By Aron Solomon (see below for credentials)
Violence is never justified. This unassailable truth must guide our response to this week's tragic killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, an act of violence that shocks the conscience.
Yet what is perhaps less shocking is the public's reaction to this tragedy. Thompson's death has ignited a storm of commentary, much of it reflecting long-simmering frustration with the insurance industry. As the Boston Globe's STAT observed on Friday, "the attack has prompted fresh reflection on the broken U.S. health care system."
That such a reaction has emerged, regardless of the facts of the killing, speaks volumes about the depth of discontent with a system many perceive as prioritizing profit over people.
The details surrounding the tragedy are as chilling as they are revealing. Investigators discovered the words DENY and DEFEND (common nomenclature for two of the three pillars of insurance defense—with the other being "delay") inscribed on bullet casings at the scene, a grim reference to the insurance industry's notorious practices. For years, these tactics—denying claims, defending lawsuits at all costs, and deposing claimants into exhaustion—have exemplified a profit-driven model that prioritizes corporate interests over human lives. The haunting inscription is a stark reminder of how deeply these practices have eroded trust in an industry that was designed to provide security.
"[The reaction to this] tragedy highlights the immense human cost of an industry that prioritizes profit over people," said William Cooper, a New York personal injury attorney. "Every day, I see families destroyed—not by accidents or negligence alone, but by an insurance system that erects barriers to justice and healing." Cooper's observations reflect the despair of countless individuals who have sought fairness and compassion, only to encounter roadblocks and bureaucratic indifference.
At the heart of this crisis lies a business model that incentivizes insurers to minimize payouts at the expense of those they serve. For these companies, every denied claim, delayed payment, or protracted legal battle translates into savings that bolsters their bottom line. The infamous deny-defend-delay strategy is more than a cynical slogan; it is a calculated approach that undermines the very purpose of insurance. Policyholders who pay premiums in good faith are often left to navigate a system designed to exhaust and discourage them, compounding the pain of accidents, illnesses, and tragedies.
The human cost of this approach is staggering. Families are forced to delay or forgo medical treatments while battling insurers for coverage. Victims of catastrophic injuries face financial ruin as they await decisions on claims that should be straightforward. Meanwhile, the industry reports record-breaking profits, fueling public outrage. Social media has amplified this anger, providing a platform for people to share harrowing accounts of denied claims, unjust practices, and unresponsive companies. This widespread discontent is not new, but its intensity has grown as the gap between insurers' promises and their actions becomes increasingly apparent.
Against this backdrop, to many people the killing of UnitedHealthcare's CEO is undeniably horrifying, but not entirely shocking. While the vast majority of those frustrated with the insurance industry turn to lawful means—such as lawsuits, advocacy, or public criticism—the reaction to this act of violence underscores the desperation felt when systemic grievances remain unaddressed.
The insurance industry is widely viewed as a system in crisis, and that perception is not without merit. As Cooper explains, the public's frustration is rooted in a profound sense of betrayal. "People aren't angry at insurers because they expect miracles," he said. "They're angry because they paid into these systems, followed the rules, and trusted the promises made to them—only to be abandoned when they needed help the most."
These words capture the heart of the problem: insurance is meant to provide a safety net, a source of stability and peace of mind. When that trust is broken, the consequences are not merely financial but deeply personal and emotional.
Regardless of the true motive behind Thompson's death, this flood of schadenfreude must serve as a wake-up call for both the insurance industry and policymakers. Reforming this broken system is not only a moral imperative but also a practical necessity to prevent further erosion of public trust. Insurers must embrace transparency and accountability, ensuring that policyholders receive clear, timely explanations for decisions and can challenge denials without resorting to costly legal battles. Regulatory oversight must be strengthened to curb practices that prioritize profits over people, and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms should be expanded to reduce the financial and emotional toll of litigation.
Beyond these measures, the insurance industry must undergo a cultural shift. Compassion and profitability are not mutually exclusive. Insurers that prioritize fair treatment and genuine support for their policyholders will ultimately build stronger relationships and foster greater loyalty. Companies that continue to operate under the current profit-at-all-costs model, however, risk further alienating the very people they claim to serve.
No matter how the facts of this case play out, we cannot allow this tragedy to become a justification for cynicism or inaction. Instead, it must galvanize efforts to create a fairer, more compassionate system. Only by addressing the root causes of public frustration can we hope to rebuild trust in the insurance industry and prevent future tragedies. Let this moment be a turning point, not just for the industry but for society as a whole, as we strive toward a more just and humane approach to care and accountability.
