Justification for Mask Requirements? WCPSS Says It Needs To Follow the Law | Eastern NC Now

Tuesday’s Wake County Board of Education meeting was filled with parents angry about the board’s decision to continue the mask mandate.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Bob Luebke.

    Tuesday's Wake County Board of Education meeting was filled with parents angry about the board's decision to continue the mask mandate. The News and Observer reported that board members said they were legally required to continue the mask requirement.

    My colleague Jon Sanders has written compellingly (see HERE and HERE) about the weak case for requiring masks.

    Parenthetically, we have a real live experiment going on right before our eyes that can help to answer the mask question. Private schools have remained open throughout the state with differing protocols regarding coronavirus protections. If risk levels are as high as stated, wouldn't it seem to reason that absentee and infection rates would be higher at private schools many of which have had less restrictive mask policies or covid protocols than public schools? But that doesn't seem to be the case. Sadly, that evidence doesn't seem to matter to the "science determines our path" crowd.

    But back to the school board meeting.

    After the meeting, WCPSS board Chairman, Keith Sutton said an interview, "As I indicated in several emails to constituents, we took an oath as elected officials to maintain the laws and constitution of the state and the United States. So, I don't plan as Board chair to initiate any action that would be in violation of that law."

    I'm glad Mr. Sutton and the board remember their obligation to maintain the law and uphold the constitution.

    Nevertheless, considering Sutton and the board's embrace of Black Lives Matter and Critical Race Theory, organizations and movements with Marxist origins and which advocate for an end to American culture and government — their sudden commitment to the law appears selective — at best.

    If there is a reason why one shouldn't view Sutton's statement as hallow and disingenuous, I'd like to hear it.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Elections Board Backs Down; Will Not Try To Limit Observers to Two per Day John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Cooper’s Baffling Hypocrisy on Corporate Welfare


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

“I’m from America, 250 years ago we were way bigger than 6/1 dogs, and look at us thriving now.” Justin Gaethje pulls off an all time sports upset.
There are many people who overlook the brilliance of the US Constitution. They argue that it is outdated and unfit to adequately govern such a modern nation as ours in the 21st century.

HbAD1

"I plan to keep his counsel close until our paths cross again," JD Vance said on Thursday.
On Tuesday, Democratic Gov. Josh Stein signed an executive order creating the bipartisan Health Care Affordability Commission that he said will look at ways to make healthcare more affordable for North Carolinians.
"Margo’s Got Money Troubles" explores how financial desperation drives women to OnlyFans. That’s not empowering. It’s exploitative.

HbAD2

“They have never managed anything like this before, and it’s like peanut butter and jelly sandwiches coming out the sides."

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top