Don’t Let the Ninth Circuit Hijack the Google Antitrust Suit | Eastern North Carolina Now

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the LifeZette. The author of this post is Michael J. Pappas.

    Google recently requested that the blockbuster December antitrust suit filed by ten states in response to its "illegal" and "monopolistic" online advertising practices move from Texas to the Northern District of California of the Ninth Circuit.

    In its official filing, Google cited suitability as the primary reason, arguing that the Northern District court is "the venue where Google is headquartered and where more relevant witnesses and documents are located than in any other district in the country." In reality, though, the reasoning for Google's request for a re-location change appears far more conniving and calculated than creating a more thorough and accountable courtroom.

    Conservatives know all too well that the Ninth Circuit's decisions often don't align with their interests. In the past, Newt Gingrich called the court "anti-American," while Rush Limbaugh categorized it as "the Ninth Circus." At the start of his presidency, Donald Trump even advocated for its breakup.

    Most of these influencers' criticisms have stemmed from past Ninth Court decisions that were not aligned with the social conservative and paleoconservative agendas, such as its ruling against immigration restrictions and decision that "one nation under God's" place in the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional. At the same time, however, the court — which is right in Big Tech's backyard — is also known for holding a strong bias in favor of its tech giant neighbors.

    Consider last February, when — in a case that pertained to alleged discrimination by Google's YouTube — the court gave the company a crucial (albeit short-term) legal win by effectively holding that tech platforms aren't bound by the First Amendment.

    Never mind that the Supreme Court already ruled 75 years earlier that when sizable private media companies restrict "the flow of news," it can be "defeated by private restraints no less than by public censorship." The high court wrote, "it would be strange indeed...if the grave concern for freedom of the press which prompted adoption of the First Amendment should be read as a command that the government was without power to protect that freedom," especially from monopolies deemed illegal under antitrust law. Nevertheless, the Ninth Circuit, which one would think is supposed to follow legal precedents, seems to believe that it interprets the Constitution better than the highest court in the land.

    Then, of course, there was the Ninth Circuit's infamous decision in Google v. Oracle, which critics claim put Google's business interests over the sanctity of U.S. intellectual property law.

    After initially asking for licensing terms, Google decided to just take 11,500 lines of code from Oracle to create its mobile phone system. This may seem unfair — and it is — however, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the fair use doctrine of copyright law makes the coding not qualify for copyright protection.

    While a fair use exemption to copyright exists to allow scholars, teachers, reporters, and others to use certain copyrighted material for "limited" and "transformative" purposes, Google's use of this code does not fit either characterization. Google didn't expand the utility of Oracle's coding. The company used it for the explicit functionary purpose that its creator developed it to do, making billions of dollars in the process. That's why the appeals court, Obama and Trump Department of Justices, and congressional copyright leaders have rejected the Ninth Circuit's findings, bringing this copyright case all the way up to the Supreme Court.

    Given these significant and controversial Ninth Circuit decisions that Google has benefitted from in the past, it's fair to wonder just how much of a factor they played in Google's request to move this antitrust proceeding there.

    Legal precedent does not appear to be on Google's side here.

    Last year when the company tried to move a case from the Texas Western District Court to the Northern District of California, the court found that Google did not meet its "heavy burden" to demonstrate that it is "clearly more convenient." The U.S. district court for the Eastern District of Texas should find the same in this antitrust proceeding.

    Even if Google's argument on increased convenience for its witnesses has merit, fairness and justice should always come before expediency. Here's hoping that it does in this case as well.
Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

Romney Says Republicans Shouldn’t Criticize Democrats After Big Spending Under Trump Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics "Biden starts political purge of US military"


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis slammed President Joe Biden for claiming this week that it was “close to sinful” for states to block minors’ access to medical treatments and procedures that can have devastating permanent effects on children.
RALEIGH: Today, Governor Roy Cooper let the following bills become law without his signature:
Actress Tilda Swinton said she’s fed up with COVID protocols on set and won’t abide by them anymore.
A local construction worker was relieved to hear that his money will be used to bail out failing banks used by billionaire elites, despite the fact that he is having a hard time paying his utility bills and putting food on his family's table.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are reportedly investigating the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) after it suffered a fatal run on deposits last week.
Treasurer Folwell and Community Leaders Discuss How Charlotte Patients Face Lawsuits Over Medical Debt, Listen to Community Perspective on Health Care Costs


President Joe Biden issued an executive order Tuesday aimed at keeping firearms out of “dangerous hands” by expanding background checks on gun sales and increasing the use of so-called red flag laws.
There are moments in history when our nation's elected leaders have had to truly prove their worth during trying times. Today, just such a moment occurred, when members of Congress somberly paused sending all of our tax dollars to Ukraine so they could send them to Silicon Valley
The U.S. will sell three to five nuclear-powered submarines to Australia beginning in the early 2030s, President Joe Biden announced on Monday, prompting China to respond with a direct warning to America and its allies.
Administered properly, overseas-study programs can be a boon for UNC-System schools.
Two Russian fighter jets were reportedly harassing a U.S. military drone over international waters on Tuesday morning when one of the fighter jets collided with the drone, forcing the drone to crash into the Black Sea.
In honor of Women's History Month, a woman knelt down in front of a man to demonstrate subservience and submission. Witnesses described the historic event as "weird" and "an unusual way to promote the empowerment of women."


House Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-KY) announced a breakthrough on Tuesday in his investigation into the Biden family’s business dealings.


Back to Top