PEPSC “Framework” Comes With Yet More Problems | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Dr. Robert Luebke.

    Last week, the State Board of Education approved a resolution to move ahead with a framework to create a new way to license and pay teachers. Currently teachers are paid based on their years of experience. The new system proposes to tie salary to levels of licensure. It also provides teachers with other pathways to earn additional dollars such as supervising or assisting with extracurricular activities or mentoring younger teachers.

    The framework is part of the work of the Professional Educators Preparation and Standards Commission (PEPSC). PEPSC was created to make recommendations to the State Board of Education (SBE) regarding all aspects of teacher preparation, licensure, and professional standards. PEPSC began meeting in 2017. The work of the Commission is supported by Superintendent Catherine Truitt and business groups. Why did SBE vote to only adopt a framework? Officials learned that for the state to move forward with large changes regarding licensure and teacher pay, other regulations and statutes will need to be changed.

    Is the PEPSC framework a good one? First, let's acknowledge North Carolina needs new ways to pay teachers and license teachers. These have been problems for years and have only been exacerbated by changes in the last few years. I'm encouraged these difficulties are getting the attention they deserve, but big issues remain.

    It seems that the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction got a little over its skis when it formed a commission to overhaul teacher pay and licensure. Government lawyers soon found out the PEPSC Commission lacked the authority to do so.

    PEPSC wants to offer new paths for teacher licensure. That's fine and good. Current licensure efforts, however, do nothing to address one of the biggest licensure problems: licensure backlogs at the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. Will a plan to overhaul the whole process merely overwhelm an inadequate system?

    Support for the PEPSC proposal and framework remains spotty. State Superintendent Catherine Truitt, Best NC and a variety of business interests support these efforts. Other teacher professional organizations like the North Carolina Association of Educators (NCAE) have been vocal in their opposition. NCAE claims the pay plan to replace the current salary schedule amounts to merit pay, a policy the organization strongly opposes.

    There are compelling reasons to move away from a pay system based largely on years of experience. l) to a plan based on teacher quality and teacher effectiveness. Many teachers favor such proposals. They just don't seem to be in North Carolina. The lack of support from teachers is troubling.

    One reason for the lack of support from teachers may be because the formal process for how to evaluate teachers has not been finalized. The new model will likely have principal and peer evaluations, some component of student assessment along with a measure of student growth. Currently, part of a teachers' evaluation involves using the EVAAS System (Education Value Added Assessment System). EVAAS attempts to quantify a teacher's contribution to student learning. The EVAAS system however has been criticized for lack of transparency and because not all teachers have classes that EVAAS can use to help generate scores.

    PEPSC is established in part to move away from a system that pays teachers based largely on experience. A in a new system teacher pay will be a function of licensure level and involvement in other pathways while total pay may be based on licensure and pathways base salary in the new plan is still largely determined by years of experience.

    One final objection to the PEPSC framework is that the plan lacks any reference to cost. This is not a small consideration. Last year, North Carolina spent over $10 billion on public education. Most of these funds were for employee salaries and benefits. The PEPSC plan overhauls licensure and teacher pay. As such, it would have a significant impact on education costs, yet no estimates are provided.

    The PEPSC framework has value. It correctly diagnoses. an important problem but comes with significant shortcomings. The desire to pilot test final licensure and pay proposals will slow walk these proposals. Considering the many problems which need attention, that may be one of the plan's best provisions.
Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

NC House Committee passes recommendations to improve K-12 education Educational Realities, Educating our People, John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Native Front, Op-Ed & Politics What WRAL Gets Wrong About North Carolina’s Congressional Districts


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

New business creation filings grew 40% in 2021 over 2020, for a total of 178,300 new businesses in the state.
The Penn Biden Center, a Washington think tank where classified documents were found in November, hosted an event encouraging deeper U.S.-China ties.
shift of ten percentage points from traditional conservatives in Lower Austria
University of Richmond changes name of law school, family demands $51 million back


A federal agency under the Biden Administration walked back comments it made earlier in the week that it was considering a ban on gas stoves in new construction or as a replacement product, citing concerns that the appliances may cause a rise in respiratory illnesses.
On Monday, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced that a North Korea-associated hacking group had carried out a robbery of $100 million in cryptocurrency last year.
Theologians at the Claremont School of Theology put forward additional evidence that God has a sense of humor by pointing out that 1 out of every 20 pistachios tastes like flaming hot garbage.
Indiana taxpayers shelled out more than $100,000 to 1619 Project author Nikole Hannah-Jones for just over 24 hours of work, according to a contract obtained by The Daily Wire under public records laws.
There are several problems with ballot marking devices such as the one Buncombe County is considering.
Rep. George Santos (R-NY) is a world-class liar. He has told baldfaced lies about nearly everything — from being Jewish to (for some reason) leading the Baruch College volleyball team to wins over Harvard and Yale.


We all want what's best for our children. That's why it's important to educate them early on how to deny gender normativity and embrace dysphoria. What will people think if your child becomes a "normie?" That would be the worst!


Back to Top