The Clash of Constitutions

Latest Polls (view all)

Where do you stand on the Transgender Issue now that the issue has gotten to the overt point of the open celebration of this lifestyle choice, dictated by certain direct and explicit actions.

91.07% I do not approve of behavior that has within its expressed tenants policies that harm children.

8.04% I do support the Trans Community in all its many facets because diversity is at a premium in today's society.

0.89% What is a "Children's Drag Queen Story Hour?"

Click Here to Vote
112 Vote(s)

View all Polls

The Clash of Constitutions

Published: Wednesday, October 28th, 2020 @ 4:29 am
By: John Locke Foundation ( More Entries )

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

John McGinnis writes at Law and Liberty about two competing views of the U.S. Constitution.

The Senate hearing on the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court shows that we effectively have two different Constitutions today, because the interpretive methodologies of Democratic and Republican political actors diverge so dramatically. Republicans embrace originalism as a mode of interpretation. Democrats aspire to a method that bends the Constitution toward "the moral arc of the universe" where that arc traces the parabola of progressive politics.

The implications of this divergence are profound both for the nation and for academic debates over originalism. We are in a period of political polarization unprecedented since at least the New Deal and probably since the 19th century. Successive waves of partisanship have now engulfed our fundamental document, threatening a kind of legal instability we have not seen in the last 150 years. It will likely get worse, particularly if Democrats go through with threats of court packing, which will inevitably beget more and more court packing, turning our highest tribunal into something more resembling the British House of Lords. Academically, the dramatic divergence shows that the positive argument that originalism should be followed simply because it is our law is inadequate because high officials do not agree on the rule of recognition-that is, the standard by which we determine what constitutes constitutional law.

The hearing was, of course, full of the posturing and cynical maneuvering that politicians bring to any televised event, particularly one so close to an election. But it was genuinely illuminating on the parties' professed approach to interpretation, even though those approaches would be applied inconsistently by many politicians. The Republicans all affirmed some version of originalism or suggested following the Constitution as written, sharply separating law from politics and policy.

The Democratic Senators on the Judiciary Committee, in contrast, have never been as explicit in simultaneously rejecting originalism and embracing an expressly progressive jurisprudence.

Go Back

Login to Leave a Comment

Civil Society and the Future of American Education

John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics

Is Roy Cooper’s State Board of Elections Irredeemably Racist?

Our Members

ENCN Sign Up

BCN Home

Beaufort Observer

Portfolios

Current Events: A Historical Perspective

Current Weather

Latest Comments

Latest Polls

Featured Entries

Latest Entries

The Clash of Constitutions | Eastern NC Now

The Clash of Constitutions

Leave a Guest Comment

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

America's surveillance state arrives - and it is state and local governments responsible

Tests again show that majority of "unaccompanied minor" illegal aliens are actually adults

Newsome tries to cover up corruption in crooked California elections

Will Democrats force Graham Platner out of Maine Senate race?

Beaufort County Republicans Try to Un-Ring the Finance Bell

American Upset Caps Off Wild UFC Night

Our Founding Principles: The Beginning of the American "Experiment"

Is this why chief Justice John Roberts has long been sandbagging conservatives?

Florida bans illegal aliens from admission to state colleges and universities

It was the Biden FBI that sent a mole into Gavin Newsome's inner circle on criminal probe

French mother schedules march, calls for "war" after 5 migrant teens lynch her 17 y.o. son

Are American public schools destroying what made America great?

new poll - 62% of Democrats would vote for a socialist, Dems prefer socialism over capitalism

:Appeals Court overturns Biden judge on park services signs disparaging American heroes

General who directed Afghan withdrawal debacle is fired, and the left howls about it

Vance’s Most Trusted Adviser To Depart Trump Administration

Federal court backs Tennessee law making illegal presence by migrant a state crime

America at 250: Will we keep what we have been given?

Stein creates bipartisan healthcare affordability commission

The OnlyFans Success Story That’s Missing A Dark Reality

SCOTUS gives US citizenship to babies of Chinese birth tourists and illegal aliens

Now it is a Congress seat in CO - Far left socialist takes out another liberal Democrat in primary

Peru becomes latest Latin American country to swing to the right as conservative wins presidency

Supreme Court upholds laws restricting women's sports to REAL women and keep men out

Rally set for Raleigh to pressure RINO Senator Tillis on SAVE America Act

Maybe it is not Republican Sanitizing, Maybe it is Sanitation

Everything You Heard About Trump And NBA Finals Security Was A Lie