Martin and Edmisten Demonstrate What’s Wrong with Today’s Politics | Eastern North Carolina Now

Tom Campbell
    In 1984, Jim Martin and Rufus Edmisten were opponents in our state's gubernatorial election. As with any statewide election, it was a hard fought contest, but one that can provide lessons for today.

    Martin was completing his sixth term as Congressman from the 9th district. The job was taking a toll on his young family and he wanted to return to North Carolina. He believed 1984 could be a good year for Republicans, especially with a popular Ronald Reagan running for re-election. The 50 year-old thought lessons he learned in Washington could help to our state.

    Jim Hunt was completing his second four-year term as Governor and was prohibited from running again. Ten Democrats ran for the Primary nomination. Because Hunt was engaged in a U.S. Senate fight he refused to endorse any of the candidates. A highly divisive primary ended in a runoff election, with Rufus Edmisten, who had served nine years as Attorney General, declared the winner.

    Both Martin and Edmisten were personable, had good platforms, good advisors and could raise money. Before the days when elections were conducted primarily on the airwaves they traveled the state campaigning, sometimes appearing on the same platform at forums.

    Whenever they appeared together Edmisten says that Martin, the former college professor, would good-naturedly grade his speeches. He says he got C's and D's but never higher than a B grade. Martin retorted there were many Davidson chemistry graduates, who later became Ph. D's but never got better than a B from him.

    Jim Martin was featured this week at the N.C. Museum of History in Raleigh, the subject of a new book, Catalyst, written by John Hood, former head of the John Locke Foundation and now syndicated columnist and NC SPIN television panelist. Edmisten sat on the front row. He and Martin traded jovial exchanges during the event. Edmisten reported Martin never said a bad word about him. Martin said the same about Edmisten. It was obvious the two like and respect each other and commented on how the political environment today is so much different than when they opposed each other in 1984.

    Polarization and partisanship are more prevalent. Television and radio ads have replaced many of the personal appearances at forums, events and stops in restaurants and country stores. Those ads contain disparaging and nasty campaign messages today in lieu candidates touting their own qualifications and platforms. Opposition research, if even in existence then, was less often employed. Instead Candidates publicly demonstrated mutual respect and deference to their opponents.

    Asked what it would take to be successful in politics today Martin stated that both parties have become so polarized that they have forgotten people in the middle. Centrists have abandoned both political parties, as the rapid growth in unaffiliated voters demonstrates. If they want to win, candidates must pay attention to voters in the middle. Republicans especially must realize the changing demographics of our state, the rapid growth in minorities, and broaden the GOP's appeal to them. Both also agreed that rather than disparage those of the other party it was essential to work together for everyone's mutual benefit.

    As Martin concluded, if you see a turtle on a fencepost you have to know he didn't get there by himself.

    Publisher's note: Tom Campbell is former assistant North Carolina State Treasurer and is creator/host of NC SPIN, a weekly statewide television discussion of NC issues airing Sundays at 11:00 am on WITN-TV. Contact Tom at NC Spin.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comment

( October 14th, 2015 @ 4:05 pm )
 
Some good insights into why NC was so PROGRESSIVE in the mid-80's and now . . .

We have made a bad mistake to employ the politics of hate and distraction in an attempt to control NC. I was in this state from 1967-70 and left for SC concluding "Raleigh would never be more than a Capital Cow Town." Boy, was I ever wrong!!!

The reason was cooperative government with an eye on the future rather than only the past. I returned to Rocky Mount in 1986 and represented a good insurance company all over eastern NC. It was obvious at that time of mid-80's NC was going for the future in a big way. Education was up / a new Medical College was established in Greenville. The RTP was rolling and a new jetport at Kinston promised to change things for the better and grow business into the vacuum of tobacco going down.

Textiles have left over cheap labor. Drugs and Crime have replaced them as the core of the NC economy.

It seems to me that it is time to re-evaluate our priorities and start working TOGETHER instead of trying to replicate DC madness in a good and Progressive state leading the SE to a bright future. . .



Mrs. Clinton - A History of Bad Choices! My Spin, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics MLK monument to be erected at Stone Mountain, Ga--Let Freedom Ring


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

populist / nationalist anti-immigration AfD most popular party among young voters, CDU second
Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump

HbAD1

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.
Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top