Raleigh seeks Appeals Court review of suit challenging water, sewer fees | Eastern NC Now

Raleigh says the General Assembly granted the city permission in 1949 to charge fees linked to extending and enlarging its water and sewer system.

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    Raleigh is asking the N.C. Court of Appeals to take up a case of developers challenging city fees charged for new water and sewer users. Millions of dollars are at stake.

    Lawyers for the capital city filed paperwork Thursday with the state's second-highest court. They're asking that court to review a trial judge's April 12 ruling against Raleigh. The trial judge rejected the city's motion to have the case thrown out.

    "This case ... is a putative class-action in which developers challenged fees that a city charged to new users of its water and sewer services," according to Raleigh's brief. "The two Plaintiffs here are developers who seek to represent a class of hundreds of putative class members who claim that the City of Raleigh lacked statutory authority for those fees."

    "After paying those fees years ago, the Plaintiffs now seek a refund, plus interest," the brief added. "The Plaintiffs' claims, however, are premised on a flawed legal theory: They assert that when Raleigh charged the fees at issue, "Raleigh had no ... charter provision ... to impose [fees] ... for future expansion of its water systems and sewer systems.' As a matter of law, however, that assertion is incorrect."

    Raleigh contends it has had legislative authority since 1949 to "impose 'charges' for the 'extension' and 'enlargement' of its water and sewer system," according to the brief. The capital city urges the Appeals Court to follow the same procedure it has used to hear a similar case from Charlotte.

    The plaintiffs, Wardson Construction and Homequest Builders, challenge fees charged from February 2016 through January 2018. During that time period, the city charged fees based on city ordinances that are no longer in effect. Since July 2018, the city has charged fees based on the General Assembly's 2017 Public Water and Sewer System Development Fee Act.

    "[T]his case is a putative class action challenging fees charged by North Carolina's second largest city," according to Raleigh's brief. "By the Plaintiffs' own allegations, there are 'at least hundreds' of putative class members, ... and the stakes here are exceptionally high. ... [T]he Plaintiffs here have alleged that they are entitled to millions of dollars from the City of Raleigh - indeed, they seek $16 million for 2017 alone."
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




What is Internet stacking? How Musk’s Twitter buy impacts online speech Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Leandro Order Begins to Right the Ship


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics


HbAD1

On Monday, US Rep. Chuck Edwards, R-NC11, was found in violation of the House Code of Official Conduct by the House Ethics Committee, regarding the prohibition of sexual harassment, resulting in calls for him to be censured.
The new program will teach students how to "become an influencer and strategic storyteller who thrives in the rapidly evolving creator economy."
Republicans have consistently backed the blue and new data shows President Trump's strong leadership has led to the fastest decline in violent crime in modern American history.
Sanctuary county for the unborn resolution to be presented by Stan Deatherage at tonight’s (Monday August 3) Beaufort County commissioner meeting.
Biden autopen pardon does not protect him against state prosecution

HbAD2

“Not getting that large sum of money ... was just the final death blow to the company.”

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top