Residents To Exercise Caution And Prepare For Storm


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

far left sugar daddy has also funded anti-Israel groups and politicians in US
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it
America needs to wake up and get its priorities right
Former President Donald Trump suggested this week that if he becomes president again, he might allow Prince Harry to be deported.
It's a New Year, which means it's time to make resolutions — even for prominent evangelical leaders. The Babylon Bee asked the following well-known figures in the faith what they hope to accomplish in 2024:
Vice President Kamala Harris will visit a Minnesota Planned Parenthood clinic, reportedly the first time a president or vice president has visited an abortion facility.

HbAD1

An eight-mile stretch of the Blue Ridge Parkway near Asheville has been temporarily closed due to a string of “human and bear interactions,” the National Parks Service announced.
University of Wisconsin tried to punish conservatives for the fact that liberals regularly commit crimes to silence opposition
most voters think EU officials not doing a good job on illegal immigration
Come from behind by GOP candidate is a blueprint to 2024
Biden spending and energy policies to blame

HbAD2

Tuberculosis carried by illegal invaders has already infected Texas cattle

HbAD3

 
Back to Top