Panning Twitter’s Fact-Check Policy | Eastern NC Now

David Harsanyi explains at National Review Online why Twitter’s new fact checks for high-profile tweets amount to “folly.”

ENCNow
Publisher's note: The author of this post is Mitch Kokai for the John Locke Foundation.

    David Harsanyi explains at National Review Online why Twitter's new fact checks for high-profile tweets amount to "folly."

  • No American, not even the president, has an inherent right to a social-media account. Tech companies such as Facebook and Twitter are free to ban any user they see fit. They're free to fact-check anyone they want, to create a framework of acceptable speech, and to enforce their policies either consistently or capriciously. They're free to accuse Donald Trump - and only Trump, if they see fit - of being a liar. They're free to do all of these things.
  • Even if they shouldn't. ...
  • ... It's a mistake for any platform to drop its neutral stance and take on fact-checking duties, a task that's going to be impossible to accomplish either objectively or effectively. It's going to corrode trust in the brand, but it won't change a single mind.
  • Once Twitter begins tagging some tweets and not others with "what you need to know," it will be staking out partisan positions. The Trump tweets that precipitated its first election-related fact-check are a good example of this. It would have been far more reasonable for the social-media giant to label Trump's ugly and libelous tweets about Joe Scarborough as misleading. Instead, Twitter decided to inaugurate its policy by alleging that Trump had dishonestly claimed that mail-in ballots would lead to "a Rigged Election."
  • Even if this contention were entirely baseless, it would be as untrue as saying Russia rigged the election - a claim that politicians such as Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi, along with most major media outlets, have been making for years. But while the president's rhetoric about voting is debatable, it is also well within the normal parameters of contemporary political discourse.

    Follow Carolina Journal Online's continuing coverage of North Carolina's response to the COVID-19 pandemic HERE.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




A War Against ‘Normal’ John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Virtual Charter School Has Received 3,100 Applications for 403 Available Seats


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

permanently blocks Trump's EO to require proof of citizenship to register to vote
In genetic mouse models mirroring human pancreatic cancer, diets rich in oleic acid sped up tumor growth.

HbAD1

climate alarmism was created as a political tool, largely by the UN
Three "Democrat Socialists of America" headed to Congress in safe Democrat districts

HbAD2

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Democrat-run states have said they won’t send official delegations to the country’s 250th birthday bash
The North Carolina House unanimously passed the “Dominique Moody Safety Act,” advancing a child-welfare reform package named for the six-year-old girl whose death exposed repeated failures by Mecklenburg County social services officials to act on reports of abuse and neglect.
Maybe a holiday for Texas, but NOT the nation

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top