Moderna approval another bait and switch | Eastern North Carolina Now

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Monday granted full approval of Moderna’s Spikevax COVID vaccine for people 18 and older.

Similar to the agency’s licensing last year of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, the approval raised a number of legal questions related to mandates and product availability.

Spikevax is a two-dose primary series, approved also for administration as part of a heterologous (“mix and match”) single booster dose for individuals who previously completed their original series of vaccinations with the Pfizer or Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccines.

According to the FDA, Spikevax “has the same formulation as the [Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)] Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine and … can be used interchangeably with the EUA Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series.”

However, in its approval letter, the FDA said Spikevax is “legally distinct” from the Moderna EUA vaccine:

“The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

The FDA made the same distinction between the Pfizer-BioNTech EUA vaccine and the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine, which the agency fully licensed in August, 2021, a move that raised questions about liability and the legality of vaccine mandates.

After Monday’s announcement, media outlets were quick to reassure the public the two Moderna vaccines are the same and that this was just a marketing ploy, where Moderna simply “rebranded” what is otherwise the same vaccine.

No ‘fully licensed’ COVID actually available

While Moderna’s Spikevax vaccine is now fully licensed, the original Moderna vaccine will remain under EUA. Indeed, the FDA on Jan. 7 reissued the EUA.

The FDA has also made it clear the Spikevax vaccine will not be available to the American public, announcing:

“Although SPIKEVAX (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) and Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) are approved to prevent COVID-19 in certain individuals within the scope of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine authorization, there is not sufficient approved vaccine available for distribution to this population in its entirety at the time of reissuance of this EUA.”

These claims parallel the chain of events that followed the FDA’s full approval of the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine in August 2021.

At the time, Pfizer and the FDA claimed Comirnaty was not yet available, as there were sufficient stocks of the Pfizer-BioNTech EUA vaccine still available to be administered.

As of this writing, the FDA states, via its website, that Comirnaty products are “not orderable at this time.”

The FDA has not indicated when, or if, the Spikevax and Comirnaty vaccines will be available for distribution in the U.S.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-full-approval-moderna-spikevax-covid-vaccine/

Even "approved" have not had full testing for long term side effects.  Normally it takes 10 or more years for all the testing to be finished to even be considered for approval.  Something very fishy is going on with these covid injections approvals, IMO.  


Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comment

( February 3rd, 2022 @ 7:34 am )
 
The use of these same Moderna vaccines is banned either for specific parts of the population or all of the population in five Scandanavian countries due to serious side effects involving the heart such as myocarditis. They, to their good fortune do not have a politicized FDA controlled by Big Pharma and Big Government.

When a drug is approved, its contents are supposed to be made public. That did not happen with Pfizer's Covid vaccine and probably does not with Moderna's either.

The big difference between an experimental vaccine and an approved one, is that someone injured by the vaccine can sue the maker if it is approved but cannot if it is experimental. That is the reason that Pfizer and Moderna will only distribute the experimental versions within the US, and the crooked FDA is covering for them.



Is NC on verge of partisan gerrymander from Supreme Court? Rant & Rave, Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics Myocarditis up 75% in Germany, 31% in France since mRNA vaccines given


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

populist right lawmaker not allowed to criticize EU's Green Deal
Biden's illegal rewrite destroys protection of women to pander to transgenders
It should be the People who make the essential decision(s)
Mark 8:15 And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod.
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Majority also believe that prosecution by Bragg is a political witch hunt

HbAD1

Atheist Soros, although born Jewish, was Nazi collaborator in Hungary in WWII
anti-immigration conservative nationalist beats Social Democrat incumbent 2 to 1
Biden wants to push this in public schools and Gov. deSantis says NO
this at the time that pro-Hamas radicals are rioting around the country

HbAD2

 
Back to Top