Buckle Up, All Ye Unvaccinated! | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of The James G. Martin Center. The author of this post is Harrington Shaw.

    Scholarly research is intended to provide us with the tools to solve humanity's most complex and challenging problems. The findings of academic studies provide the basis for school curricula, inform crucial medical decisions, and guide public-policy formation. We entrust the institutions of academic research with great discretionary power over the direction of our society's knowledge base. Unfortunately, it seems that many of these institutions have positively lost their minds.

    Recent publishings call into question the credibility of some of the most prominent scholarly journals. Consider, for example, a recent study in The American Journal of Medicine entitled "Covid Vaccine Hesitancy and Risk of a Traffic Crash."

    The study begins with the specious and pejorative hypothesis that "individual adults who tend to resist public health recommendations might also neglect basic road safety guidelines." Based on recently collected data, the authors conclude that vaccine hesitancy is associated with an increased risk of having a traffic accident.

    While the study does not explicitly declare a causal relationship between vaccination status and the risk of an accident, one sentence in its conclusion implies just that. The authors state that "an awareness of these [traffic accident] risks might help to encourage more Covid vaccination."

    If the relationship between vaccination and traffic accidents is merely associative, then there is no reason that bringing it to people's attention should alter their behavior. Either the authors are suggesting that physicians and media outlets manipulate people into getting vaccinated by asserting a false causal relationship or the authors believe that Covid vaccines somehow upload superior driving abilities to the minds of patients (see The Matrix, 1999).

    The more closely one examines the study, the more its findings unravel. Consider the factor of age, for example. Since Covid impacts older folks much more severely than it does younger adults, one could reasonably conclude that an older person's decision not to get vaccinated shows a much greater disregard for public health guidelines. As such, the researchers' findings should indicate that older folks who refused the vaccine are the most "reckless" and therefore the most likely to cause traffic accidents.

    The data, however, show the exact opposite. Adults over 65 had a greater risk of traffic accidents with the vaccine than without. How this obvious contradiction didn't discredit the entire premise of the study is utterly confounding.

    The authors go on to make a number of imbecilic recommendations, including the proposal that first responders should take extra Covid precautions at traffic accidents, since the victims are likely to be unvaccinated. In reality, such victims are most likely just young, inexperienced drivers.

    Considering the fact that the American Journal of Medicine is one of the primary journals distributed among physicians, it is of great concern that such absurdities are allowed to be published. Luckily, the aforementioned Covid study received significant media pushback. Yet the pages of our most prominent journals are replete with similarly foolish research.

    For example, National Review Online recently exposed a glaring conflict of interest in a UCLA study on the working conditions of fast-food employees, which was used to support public-policy objectives including increases in the minimum wage. It turned out that the researchers had "outsourced the labor of recruiting and surveying fast-food workers to SEIU," a labor union with a vested interest in minimum-wage hikes.

    Similarly, ReasonTV has reported on a group of university faculty who intentionally submitted ridiculous "studies" to prominent journals to test their academic scrutiny. Seven of their hoax papers were published, including a piece on intersectional feminism that was, in reality, a rearrangement of a section of Mein Kampf.

    If scholars and researchers are to supply our students, educators, and experts in the field with trustworthy and insightful studies, we must reverse this decline in the quality of scholarship. Publications with a history of accepting politically corrupt, academically dishonest, and utterly false or ridiculous work should be publicly disavowed by institutions of higher education. Neither students' tuition nor taxpayers' dollars should be appropriated to support unscrupulous academic journals. Instead, we should turn to the market to select winners and leave the remainder to the dustbin of academic ineptitude.

    Harrington Shaw is an intern at the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal and a junior studying economics and philosophy at UNC-Chapel Hill.
Go Back


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The Chicago Blackhawks will not take the ice for Sunday’s warm-ups wearing pride-themed jerseys, team sources told The Athletic.
In what has been hailed as a landmark day for Bible history buffs, archeologists have announced the discovery of the steel cage where Jacob wrestled with God, as chronicled in the book of Genesis.
Here we see the seeds of disunity in the local GOP and why it is there
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told members of the Senate Finance Committee on Thursday morning that the American financial system “remains sound” despite two recent bank failures.
A second-year law student at the University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill School of Law was arrested Sunday and charged with domestic terrorism in a coordinated crowd attack on the police training center in Atlanta.
A resident doctor who was training in family medicine not only had an alleged huge cache of child porn, but he also allegedly recorded children as young as 6 years old using a camera hidden in a bracelet as he examined them.


Patrick, the patron saint of Ireland, expressed great pride that he was able to bring Christianity to the Anglo-Saxons so their descendants could commemorate it each year
A lead Republican investigator now claims several members of the Biden family are involved in shady business ventures abroad, sharing in the past 24 hours a larger headcount than previously known.
The State has a right and duty to protect young children from these abominations
If Donald Trump were to be indicted for having a tawdry tryst with a trollop, he should probably plead guilty post haste. But the case brought against him by the Manhattan district attorney’s office is not about whether or not he cheated on his wife with porn actress Stormy Daniels
Local leprechaun, pot o' gold enthusiast, and all-around jokester Leery O'Canahan had been excited for St. Patrick's Day for months. "It's like our Super Bowl," O'Canahan told reporters. "Without the weird halftime shows."


also provides for reporting any attempt to "transition" a child


Back to Top