Obama Could Win By Losing | Eastern North Carolina Now

   Publisher's note: The article below appeared in John Hood's daily column in his publication, the Carolina Journal, which, because of Author / Publisher Hood, is inextricably linked to the John Locke Foundation.

    RALEIGH     A few days ago, both Republicans and Democrats celebrated the second anniversary of the passage of the Affordable Care Act, the signature program of President Obama's administration.

    Well, okay, perhaps "celebrate" isn't quite the right word to describe Republican sentiment. GOP lawmakers voted overwhelmingly against ObamaCare at every stage in its legislative development. They properly consider it to be an unnecessarily expensive and expansive response to the real problems facing American health care. They properly saw the individual mandate and other provisions to be beyond the constitutional authority of the federal government.

    But in the short run,
John Hood
Republicans have been among the chief beneficiaries of ObamaCare. Its passage doomed the reelection bids of many incumbent Democrats who voted for it, such as North Carolina's own Rep. Bob Etheridge. ObamaCare and the economy's weak performance during 2010 were the major reasons why the GOP had one of the most successful midterm election cycles in its history - recapturing the U.S. House by a healthy margin, making major gains in the U.S. Senate, and winning more power in statehouses and legislatures than the Republicans have enjoyed since the 1920s.

    As for the Democrats who truly did celebrate the anniversary of ObamaCare last week, they either believe that increasing federal taxes, subsidies, and regulatory control over health care was a good idea or are trying desperately not to weaken the president's political position in an election year.

    I think both of their assumptions are incorrect. I think that nationalizing the regulation and subsidy of health care was a horrible idea, one destined to increase cost and decrease freedom. And politically, President Obama would be better off if Americans thought less about his health care plan, which they dislike, and more about policies they actually like such as the president's payroll-tax cut or his order to take out Osama bin Laden.

    Unfortunately for the president and his party, events have conspired to put the media spotlight squarely on health care. Yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court began hearing arguments in the pivotal constitutional challenge to ObamaCare. It will be the longest oral argument before the high court in more than 40 years. The justices will be asked to address fundamental issues about the relationship between Washington and the states, the relationship between Washington and private individuals, and the extent to which we as Americans enjoy the right to conduct our private affairs as we see fit rather than as some lawmaker or regulator dictates we must.

    I won't restate the main legal arguments in the case, as I have written about them a number of times in the past and there are far better explorations of the constitutional issues at stake in two new articles I will commend to your attention.

    First, David Rivkin and Lee Casey are former Justice Department attorneys who have represented 26 states in their constitutional challenge to ObamaCare. In a Wall Street Journal piece, they summed up the federalism argument nicely:

    Americans cannot escape the individual mandate by any means because it regulates them as people, simply because they are alive and here. That requires police power authority. Permitting Congress to exercise that authority -- however important its ultimate goal -- is not constitutionally proper and would forever warp the federal-state division of authority.

    Second, attorney Adam White wrote a lengthy cover story in The Weekly Standard that lays out the history of the case and its major components. His conclusion:

    Unprecedented powers asserted by the government threaten to give rise to stark abuses of power--some foreseeable, perhaps many more unforeseeable. Faced with similarly novel assertions of government power in previous cases, the Court drew a constitutional line in the sand, out of an abundance of caution. The Court's review of the individual mandate poses no less a challenge, and merits no less a response.

    No one knows for sure which way the Court will rule. I have predicted in the past that parts or all of ObamaCare will be struck down, paving the way for true health care reform legislation to emerge from Congress in 2013. What I will predict now is that such a result would, in fact, be in President Obama's net political interest. It would be a costly blow in the short run, but would reduce the salience of the issue by November.
Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

Key State and Federal Primaries to Watch in 2012 John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics The Tea Party and NC Senate candidate Randy Ramsey


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

National and state
Efforts to remove former President Donald Trump from state ballots in the 2024 election are ramping up nationwide after critics argued the leading Republican contender is constitutionally disqualified from serving as president after he “engaged in insurrection” against the United States.
Jacksonville Sheriff T.K. Waters slammed the political Left’s anti-gun narrative over the weekend in response to a racially motivated shooting that killed three people at a Dollar General store that has been deemed as racially motivated.
Attorney General Merrick Garland's integrity was called into question during a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday when Republican lawmakers noted the "Kill Trump" tattoo emblazoned on his forehead.
The House Oversight Committee has picked a date to hold its first hearing in the impeachment inquiry against President Joe Biden.


House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) said over the weekend that Democrats were “very concerned” over the prospect that President Joe Biden could soon be impeached by the Republican-controlled chamber.
She woke up Monday morning complaining about feeling “kinda punk.” After breakfast I found her on the front porch wrapped in a blanket, shivering in the 90-degree temperature.
Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) let President Joe Biden’s family have it during a recent appearance on Fox News’ “Hannity,” saying that Americans being lectured about “privilege” by Biden was “like being lectured about gun safety by Alec Baldwin.”
A local conservative man was frustrated today after waking up and scrolling through his social media accounts and finding out he is now required to come out in defense of Jason Aldean's music.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website appeared to have quietly stopped collecting COVID-19 vaccine adverse events on the federal agency’s V-safe website earlier this summer.



Back to Top