NC General Statutes ignored by NC DPI, Beaufort County Commissioners, and Beaufort County School Board? | Eastern North Carolina Now

Just who is responsible for legal compliance with State Laws?

ENCNow

By:  Ray Leary

The Citizens for Better Government of Beaufort County made two public records requests, one in August and another in September 2024, both to the NC Department of Public Instruction.

One was for the evaluation document on the reasonableness of the new school to be constructed in Washington, NC. A reasonableness assessment is to be performed prior to the issuance of NC Lottery Grants for public schools in North Carolina. This evaluation is required by NC general statute 115C-546.11 (d).

§ 115C 546.11 (d) The Department of Public Instruction shall review projected enrollment to evaluate the reasonableness of a project's size and scope.

In an email from Holly West-Pauley, Public Information Specialist, Office of Communications and Information Services, NC Department of Public Instruction, I received several files related to the grant, however there was no document that revealed the existence of the reasonableness study prior to the issuance of the $42 million grant to Beaufort County. Please note that this is a matching grant requiring $10 million match from Beaufort County. This was agreed on by a majority of the Beaufort County Commissioners. The local funds were allocated from the general fund balance.

Thus, the first question becomes:  Is this proposed new school legal?

The next request was to ask for confirmation of the receipt of the performance evaluation of the Beaufort County NC school superintendent. This evaluation is required by NCGS 115C-333(f)2. The statute reads as follows.

115C-333 (f)2

Local Board Evaluation of Certain Superintendents. - Each year the local board of education shall evaluate the superintendent employed by the local school administrative unit and report to the State Board the results of that evaluation if during that year the State Board designated as low-performing:

(2) Two or more schools in a local school administrative unit that has no more than 20 schools.

Beaufort County schools had eight of 14 schools designated as low performing for the 22-23 school year. By statute, these performance scores should have triggered a performance review of the superintendent by the school board. The performance review was to be sent to the NC DPI. The request to DPI was for confirmation of the receipt of the performance assessment, not the assessment document.

Blair Rhoades, Communications Director, Office of Communications and Information Services, Division of Chief of Staff, NC DPI responded October 14, 2024. The response is as follows.

Hi Ray,

Thank you for reaching out.

Unfortunately, neither the State Board of Education nor DPI are in possession of a document that is responsive to your request below. I apologize that I cannot be of more help.

Thank you,

Blair Rhoades

Two Beaufort County schools are to be consolidated with the new K-3 school; Eastern Elementary and John Cotton Tayloe. The current occupancy of these schools is 67% and 77% respectively according to the table in a report entitled 2022-23 Beaufort County Schools Membership Forecast. Michael Miller, Numerix, LLC performed this analysis.

Furthermore, the forecast for both schools in 2032 indicates both schools at less than 90% occupancy. The projection for 2032 for the new K-3 school is projected to have an occupancy rate of 96% when the combined forecast for both schools is included.

If these data are correct, it means that the proposed new school will be overbuilt for the projected occupancy rate for the next 4 years. For the years 2029-2032, the school will be virtually at capacity. The trends in the forecast indicates that after 2032, the school will be at maximum occupancy or overcrowded. Due to the site limitations, expansion will be difficult, if not impossible.

There is no mention of NC DPI commissioning this report and no indication of anything in this report related to the suitability or reasonableness of the new school size, attendance grade selection, traffic issues, bussing patterns within the county, or site selection as required by the general statutes to receive this grant.

Where is the accountability for these entities ignoring the laws of North Carolina?

At the start of the September regular school board meeting, superintendent Dr. Matthew Cheeseman played a video from WNCT-TV on September 12, 2024. This video was an interview by a reporter from WNCT wherein Dr. Cheeseman announced that Beaufort County schools was no longer designated as a low performing school district. The improvements noted by Dr. Cheeseman were mostly in growth scores, while six schools continue with student proficiency scores with a ‘D’ rating. A ‘D’ score is represented numerically as 40-54.

https://www.wnct.com/video/beaufort-county-schools-celebrating-student-performance-achievements/10037960/


Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )



Comments

( March 18th, 2025 @ 12:07 am )
 
With the Beaufort County revaluation a major topic everywhere I go here in Beaufort County, and I am ever at the ready to discuss the revaluation and other county issues relative to my functionary duties as a county commissioner at any time, I can definitively tell the public of this public square this one truth: The new unneeded school using mostly "Free Money" NOW in these costly days of building, which could have been available later for more worthy, more cost effective and necessary projects, coupled with the half million dollars to save the project because the administration of Beaufort County chose not plan properly, is NOT going over well with the public at large across this county of Beaufort.

