Wall Street Journal: ‘State AGs for rent.’ What about N.C.? | Eastern NC Now

The Wall Street Journal warns of a troubling new scheme. It gives privately funded environmental litigator/activists (who are unaccountable to the people) state police power

ENCNow
    Publisher's note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal, and written by Jon Sanders, director of regulatory studies at the John Locke Foundation.

    The Wall Street Journal warns of a troubling new scheme. It gives privately funded environmental litigator/activists (who are unaccountable to the people) state police power:

  • In August 2017 the NYU outfit emailed then-New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's office that demonstrated how the new attorneys would be used. These privately funded staffers would work out of an AG's office for two years and deliver quarterly progress reports to the State Energy and Environmental Impact Center. ...
  • In the New York case, a special interest is funding staffers who could wield state law-enforcement power to punish opponents.
  • The State Energy and Environmental Impact Center made clear that state AG offices would only qualify for special assistant AGs if they "demonstrate a need and commitment to defending environmental values and advancing progressive clean energy, climate change, and environmental legal positions," according to the August 2017 email to numerous AGs. Mr. Schneiderman's office suggested in its application for the fellows that it "needs additional attorney resources to assist" in extracting compensation from fossil-fuel emitters.
  • That's exactly what's happening. ...


Attorney General Josh Stein, during a January 2017 swearing-in ceremony at the Executive Mansion. (CJ photo by Don Carrington)

    Blatant ethical problems

    WSJ points out that so far "at least" seven other AG offices have signed on to this scheme, the others being Maryland, Massachusetts, Oregon, Washington, Illinois, New Mexico, and the District of Columbia.

    They warn:

  • The ethical problems here should be obvious. Private interests are leveraging the police powers of the state to pursue their political agenda, while a government official is letting private interests appear to influence enforcement decisions. None of this is reassuring about the fair administration of justice.

    What about North Carolina?

    In order for a state attorney general to "qualify" for outside agitators using his office's police powers to pursue their private agenda,* the AG must "demonstrate a need and commitment to defending environmental values and advancing progressive clean energy, climate change, and environmental legal positions."

    Just in the past two weeks, N.C. Attorney General Josh Stein has joined with all those AGs identified by the WSJ above, plus a few others, in high-profile, national environmental fights:


    Is that "demonstrating" fealty sufficient for this special-interest outfit? Would Gov. Roy Cooper's "climate change" executive order also play a role in demonstrating fealty?

    Anyone interested in constitutional, accountable, transparent government - anyone interested in good government - should hope Stein stays far away from this dangerous scheme and any similar ones.

    * Even if you like the particular private agenda, think about the corruption and dangerous precedent-setting of such a practice!
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Restorative Justice Focuses on Healing, Not Punishment Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Janice Rogers Brown: an Inspired Choice for Attorney General


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

government's offer is rejected, the battle continues, no confidence vote in parliament

HbAD1


HbAD2

Understanding how parties work is important for making informed decisions regarding elected officials.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top