“Zuck Bucks” Bill Would Stop Selective Private Funding of Election Boards | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Dr. Andy Jackson.

    Should private organizations fund election administration?

    Bill Banning Zuck Bucks Passes but Gets Vetoed

    The General Assembly said "no" last year when it passed Senate Bill 725, a bill banning so-called "Zuck bucks." In my testimony in favor of the bill, I noted the evidence of the partisan intent and partisan effect of that funding:

    Partisan intent: Much of the private election funding in the 2020 election came from the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), an advocacy group founded by former employees of the New Organizing Institute, a group that trained digital organizers for Democratic and progressive groups. The Washington Post described the New Organizing Institute as the "Democratic Party's Hogwarts for digital wizardry." CTCL received hundreds of millions of dollars from Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, for the 2020 election.

    Partisan effect: While CTCL gave to both Democratic-leaning and Republican-leaning counties in North Carolina, the 33 counties that CTCL gave funds backed Democrat Cal Cunningham 52.7% to 47.3%, while the other 67 counties, which were not provided funds, supported Republican Thom Tillis 53.6% to 46.4%. Regardless of whether the partisan bias in CTCL funding during the 2020 election in North Carolina was intentional, it existed.


    Given the partisan effects of that private election funding, Gov. Roy Cooper naturally vetoed the bill.

    Seeking a Compromise on Zuck Bucks

    Since then there have been a couple of attempts at compromise legislation that would allow private donors to provide money for election administration but deny them control over which county election boards receive the money.

    The first compromise bill was offered by Sen. Don Davis (D-Greene, Pitt) last year. That bill would have created an "emergency election fund" that private funders could put in money. The bill would have also created a "North Carolina Emergency Election Authority," a board tasked with voting on how to distribute funds.

    That bill had several problems. The board would have been dominated by appointees from the governor and would have had total discretion on how funds were distributed. It would have replaced discretionary election administration funding by private donors with discretionary election administration funding by a partisan board.

    The bill never made it out of committee.

    A new compromise bill was introduced to the General Assembly this week. House Bill 1160 is sponsored by representatives George G. Cleveland (R-Onslow), Steve Tyson (R-Craven), Mike Clampitt (R-Haywood, Jackson, Swain), and Jeffrey C. McNeely (R-Iredell).

    If Davis' bill was marred by its complexity and partisan discretion, another Zuck bucks compromise bill is noteworthy for its simplicity and nondiscretionary funding formula. The one-page bill has three components:

  • Only the State Board of Elections (SBE) may accept private election administration donations.
  • At the start of each fiscal year, the SBE shall evenly distribute those donations to each of the 100 county election boards.
  • The county boards shall spend the funds on "upgrading voting systems and equipment"

    Nondiscretionary Funding a "Poison Pill?"

    The bill is sound but could be improved. It makes little sense for large counties like Cumberland (206,521 registered voters) to receive the same funding as small counties like Dare (31,318 registered voters). Some formula that includes baseline per-county funding with an element of funding based on population would be more adequate.

    However, the bigger obstacle to getting this bill passed and signed by Gov. Cooper may be the removal of discretionary private funding. Discretionary private election administration funding benefited Democrats in 2020 and any attempt to more fairly distribute those funds will be likely resisted by Gov. Cooper and his allies.

    Likewise, leftist groups would balk at providing private election administration funding without any control over where those funds go. Despite any claims that private election administration funding is about closing a gap created by a lack of government spending on elections, control of the money is their real concern.

    House Bill 1160 is the start of a solid election administration funding reform bill, but it is unlikely to become law this year.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Survey Refutes Media and Teacher Union Spin John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Self-Identified “Compelling Interests” are Not a License to Discriminate


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

far left sugar daddy has also funded anti-Israel groups and politicians in US
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it
America needs to wake up and get its priorities right
Former President Donald Trump suggested this week that if he becomes president again, he might allow Prince Harry to be deported.
It's a New Year, which means it's time to make resolutions — even for prominent evangelical leaders. The Babylon Bee asked the following well-known figures in the faith what they hope to accomplish in 2024:
Vice President Kamala Harris will visit a Minnesota Planned Parenthood clinic, reportedly the first time a president or vice president has visited an abortion facility.

HbAD1

An eight-mile stretch of the Blue Ridge Parkway near Asheville has been temporarily closed due to a string of “human and bear interactions,” the National Parks Service announced.
University of Wisconsin tried to punish conservatives for the fact that liberals regularly commit crimes to silence opposition
most voters think EU officials not doing a good job on illegal immigration
Come from behind by GOP candidate is a blueprint to 2024
Biden spending and energy policies to blame

HbAD2

Tuberculosis carried by illegal invaders has already infected Texas cattle

HbAD3

 
Back to Top