Judicial Watch Sues Virginia County Over Secret Democrat Officials’ Meeting on Police Response to BLM Riot | Eastern NC Now

Judicial Watch announced today that it has teamed up with residents of Prince William County, Virginia, and their Virginia law firm, McSweeney, Cynkar & Kachouroff, PLLC to file a lawsuit against members of the Prince William County Board of Supervisors

ENCNow
Press Release:

    Washington, DC     Judicial Watch announced today that it has teamed up with residents of Prince William County, Virginia, and their Virginia law firm, McSweeney, Cynkar & Kachouroff, PLLC to file a lawsuit against members of the Prince William County Board of Supervisors regarding a violation of Virginia's open meetings law. The lawsuit was filed in Prince William County Circuit Court (Gloss, et al. v. Wheeler, et al. (No. 20-7521)).

    On Saturday night May 30, various protests and rioting occurred in Prince William County, resulting in numerous injuries to police officers and extensive property damage. Police officers reportedly used tear gas, pepper spray and rubber bullets to disperse the crowd. The next day, a meeting of the police department's Citizen Advisory Board was held. All five Democrat supervisors attended the meeting, but the board's three Republican members were not notified of the meeting and did not attend. The individual who chairs the Citizen's Advisory Board is the husband of one of the Democrat supervisors.

    As explained in the lawsuit, the Democrat supervisors violated Virginia's Freedom of Information Act/open meeting law by holding a meeting in secret, without notice any Republican supervisor nor advance notice to the public as required by law. Virginia law prohibits any gathering of two or more members of the same public body if public business is transacted or discussed. While no votes were cast during the meeting, the Democrat members posed questions and provided directives to the police leadership to curtail the use of crowd control measures in future disturbances. As set forth in the lawsuit, this constituted a discussion of public business in violation of Virginia Code section 2.2.-3707(A).

    "Now, more than ever, citizens need transparency in their government. Secret meetings on police policy undermines public confidence and violates the law," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




NY Post Offers Warning About Government Stimulus Judicial Watch Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Judicial Watch Sues for HHS Records of Sales of Unusable Respirator Masks to the Indian Health Service


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

government agencies refused to help on fear of being called "racist"
targets data centers and intermittent electricity sources

HbAD1

5 year sentence for failing to cooperate with surveillance of cit citizens
"He is fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State."
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD2

she was actually 86, and says she did not vote in the 51 elections records show
"We are leveraging counterterrorism tools and global partnerships to deter this threat before it metastasizes," an official shared.
The impressions of our youth are indelibly branded in our hearts and minds. As I think of June 6, 1944 (D Day) it always seems that it was my war. I was nine years old.
Not giving our kids their own devices was one of the best parenting decisions my husband and I made.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top