Getting the Campaign Against Critical Race Theory Right | Eastern NC Now

Dan McLaughlin of National Review Online highlights words of caution for those working to rid schools of Critical Race Theory.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Dan McLaughlin of National Review Online highlights words of caution for those working to rid schools of Critical Race Theory.

  • Conservatives are on the march in the political offensive against the teaching of Critical Race Theory and related racialist concepts in K-12 public schools, a battle that has moved into state legislatures. I have written about some of the philosophical problems with the "anti-anti-CRT" movement. But it is also the case that the anti-CRT initiatives must navigate a series of political and legal obstacles, and prudent consideration of those is a worthwhile task for those of us who believe in that cause.
  • Greg Lukianoff, CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), has some thoughts worth reading. ... FIRE is, as I have detailed, an essential defender of free speech rights in higher education, without which conservative college and graduate students would be in a much worse situation. As you might expect, Lukianoff is somewhat skeptical of using state laws to limit the teaching of ideas in any school, particularly universities, but he takes a thoughtful approach to the important distinctions: between public and private schools, between universities and K-12 schools, between academic freedom and the power of government to intimidate and indoctrinate students. ...
  • ... [W]hile Lukianoff believes that many anti-CRT laws are constitutional, he warns that poorly-drafted laws can end up banning the teaching of things that the legislators never intended to ban, and can lead to confusion and discord at the school level. But he rejects the view that the laws are reacting to entirely chimerical concerns, citing multiple examples of "legitimately concerning documented cases of K-12 students being singled out due to their race and made to participate in exercises that are, arguably, racially discriminatory," citing the California state curriculum as a particularly noxious example of political and racial indoctrination, and observing that "what opponents of 'CRT' are getting at is a philosophy that comes directly in conflict with small-L liberalism...the rise and widespread adoption of a philosophy that relies on genetic essentialism, overgeneralization, guilt by association...shame and guilt tactics, and deindividuation." This is a worthy thing to oppose, especially if you believe in classically liberal values.

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Certificate of Need: A Bad Law Leads To Bad Behavior John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Texas judge denies US citizen due process rights


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

targets data centers and intermittent electricity sources

HbAD1

5 year sentence for failing to cooperate with surveillance of cit citizens
"He is fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State."
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD2

she was actually 86, and says she did not vote in the 51 elections records show
"We are leveraging counterterrorism tools and global partnerships to deter this threat before it metastasizes," an official shared.
The impressions of our youth are indelibly branded in our hearts and minds. As I think of June 6, 1944 (D Day) it always seems that it was my war. I was nine years old.
Not giving our kids their own devices was one of the best parenting decisions my husband and I made.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top