Panning Twitter’s Fact-Check Policy | Eastern North Carolina Now

David Harsanyi explains at National Review Online why Twitter’s new fact checks for high-profile tweets amount to “folly.”

ENCNow
Publisher's note: The author of this post is Mitch Kokai for the John Locke Foundation.

    David Harsanyi explains at National Review Online why Twitter's new fact checks for high-profile tweets amount to "folly."

  • No American, not even the president, has an inherent right to a social-media account. Tech companies such as Facebook and Twitter are free to ban any user they see fit. They're free to fact-check anyone they want, to create a framework of acceptable speech, and to enforce their policies either consistently or capriciously. They're free to accuse Donald Trump - and only Trump, if they see fit - of being a liar. They're free to do all of these things.
  • Even if they shouldn't. ...
  • ... It's a mistake for any platform to drop its neutral stance and take on fact-checking duties, a task that's going to be impossible to accomplish either objectively or effectively. It's going to corrode trust in the brand, but it won't change a single mind.
  • Once Twitter begins tagging some tweets and not others with "what you need to know," it will be staking out partisan positions. The Trump tweets that precipitated its first election-related fact-check are a good example of this. It would have been far more reasonable for the social-media giant to label Trump's ugly and libelous tweets about Joe Scarborough as misleading. Instead, Twitter decided to inaugurate its policy by alleging that Trump had dishonestly claimed that mail-in ballots would lead to "a Rigged Election."
  • Even if this contention were entirely baseless, it would be as untrue as saying Russia rigged the election - a claim that politicians such as Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi, along with most major media outlets, have been making for years. But while the president's rhetoric about voting is debatable, it is also well within the normal parameters of contemporary political discourse.

    Follow Carolina Journal Online's continuing coverage of North Carolina's response to the COVID-19 pandemic HERE.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




A War Against ‘Normal’ John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Virtual Charter School Has Received 3,100 Applications for 403 Available Seats


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

"Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a foolish man, full of foolish and vapid ideas," former Governor Chris Christie complained.
Bureaucrats believe they set policy for spending taxpayer dollars usurping the directions of elected officials.
would allow civil lawsuit against judge if released criminal causes harm

HbAD1

"This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter narco-terror operations."
Charlie Kirk, 31 years of age, who was renowned as one of the most important and influential college speakers /Leaders in many decades; founder of Turning Point USA, has been shot dead at Utah Valley University.
The Trump administration took actions against Harvard related to the anti-Israel protests that roiled its campus.
In remembrance of the day that will forever seer the concept of 'evil' in our minds, let's look back at that fateful morning, exactly 11 years ago today to that series of horrific events which unfolded before our unbelieving eyes......

HbAD2

faced 25 years in prison for "misgendering" a leftie tranny politician
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
It was a clear beautiful, royal blue sky day on Wall Street. The S & P futures were up markedly, awaiting a positive open, as I turn to get my first cup of coffee. I return to CNBC to get the morning business news, when I notice that the S & P futures are falling, and they're falling fast.
conservative youth leader was victim of political assassination

HbAD3

 
Back to Top