Targeted Tax Incentives Still Represent Bad Policy | Eastern NC Now

Over the weekend, a reporter asked me to comment on Senate Bill 493.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Over the weekend, a reporter asked me to comment on Senate Bill 493. It's the latest effort to tweak North Carolina's Job Development Investment Grant, the state's primary targeted tax incentive program.

    I'm not sure how much of my response will end up in the final story. You'll see the full response here:

  • It's possible that the people who recruit companies to come to North Carolina would cite Senate Bill 493 as a make-or-break part of the recruitment process. But it's impossible to know whether these extra incentives really make the difference, or if the companies have simply done a good job securing a better deal from N.C. taxpayers for a corporate move that was already going to take place.
  • The bottom line is that targeted tax incentives embodied in the Job Development Investment Grant program represent bad public policy. Period. Lawmakers are much better off pursuing across-the-board tax rate cuts like those promised in Senate Bill 337. If tax reformers believe that bill doesn't do enough, they could cut the corporate income tax rate again. That action would help more businesses now operating in North Carolina — along with those considering moving here — and not just the companies favored by elected officials and government bureaucrats.

    John Hood explained recently why it makes sense for lawmakers to continue focusing on a lower corporate income tax rate.

  • As for reducing the personal income tax by another quarter-point, it represents welcome relief for many households and will boost economic growth a bit. But given the circumstances, I think there's a better lever to push: the corporate income tax.
  • Haven't lawmakers already slashed North Carolina's corporate rate by a lot? Yep. Our state now has the lowest rate of any state that taxes corporate income. That's good news, because when it comes to making states more attractive places to invest and create new jobs, the economic benefit per dollar from corporate-tax cuts is likely higher than from any other kind of tax relief. ...
  • ... Here's my recommendation, then. North Carolina should just phase out its corporate-income tax entirely over the next two years. The fiscal impact (around $900 million) would be less than the proposed cuts in personal income taxes and yet confer broad benefits on employees and consumers.

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Lawmakers Introduce Retail and Online Sports Betting Bill John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Kerry’s Climate Goal Swings Toward the Extreme


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

fortunately this travesty has not yet come to Beaufort County, but it has in Virginia
now Fauci should be indicted for his previous lies under oath to Congress
Queen Garris has made a post on the Beaufort County GOP site that you should read. It is disloyal to conservative candiates key in the following: https://www.Facebook.Com/beaufortcountygop
another reason we need the SAVE America Act that Democrat politicians fear
Throughout the evening, the fireworks and other program events competed with uncooperative weather.

HbAD1

spending spree came from deceptively named "Inflation Reduction Act"
follows up on mass anti-immigration riots in Belfast, Northern Ireland

HbAD2

“Neville Singham has been a mechanism and funding arm of the Chinese Communist Party.”
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
wrongful stops and possible people tacking including cell phones

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top