On "Common Sense Legislation" | Beaufort County Now | I cannot help but notice a trend in politicians using the adjective "common sense" to advocate for a legislation, typically that of a controversial nature which there is weak evidence to support the need for or its effectiveness

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

On "Common Sense Legislation"

    This was rhetorical analysis of a press release from a politician I am not disclosing, but in the process I got off track, and the essay turned into a rant on people using the phrase "common sense" to justify the ridiculous bills, not just the ridiculous demands of the initial politician.

    I cannot help but notice a trend in politicians using the adjective "common sense" to advocate for a legislation, typically that of a controversial nature which there is weak evidence to support the need for or its effectiveness. Before anyone plays the bipartisan blame game, statists of both the "left" and "right" engage in this rhetorical tactic, and both should be ridiculed by their constituents for doing so. You can see this description being used in legislation from expanding the PATRIOT Act (or as I like to call it, the Unpatriotic Act), to gun control.

    However, from the perspective of a writer, I do admire the way this tactic is used. It acts as an insult to the political opponent by declaring that they lack the intellectual competency to effectively govern, while also gaining moral high ground in declaring yourself the arbitrator of wisdom; the person who knew all along that this was the right path, but everyone else was too stupid to notice it until you came along. As well, like always with political factions, the enemy party is the devil. It mimics cult-like behavior in a strange way with followers of these political parties, but that is a story for another day. Of course, that is entirely fallacious thus should not be taken seriously in logical discussions, but a lot of people have no will to be logical.

    Another reason politicians may use this slogan, I believe, as a means of historical appeal. One document which played a significant role in the American Revolution was entitled "Common Sense" by Thomas Paine. The ironic thing is that, if the politician is intending for historical appeal, most of the time "common sense" is used to describe legislation, said legislation is almost always an expansion of power. Thomas Paine was not a supporter of big governments, he viewed government as a necessary evil, thus would likely be cautious of such expansions. To quote the pamphlet, "Society is produced by our wants, and government by wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher." So if a politician intends to use this historical appeal to sway support for their power grabs, is that not hypocritical of them?

    By simply declaring your argument as common sense is though you may have attracted more people with a bleeding heart type personality or people who feel self-conscious about their intellect, but you do not make an argument for why it is the appropriate action. Most politicians accompany their so-called "common sense" legislation with reasons, though they may be supported by fallacious claims. However, I commonly see supporters of these legislations not have an argument, instead cite the current year or claiming the legislation to be common sense; neither the current year or a declaration of common sense are arguments.

    Saying that your new law is common sense has no base to it. You might as well be saying, "this law is super cool;" it lacks substance. But I expect for the politicians who represent me to say something with substance, that is unrealistic I suppose. I guess I will just have to settle with these statists who claim to stand for liberty, but in reality they only do when it looks pretty.

    Now you may be asking yourselves, "how do I boast about my bill without using stupid slogans." Simple, don't. It is more logical to brag about including number lines on the bill than to cite your bill as "common sense" as a reason for why it should be supported by the public or political opponents.
Go Back


( September 5th, 2016 @ 6:19 pm )
You make some very good points. I suspect that politicians using "common sense" is the last step before resorting to "name-calling". As in you are a "insert your favorite pejorative name here." Who could disagree with a common sense point unless they were a "insert your favorite pejorative name here."

Governor McCrory Urges Residents and Visitors to Get Ready for Tropical Storm Hermine Plight, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Congressman Mark Walker Joins Donald Trump's Call for a Special Prosecutor to Investigate Hillary Clinton's Pay-For-Play Scheme


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

"Never let a crisis go to waste." How much of this will we take?
climate alarmists claimed it was dying and would soon be completely dead
Chancellor Kurz takes firm action again: US needs to follow his lead
Why were we doing business helping the Chi Coms build weapons of mass destruction (germ warfare)?
Jordan Hall, the pastor of Fellowship Baptist Church in Sidney, Montana, preaches a blistering, barn burning yet biblically faithful sermon on transgenderism and transhumanism. It grabs you from the get-go and doesn’t let up. Give it a listen!


Retired SEAL's run for House seats in Congress
In recent years, our asylum laws have been abused and misused by illegal immigrants who are primarily economic migrants and are not otherwise eligible to immigrate to the United States
Timed to Gates/Soros purchase of covid testing company
In case you haven’t been paying attention, Los Angeles Angels pitcher and hitter Shohei Ohtani has been on fire at the plate.
Gov. Roy Cooper this year said his administration was exploring the development of a vaccine passport for residents.


Back to Top