A Pulitzer Prize-nominated writer, Aron Solomon, JD, is the chief strategy officer for Amplify. He has taught entrepreneurship at McGill University and the University of Pennsylvania, and was elected to Fastcase 50, recognizing the top 50 legal innovators in the world. Aron has been featured in Newsweek, Fast Company, Fortune, Forbes, CBS News, CNBC, USA Today, ESPN, Abogados, Today's Esquire, TechCrunch, The Hill, BuzzFeed, Venture Beat, The Independent, Fortune China, Yahoo!, ABA Journal, Law.com, The Boston Globe, and many other leading publications across the globe.
Source: What Reaction to a Killing Says About Our Broken Health System | Opinion - Newsweek
|
Big Bob said:
( December 13th, 2024 @ 6:48 pm )
We fight, they laugh all the to the bank. Cheers
|
What Obamacare has done, and it was predictable based on what happened with a similar government program in Australia, was a massive consolidation within all aspects of the medical care industry. Instead of lots of independent providers to choose from, we now have big conglomerates for the most part, both in insurance and in actual provision of care. This has made the system more impersonal and less user friendly. The Democrats' hope was that getting to that stage would encourage citizens to say "Aw, heck, just let the government do it all." That would be going from the frying pan into the fire.
Simply repealling Obamacare at this point would accomplish little because it is more the changes Obamacare instigated that are the problem than Obamacare itself. A path forward needs to be found somehow to encourage more insurance companies to get back into medical insurance so we have some competition, and to unwind these medical conglomerates like Vidant, which are now everywhere in the country. That is a tall order, but something needs to be done because the present system is a huge mess and socialized medicine is much worse. |
What the liberal Democrats were trying to do with both HillaryCare and ObamaCare was to gum up the system so badly that people would accept socialized medicine. They have indeed gummed up the system, and lack of competition in health insurance and health care itself has been a huge problem.
Here is an important comparison between health insurance before Obamacare and now. As Sean Hannity pointed out on his radio show this afternoon, claim denials by all the big health insurers including United Health Insurance were under 2% in 2013 before Obamacare kicked in. Now they are over 15% at most and with United Health Insurance at an astounding 31%. I still do not think people want socialized medicine. Too many are aware of Canada's problems there where people die on waiting lists unable to get timely appointments. Many Canadians come to the US for medical care because they cannot get it at home. The same is true with the UK's National Health Service, where Brits increasingly go to India to get medical care to get around the waiting lists at home. THere was an article recently in a British newspaper about how the NHS would send doctors to make house calls at migrant hotels in areas where it takes many months for a citizen to get an appointment. Yes, we need to cut off the illegal aliens. Send them home for health care. Americans should not have to pay for interlopers who should not even be here. |
I think what you saw with Obama Care was an attempt at changing an awful system. Most Americans agreed change was needed and said so with their votes.
The money interest have been trying to kill it ever since. They have been unsuccessful, however they have adapted. Now most of us have coverage. So what do they do? They decline to cover the cost of all but the most routine care. You have a plan, but you better be careful how you use it. Better make sure you see the right doc. Better make sure the ambulance takes you to the right hospital. Better hope you dont need expensive treatment for a serious disease. They can't cancel the policy, but they can deny care until you are to weak or too dead to fight them any more. Who to blame? Every politician, right or left, who takes their money and hopes you dont notice. It's insane. |
There were two people close to what was going on in the medical field with Obamacare whose comments I heard that bear on how Obamacare changed medicine.
One was my own primary care physcian here in Washington, when I expressed surprise that he and his partners had sold their practice to Vidant. He explained that Obamacare created a bureaucratic nightmare for doctors in its regulations that was going to be costly and timeconsuming for them if they stayed independent but by selling to Vidant, that would be Vidant's headache, not theirs. The other thing they thought about when Vidant approached them with an offer to buy their practice was that right then their practice had a value on the market but where the government was going on healthcare, it might not in the future. So they pocketed the value of their practice and became salaried employees of Vidant with the same annual income as when they were independent. That process seems to have been repeated many times over all around the country. THe other comment had to do with an international organization I was working for. At our annual interenational retreat in Washington, DC. After Obamacare passed, one of the speakers was the organization's health insurance consultant who negotitated our group health insurance provisions with insurance companies. He told us that the changes with Obamacare would mean a choice. If we kept all the coverage we had, it would cost more, and if we kept the rates we had, we would have less coverage. This was because under OBamacare, everyong in all group health plans was put in one big pool, and the health profile of that pool was worse than the health profile of our organization's own employyees. Insurance rates for group plans were based on health profiles of the people to be insured. He also said some insurance companies were getting out of the health care field entirely due to Obamacare, and less competition would also push prices up and coverage down. He did tell us the changes for group health were significant but not as severe as the changes for individual health insurance would be. |
I guess everything is about race to a race hustler like Bobbie, but our Obamacare mess is NOT. It is about a longterm scheme by leftwing Democrats to capture our health system. Their first big play was HillaryCare during the Clinton regime but that bombed. Those who concocted what later became known in popular culture as "Obamacare" were actually white leftists, many of them retreads from HillaryCare.
