Testimony for Removing the Literacy Test from North Carolina’s Constitution | Eastern NC Now

I spoke in favor of House Bill 44, removing the literacy test from the North Carolina Constitution at a meeting of the House Judiciary Committee on the morning of March 1. My prepared comments are below:

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Dr. Andy Jackson.

    I spoke in favor of House Bill 44, removing the literacy test from the North Carolina Constitution at a meeting of the House Judiciary Committee on the morning of March 1. My prepared comments are below:

  • I am Andy Jackson with the John Locke Foundation.
  • I speak in favor of House Bill 44, the constitutional amendment to repeal the literacy test.
  • No one here needs a history lesson on how the literacy test, combined with the grandfather clause, stripped voting rights from Black North Carolinians. I applaud the current General Assembly for rising to remove it.
  • But I've also come to offer a warning.
  • While repealing the literacy test is supported on both sides of the aisle here, there is no guarantee that it will pass a vote of the people. In fact, the last time the General Assembly put repealing the literacy test up for a vote in 1970, the people rejected it.
  • This is not 1970 and repeal has a better chance of passing in a vote next year. Still, a May 2022 poll found that 55% of respondents favored repealing the literacy test while the rest either opposed or were unsure. That is an uncomfortably close margin.
  • Some voters may read or hear about the seemingly innocuous language of the literacy test and believe, as the United State Supreme Court ruled in Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections (1959) that "The North Carolina requirement ... does not, on its face," violate the United States Constitution.
  • In short, repealing the literacy test is no slam dunk.
  • First, while legislators should avoid editorializing in the text of constitutional amendments, adding language noting the literacy test has been prohibited by the federal Voting Rights Act since 1965 gives voters important context. The [committee substitution] change in the amendment's language helps.
  • Second, and this applies to my colleagues in the nonprofit community as well as legislators, we must not succumb to the temptation to use the literacy test as a political bludgeon against our opponents. Each time we do so, we run the risk of driving down support for repeal.
  • Thank you.


    I had prepared a two-minute comment, but the committee only allowed one minute for speaking. Here is a video of my shorter actual comment to the committee.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




The Market Is Responding to Right-to-Repair Needs Without Legislation John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics “Forbidden-Word” Lists Are a Symptom of Administrative Bloat


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics


HbAD1

"Your faith will go quiet when you need it loud. Tend to your faith, not just when you’re broken, but when you’re whole."
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
A new poll data points to continuing trend among the next generation of the left.
Libertarian rabble rouser Massie defeated in Kentucky

HbAD2

Trump administration policies are bringing the country back from the brink of an uncontrolled influx of illegal immigrants.
Sen. Tillis Urges Senate to Cancel ICE, Border Patrol Vote to Boost Cornyn’s Reelection Bid

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top