UNC admissions case marks latest example of growing U.S. Supreme Court trend | Beaufort County Now | When the U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday that it would take up a case challenging UNC-Chapel Hill’s admissions policy, the court made the rare decision to shorten the normal federal appeals process.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    When the U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday that it would take up a case challenging UNC-Chapel Hill's admissions policy, the court made the rare decision to shorten the normal federal appeals process.

    Legal observers note that the justices' decision to examine a trial court ruling, labeled "cert before judgment" in legal shorthand, has become increasingly common in the past three years.

    "Monday's grant was the 14th time the justices have granted cert before judgment since February 2019, after having gone more than 14 years without granting it once," wrote Steve Vladeck, law professor at the University of Texas, at SCOTUSblog.com. "Cert before judgment is on the rise, and it's not at all clear why."

    U.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs ruled last October in favor of UNC-Chapel Hill's admissions policy. Biggs rejected the argument that the university had used race in an unconstitutional way when making admissions decisions.

    Under normal circumstances, the plaintiff, a group called Students for Fair Admissions, would have appealed that ruling to the 4th U.S. Circuit of Appeals. Whoever lost the case in that venue could have asked for a review from the nation's highest court.

    But Students for Fair Admissions filed in November for the U.S. Supreme Court to grant a "writ of certiorari before judgment." That's the official name of "cert before judgment."

    "Since Congress first conferred such authority as part of its far broader expansion of certiorari jurisdiction in the Judiciary Act of 1925, ... the Supreme Court has used its power to grant 'cert before judgment' sparingly," Vladeck wrote. "As the current version of the court's Rule 11 emphasizes, cert before judgment will be granted 'only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court.'"

    In past decades, "cert before judgment" had been used to deal with cases involving Nazi saboteurs, the federal government's wartime seizure of steel mills, Watergate, and the Iranian hostage crisis, Vladeck wrote. "In all of those cases, not only were the questions presented of the utmost importance, but time was of the essence, as well."

    The practice became "all but moribund" in 1988. Between that year and August 2004, justices granted petitions for "cert before judgment" just three times, according to Vladeck. From August 2004 to February 2019, the court did not grant a single petition of that type.

    Now, "whether viewed as a feature or a bug, it can no longer be denied that the current court's unprecedented use of cert before judgment is a fact," Vladeck wrote.

    The 4th Circuit, which handles appeals from federal cases in North Carolina, is one of just three circuits nationwide to generate multiple "cert before judgment" petitions since 2019, Vladeck reports. Justices might be displaying "unspoken hostility" toward certain circuits, he wrote.

    Jon Guze, senior fellow in legal studies at the John Locke Foundation, notes another interesting trend spelled out in Vladeck's work about "cert before judgment" petitions.

    "Fourteen of them occurred after Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh joined the court in 2017 and 2018, and eight occurred after Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined them on the bench in 2020," Guze said. "Some court watchers claim Trump appointees have made the court's conservative wing more assertive and less deferential than it used to be. Maybe the expanded use of cert before judgment has something to do with that."
Go Back


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

At least two people are dead and more than 40 have been injured in a powerful tornado that ripped through northern Michigan Friday night.
A Democratic state representative from Raleigh proposes a statewide ban on transporting dogs in open vehicle beds and cargo areas.
Updating the press on the baby formula shortage that's affecting millions of American families, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre (black, gay, immigrant) stated that all blame for the shortage rested squarely on the curly locks of the giant baby from Honey, I Blew Up The Kid.
Powerful U.S. artillery pieces have started to arrive in Ukraine that offer the country’s military the opportunity to outgun Russia’s military as the new equipment can outreach the capability of Russia’s military by several miles.
As the baby formula crisis continues to grow, more families have opted for an alternative formula source and have started taking whey protein instead. The babies will still get everything they need for healthy development, as well as 50grams of protein per bottle.


A biography of George Floyd will be published on May 17, 2022, and appears to whitewash his life story to highlight his constant “search of a better life” and his “relentless struggle to survive as a Black man in America.”
The first day of class the law professor strode into the room. The first thing he did was ask for the name of a student sitting in the front row.
Republican primary voters picked Trey Allen, Donna Stroud, and Michael Stading to represent the party on the November ballot in three key appellate court races
American voters are increasingly disenchanted with the men and women who have been elected to govern their interests both domestically and abroad.
The House Committee on Ethics said in a statement on Monday that it has opened multiple investigations into outgoing Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R-NC).
RALEIGH: Today, Governor Roy Cooper released a video on critical gun safety reforms to protect our communities.


The U.S. Army, apparently interested in furthering its recent journey into wokeness, is considering a policy called a “compassionate reassignment” permitting soldiers to request a transfer to a different area if they feel state or local laws discriminate against them because of their gender.


Back to Top