Leftist Whoopi Goldberg Suggests God Supports Killing Unborn Babies | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Ryan Saavedra.

    Whoopi Goldberg, a leftist co-host of ABC's "The View," argued on the show this week that God supports killing unborn babies via abortion.

    Goldberg, who previously was suspended by the network for making an anti-Semitic remark about the Holocaust, argued Wednesday that abortion was okay because God gives people the "freedom of choice."

    "And as you know, God doesn't make mistakes. God made us smart enough to know when it wasn't going to work for us," Goldberg said. "That's the, that's the beauty of giving us freedom of choice."

    Pro-life guest and former "The View" co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck pushed back on Goldberg's remarks, repeatedly saying, "No."

    "Yes, because I know my relationship. You know, my relationship is always choppy. It's always choppy with God, always, because I have a lot of questions," Goldberg said. "But I also know that God made me smart enough to know that if there are alternatives out there that can work for me, I will investigate them. But I also know God said, 'Do unto others, as you would have them do unto you, I will not make that decision for anybody.'"

    "What about the life in the womb?" Hasselbeck asked. "You know, I will say this, that life has a plan and a purpose designed by God, I don't believe there are any circumstances where we should give [inaudible]."

    "I love that you feel that way. It's great," Goldberg responded. "Listen, I don't ever think that I can make any decision for you and your family that you are not smart enough to make for yourself. And God knows my heart. And God knows most everybody's heart. And again, before we go, let me just point out, no one, no one at this table is not pro-life. Nobody at this table is not pro-life. I just want to make sure we all know that. Nobody is happy about going to get an abortion. It's not fun."

    "That's not pro-life," Hasselbeck responded. "It's a hard, hard decision. Life has a plan and a purpose and there are agencies out there that will help you keep that baby alive."

    "The View" was forced to apologize last week to Turning Point USA (TPUSA) after falsely claiming that neo-Nazis had been allowed into the previous weekend's Student Action Summit hosted by the organization.

    Last week, as the hosts wrapped up the first segment of Wednesday's broadcast, Goldberg brought the conversation to a halt so that co-host Sara Haines could read a legal note ahead of the commercial break.

    "On Monday we talked about the fact there were openly neo-Nazi demonstrators outside the Florida Student Action Summit of the Turning Point USA group," Haines read. "We want to make clear these demonstrators were gathered outside the event and that they were not invited or endorsed by Turning Point USA."

    "A Turning Point USA spokesman said the group 100% condemns those ideologies and said Turning Point USA security tried to remove the neo-Nazis from the area, but could not because they were on public property. Also Turning Point USA wanted to clarify - wanted us to clarify this was a Turning Point USA summit and not a Republican Party event. So we apologize for anything we said that may have been unclear on these points."

    Virginia Kruta contributed to this report.

poll#152
With Roe v Wade (originated in 1973) overturned by the US Supreme Court, thereby allowing decisions on abortion legislation completely returned to the states: Where do you find your position on such a "Life and Death" issue for the American People?
  Yes, I approve of the US Supreme Court's decision to reinstate this "medical" issue back to the states' legislative responsibility to regulate.
  No, I believe that every woman should have complete access to abortion on demand.
  This issue is far beyond my intellectual capacity to understand.
583 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#150
With respect to the leaked opinion not yet written for ratification regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's revisiting the original decision of Roe v Wade, whence now nonstop protests have erupted in neighborhoods where U.S. Supreme Court justices live, exhibiting the firm intent to intimidate these officers of the highest court in the land: What action should the federal authorities take?
  Do nothing ... Protests are a fixture of a free society.
  Enforce the law ... Federal codes exist to prohibit any intimidation through the pubic harassment of federal judges, especially Supreme Court justices.
  I have no idea, however, northern Virginia School Board Members must be shielded from protests at all costs.
548 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

One would think that the former Attorney General would have known better
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
UNC board committee votes unanimously to end DEI in UNC system
Police in the nation’s capital are not stopping illegal aliens who are driving around without license plates, according to a new report.

HbAD1

Davidaon County student suspended for using correct legal term for those in country illegally
Lawmakers and privacy experts on both sides of the political spectrum are sounding the alarm on a provision in a spy powers reform bill that one senator described as one of the “most terrifying expansions of government surveillance” in history
given to illegals in Mexico before they even get to US: NGOs connected to Mayorkas
committee gets enough valid signatures to force vote on removing Oakland, CA's Soros DA
other pro-terrorist protests in Chicago shout "Death to America" in Farsi

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top