Is NC on verge of partisan gerrymander from Supreme Court? | Eastern North Carolina Now

The brief filed by NC's far left governor Roy Cooper and even farther left Attorney General Josh Stein with the NC Supreme Court on the redistricting lawsuit is appalling.  They recommend that the slim Democrat majority on the court hijack the process and either draw districts themselves or bring in a Democrat "special master" to do so, instead of the usual process of allowing the legislature to make any changes deemed required.  This sort of partisan power play would be incredibly divisive in our state.

By filing this brief they put the four Democrats on the court on notice of what the party hierarchy, controlled by the governor expected them to do.  If they do not follow this tyrannical governor's diktat, they risk having the party pull support for their reelection. Justice Ervin, who is up for election this year, is particularly in the crosshairs.

At least one Democrat member is probably radical enough to take extreme partisan action on her own, even without the push from Cooper and Stein.  Anita Earls has a radical left political history and is the most extremist person ever elected to the court. But to make matters worse, the politically corrupt Earls is bought and paid for by the Democrat group bringing the lawsuit, which contributed $250,000 to buy Earls her seat on the court.  The fact that she refuses to recuse herself despite this massive conflict of interest means she does not have an honest bone in her body.

If the slim Democrat majority decides to follow Cooper and Stein and abuse its power to do an extreme partisan Democrat power play and gerrymander our state, it is to be hoped that the Republicans on the court will call them out on it.

A bi-partisan 3 judge panel of the Superior Court unanimously approved the districts. The only reason the Democrat majority on the Supreme Court would not confirm that decision would be hardball partisan politics and blatant abuse of power.  Sure the voters could slap them down and vote two Democrats off the court in November, and probably would if the court does a gerrymander, but the damage to our electoral system would be done and the stink around the Supreme Court would take years to go away.


Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




'Someone opened the doors from the inside,' Rant & Rave, Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics Moderna approval another bait and switch


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

this at the time that pro-Hamas radicals are rioting around the country
populist / nationalist anti-immigration AfD most popular party among young voters, CDU second
Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD1

Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.
Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges
prosecutors appeal acquittal of member of parliament in lower court for posting Bible verse
Biden abuses power to turn statute on its head; womens groups to sue
The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.

HbAD2

Democrats prosecuting political opponets just like foreign dictrators do
populist / nationalist / sovereigntist right are kingmakers for new government
18 year old boy who thinks he is girl planned to shoot up elementary school in Maryland
Biden assault on democracy continues to build as he ramps up dictatorship
One would think that the former Attorney General would have known better
UNC board committee votes unanimously to end DEI in UNC system
Police in the nation’s capital are not stopping illegal aliens who are driving around without license plates, according to a new report.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top