As public officials wasting tax dollars is being found out, maybe the taxpayers one day, at large, will have the gumption to make the time to know what is truly occurring in their local governments, know the poor players working on their behalf, and, accordingly, the political interlopers who do NOT function as governing officials as they held themselves out to be ... And then maybe, just maybe, the self-governed folks of Beaufort County will provide me smarter county commissioners to serve with, and a real governing school board of knowledge, who, like the smarter county commissioners, can then hire better bureaucrats who know their place, and they know too who they ultimately serve - the self governed taxpayers of this county.
Van Zant said:
( March 17th, 2025 @ 8:56 pm )
 
I do not think that this superintendent cares at all about the statutes or the board policies. As long as he has five board votes he believes he doesn't have to and can actually interpret as he pleases. Last year three board members tried to implement a superintendent evaluation. It is my understanding that they accomplished a partial evaluation after resistance from the superintendent and obscuration by the board majority.

As best as I can tell it is only in recent years that some of these things have come to light. This board operated for so long out of sight with long serving board members coasting along in their own world. I can't find anyone that even remembers ANY evaluation being done. The attempt last year just might be the only attempt in history.
( March 17th, 2025 @ 8:19 pm )
 
It's that time of year again. The Superintendent should receive a performance review from the school board and it should be sent on to NC DPI as required by state statute. It will be interesting to see if the weak school board grows a spine this year and actually does its job. Cheeseman would be right to worry given his abysmal job performance but it is highly doubtful the board will give him a poor review, if indeed, they give him one at all. Special attention should be paid to how the new, supposedly "conservative" school board members, Daniel Hudson and Stacey Davis approach the issue.
( November 30th, 2024 @ 8:59 pm )
 
The reality is that the self-serving education establishment protects its own, and they don't give a tinker's damn about the citizens and taxpayers. DPI, the teachers unions, and the self-serving local superintendants all scratch each others' backs and ignore whatever pesky laws get in their way.

The only way to fix the problem is with a lawsuit, but that is expensive. The only practical way to do that is to find a government accountablity NGO that will fund it.
Then you can throw a monkey wrench into the gears of the education establishment. I wish that were done more often because this bunch is as corrupt as the day is long.

The other way is to get an honest local school board that will not let itself be controlled by its superintendant, but too often, the tail wags the dog in that relationship.
( November 30th, 2024 @ 1:16 pm )
 
Referencing Leary's post. I am seriously asking:

How are the citizens suppose to get the protections it was promised by an agency when that agency is not enforcing th safeguards it created?
Where does a citizen go for accountability when th Depts wont enforce their own rules?

Leary wrote: A performance review of th superintendent by th school board is required under certain conditions. The performance review was 2b sent to th NC DPI. The response from Blair Rhoades, Communications Director, was none received.
==
Does anyone have an answer as to what a citizen is supposed to do abt it?
( November 29th, 2024 @ 9:40 am )
 
In any competently run organization, employees should have performance reviews and the fact that our rubber stamp school board does not give them to their employee the superintendant speaks volumes. Eltha Booth and T.W. Allen in particular are little more than seat warmers, really pathetic. Carolyn Walker and Terry Williams talk a good game and at least pay attention, but in the final analysis, they are in Cheeseman's hip pocket, too. The problem with our school system is that we have the tail (the superintendant) wagging the dog (the school board). That needs to end, and now that Cheeseman's yes-people are a minority, hopefully it will.
( November 28th, 2024 @ 9:12 pm )
 
Ray Leary wrote:
A performance review of the superintendent by the school board is required under certain conditions. The performance review was to be sent to the NC DPI. The request to DPI was for confirmation of the receipt of the performance assessment. The response from Blair Rhoades, Communications Director, was none received.

OK so there is a rule/law/reg within this dept that this be done. Yet its not done and Rhoades seems to blow it off. I'm asking where does a citizen go for accountability when the Depts wont enforce their own rules?

I find this lack of accountability within a Dept, is EVERYWHERE!
Does anyone have an answer as to what a citizen is supposed to do abt it?
( November 25th, 2024 @ 7:50 pm )
 
2x = (36-x)

3x = 36

X=12
View All Comments



2 School Board incumbents duck and cover on Dem activist school bd. attorney Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics Sex education at the Beaufort County Community College


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

would allow civil lawsuit against judge if released criminal causes harm
"This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter narco-terror operations."
Charlie Kirk, 31 years of age, who was renowned as one of the most important and influential college speakers /Leaders in many decades; founder of Turning Point USA, has been shot dead at Utah Valley University.
The Trump administration took actions against Harvard related to the anti-Israel protests that roiled its campus.

HbAD1

In remembrance of the day that will forever seer the concept of 'evil' in our minds, let's look back at that fateful morning, exactly 11 years ago today to that series of horrific events which unfolded before our unbelieving eyes......

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top