Elections Matter | Eastern North Carolina Now | There’s not much middle ground regarding the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision. I’ve listened to some praising our Justices as well as others, usually louder, vilifying them.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Tom Campbell

    There's not much middle ground regarding the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision. I've listened to some praising our Justices as well as others, usually louder, vilifying them. But after the rhetoric wanes a bit there's one common ground on which most all can agree: elections matter.

    As often as not the focus turns to the US Supreme Court and the power of a president to nominate potential justices. Donald Trump appointed three, enough to determine the outcome of the latest abortion decision.

    Abortion will be on the ballot in North Carolina's US Senate contest between former Republican Congressman Ted Budd and former Democratic Supreme Court Chief Justice Cheri Beasley. Hoping to parlay current strong emotions against the decision into votes, Beasley proclaims that if elected she will join efforts to pass legislation allowing nationwide abortion. Budd is toeing the conservative Republican line in celebrating the court decision. This race is tight. Recent polling has Budd with a narrow four-point lead. The question becomes who can energize the voters to turn out. November is many months away and emotions may wane. While important, the major issue in this race is control of the Senate. Democrats now hold a razor thin plurality in the US Senate and our contest could be the swing vote. It's already an expensive and nasty fight.

    It is unknown how the recent court decision might impact all 14 congressional races in our state. Democrats will try to arouse the abortion sentiment but the economy will be a major focus by Republican candidates. Again, North Carolina's congressional races could be pivotal in determining which party controls the US House.

    We also cannot predict whether the Roe decision will have an impact on critical appellate court elections in our state. Two Democratic justices on our Supreme Court have terms expiring this year. Robin Hudson chose not to run for another term because she is nearing the mandatory retirement age. Democrat Lucy Inman and Republican Richard Dietz, both judges on the Court of Appeals, will be vying for Hudson's seat. Incumbent justice Sam Ervin, IV, will be facing Republican Trey Allen for the other seat. Democrats now hold slim 4-3 plurality on the high court. A single Republican win could result in a tie vote on crucial verdicts and if Democrats lose both seats, partisan control of the court swings Republican. There was a time when party affiliation wasn't so important in verdict outcomes, but that time has passed.

    Four of our 15 Court of Appeals seats are up for grabs. Lower court rulings are appealed to this level, with three judge panels assigned to consider each case. Partisan rulings on this court are not usually as noticeable, but party affiliations in the makeup of those panels sometimes determines who wins or loses. If Democrats have a strong year it could lessen the current Republican 10-5 plurality.

    I cannot pass up the opportunity to once again proclaim that the election of North Carolina appellate court judges is archaic, promotes partisan divisions and does not serve justice. As things now stand voters readily admit they don't know the qualifications or records of those on the ballot; their primary determinant appears to be party affiliation. How does this serve justice? It doesn't. Justice isn't blind, no matter how much we want to believe it to be.

    Lower down the ballot, but equally important, is the election of all 170 members of our General Assembly. It matters which party has more numbers because that party selects leadership. More importantly, the margin of that plurality is important. North Carolina currently has a governor of one party and the majority of both our House and Senate of another party. In mid-term elections the party of the sitting president usually loses many seats.

    Consider the consequences regarding abortion. North Carolina still allows abortions to take place, but Republican leadership is already indicating that if they retain control of the legislature next year, they intend to revisit those laws. You have to know that Governor Roy Cooper will veto any serious changes, so the numbers of that plurality become the real determinant. If Republicans have veto-proof or three-fifths majorities, they can override his veto. If not, his decision will be sustained. Cooper has issued more vetoes than any previous governor and since 2018, the last mid-term wave election, all have been upheld

    Who will have the passion? Who will raise the most money and get out the vote? As we said at the beginning of this piece, elections matter... and never more so than this year.

    The decisions are in our hands.

      Tom Campbell is a Hall of Fame North Carolina Broadcaster and columnist who has covered North Carolina public policy issues since 1965. He recently retired from writing, producing and moderating the statewide half-hour TV program NC SPIN that aired 22 1/2 years. Contact him at tomcamp@carolinabroadcasting.com.

With Roe v Wade (originated in 1973) overturned by the US Supreme Court, thereby allowing decisions on abortion legislation completely returned to the states: Where do you find your position on such a "Life and Death" issue for the American People?
  Yes, I approve of the US Supreme Court's decision to reinstate this "medical" issue back to the states' legislative responsibility to regulate.
  No, I believe that every woman should have complete access to abortion on demand.
  This issue is far beyond my intellectual capacity to understand.
230 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

With respect to the leaked opinion not yet written for ratification regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's revisiting the original decision of Roe v Wade, whence now nonstop protests have erupted in neighborhoods where U.S. Supreme Court justices live, exhibiting the firm intent to intimidate these officers of the highest court in the land: What action should the federal authorities take?
  Do nothing ... Protests are a fixture of a free society.
  Enforce the law ... Federal codes exist to prohibit any intimidation through the pubic harassment of federal judges, especially Supreme Court justices.
  I have no idea, however, northern Virginia School Board Members must be shielded from protests at all costs.
323 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


( July 7th, 2022 @ 4:47 am )
Mr. Campbell, could you please tell me where abortion is a power delegated to the United States by the Constitution?
( July 6th, 2022 @ 8:32 pm )
If a site HAS to have a token leftie, it is good to have one as absolutely clueless as Tom Campbell. All the polls show that the Supreme Court ruling giving states control of abortion laws will have NO impact either way in the election. But Campbell blithers on based totally on ideology, not reality.
( July 6th, 2022 @ 3:00 pm )
On constitutional issue where life or death are held in the balance; yes, your are right Tom, "there is no gray area."

Tenure’s False Promise My Spin, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Dems unveil "transgender bill of rights" while economy collapses


Back to Top