All of the regulations and rules of Obamacare are what led to the mass centralization of our health care, including health insurance, that destroyed choice for American consumers. Here in Beaufort County, we had two independent hospitals prior to OBamcare, but post Obamacare, Vidant in Greensville bought both and closed one. Vidant also bought up many of what had been independent doctors offices. All of that was driven by Obamacare, and that consolidation is not good for consumer choice. Similarly many of the insurance companies that used to offer health insurance got out of that business after Obamacare, and that also destroyed consumer choice. HillaryCare would have done exactly the same. That was all predictable since that had also been the result of Australia's government medicine program called Medicare, which had also seen massive consolidation and centralization in health care, to the point that a subsequent govenrment that looked into ending Medicare (the Australian equivalent of Obamacare) found that all of the centralization that had occured made it impossible to go back to what had previously worked better for Australians. Oh, and as to those insurance companies, I am sure you will find their stockholders are of all races, and so are their employees. This is NOT a racial issue, dude. |
One of the things that is destroying our health care system is giving free care to hordes of illegal aliens. That needs to stop. We do not need to let these parasites mooch off of our health care system. France's Interior Minister recently proposed eliminating free health care for illegal aliens in France, and it is something that needs to be done here.
When hostpitals have to give free care to illegal aliens, the hospitals make up for it by charging American citizens higher prices. Since insurance has to pay those higher prices for its policy holders, that drives up the cost of health insurance. Right now, hospitals are bound to do that under a federal law that they cannot turn anyone away. That needs to be changed to say that they cannot turn any CITIZEN away. If an illegal alien has an acute emergency, like a car wreck or heart attack, compassion would say that we should give them immediate treatment, but for anything else, we should just offer them a plane ticket home for their medical care. Hospitals, the American taxpayer, and health insurance policy holders should NOT be burdened with medical care for illegal aliens. |
There is a huge list that needs to be taken care of in our health system.
A major help would be the elimination of CON (Certificate of Need) and then Tort Reform. Texas is a good model. They were successful in killing CON and getting reasonable limits on Tort Reform. Competition always improves service. We do not have sufficient GP’s because the system discourages local practices. |
Rich white companies act like United Health and you try and blame Obama.
You’re such a racist idiot. |
Isn't it "funny" how they glorify a serial killer like Dahmer in modern Pop Culture but label Kaczynski as a raging lunatic? These handlers are becoming very predictable.
Did they honestly think anyone would have sympathy towards a greedy "top o' the pyramid" character like Thompson? Again, this is like something out of a comic book. People need to start thinking past the 4th wall here. |
I have always said that Insurance Companies are just like Gambling
Casinos. The House always wins. It's designed that way. |
What broke our health care system was Obamacare which destroyed competition and forced a massive consolidation in health care. It reduced the number of insurers and raised insurance rates significantly for many while also reducing coverage for many. In many of the Obamacare "makerplaces" there is now only one choice of insurance companies for consumers to "choose" from. These monopolistic or oligopolistic conditions breed poor customer service. At the same time, many medical practices that had been private were pushed by Obamacare to sell to large medical conglomerates, like Vidant in our area. Again, the destruction of competition was devastating for consumer choice.
Can the mess that Obamacare has created be unscrambled? It will be difficult because of all the consolidation that has happened. Some insurance companies that had offered medical insurance got out of the market due to Obamacare, and it would take massive changes to get them back in. There are a few good options out there like the Christian-based Medishare. It could be worse, Many Democrats push "single payer" otherwise known as socialized medicine, where "death by waiting list" is all too common as in Canada and the UK. At least the UK does have a paralel medical system with private hospitals, doctors, and insurance. Most doctors in the socialized National Health System buy private medical insurance becaue they know from first hand experience that the care is better and more timely in the private system. |