Publisher's note: This informational nugget was sent to me by Ben Shapiro, who represents the Daily Wire, and since this is one of the most topical news events, it should be published on BCN.
The author of this post is Amanda Prestigiacomo.
Former Atlanta police officer Garrett Rolfe, involved in the shooting of Rayshard Brooks at a Wendy's parking lot last week, was charged
with felony murder on Wednesday. On Thursday, Rolfe's legal team released a statement defending his "justified" actions.
"Rolfe is facing 11 counts, including felony murder and assault with a deadly weapon," The Daily Wire
reported Wednesday evening, adding that Devin Brosnan, Rolfe's partner, has been placed on administrative leave and is facing three charges.
The incident on Friday started when a Wendy's employee called the police after Brooks, under the influence of alcohol, passed out behind the wheel, blocking drive-through traffic.
"The officers ran Brooks through a field sobriety test and a breathalyzer that pegged Brooks' blood alcohol concentration at .108%, according to body cam footage released by the Atlanta police department. The legal limit to drive is .08%,"
The Daily Wire noted. "After cooperating for nearly half an hour, Brooks fought with the officers as they tried to place him in handcuffs. All three struggled and fell to the ground where Brooks managed to take Brosnan's taser and escape the officers. Rolfe shot after Brooks fired the stolen taser at him."
"Officer Rolfe is well known to the courts and there is no compelling reason to bring any charges against them before the GBI has completed its investigation and published its findings,"
Rolfe's attorney said in a statement
following the felony murder charge.
In a separate statement
, Brosnan's attorney ripped Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard for the "rush to misjudgment."
"The decision to initiate charges by the Fulton County DA's office is irrational and obviously based on factors which should have nothing to do with the proper administration of justice,"
the attorney said in a blistering rebuke of the DA. "This was not a rush to judgment. This was a rush to misjudgment."
Ahead of the announced charges from DA Howard, the LoRusso Law Firm, which is representing Rolfe, released a lengthy statement dissecting the Friday incident and their client's "justified" actions.
"On June 12, 2020, a Wendy's employee called 911 to report a man was passed out behind the wheel of his vehicle and blocking traffic in the drive-through,"
the statement begins, as reported by CBS46
. "Officer Brosnan responded, and made contact with the driver, Rayshard Brooks. After determining alcohol may have been a contributing factor, he requested Officer Rolfe's assistance."
"Officer Rolfe, a member of the High Intensity Traffic Team and the Governor funded HEAT Unit, has specialized training in DUI investigations,"
the statement continues. "He has made at least 300 DUI arrests, and completed the 160-hour Drug Recognition Expert course, graduating as valedictorian. After a thorough investigation, Officer Rolfe determined Mr. Brooks was impaired and driving a vehicle in violation of Georgia law. Officer Rolfe was polite and courteous to Mr. Brooks during the entire encounter. Mr. Brooks was polite and cooperative until Officer Rolfe placed him under arrest."
Then, according to Rolfe's attorneys, Brooks became hostile "without warning or provocation,"
physically assaulting the officers until Rolfe "lawfully deployed his TASER twice, but it had no effect on Mr. Brooks"
"Mr. Brooks continued his assault and disarmed Officer Brosnan, stealing his city-issued TASER committing a robbery, another forcible felony under Georgia law,"
- Suddenly, without warning or provocation, Mr. Brooks chose to violently attack two uniformed police officers. Officers Brosnan and Rolfe used the least amount of force possible in their attempts to place Mr. Brooks into handcuffs. They attempted to leverage him to the ground while giving him loud, clear verbal commands. In response, Mr. Brooks continued actively resisting lawful efforts to arrest him. He then escalated his resistance by punching Officer Rolfe in the face committing several counts of felony obstruction of an officer. See O.C.G.A. §16-10-24. In an effort to place Mr. Brooks under arrest and stop his assault, Officer Rolfe lawfully deployed his TASER twice, but it had no effect on Mr. Brooks.
the law firm notes. "See O.C.G.A. §16-8-40 & O.C.G.A. §16-10-33 . Mr. Brooks, then armed, began running through a crowded parking lot. Mr. Brooks was lawfully under arrest and Officer Rolfe pursued him. Officer Rolfe had deployed his taser and held it steady in hopes the prongs would catch onto Mr. Brooks body and neutralize him. Unfortunately, that didn't occur."
"Instead of merely trying to escape, Mr. Brooks reached back with his arm extended and pointed an object at Officer Rolfe,"
the statement reads. "Officer Rolfe heard a sound like a gunshot and saw a flash in front of him. Fearing for his safety, and the safety of the civilians around him, Officer Rolfe dropped his taser and fired his service weapon at the only portion of Mr. Brooks that presented to him - Mr. Brooks' back. Officer Rolfe immediately stopped firing when Mr. Brooks fell to the ground since there was no longer an imminent threat towards Officer Rolfe or others."
"Officer Rolfe gathered himself, and then immediately called for EMS,"
the legal representation continues. "Officer Rolfe retrieved first-aid supplies and began rendering aid to Mr. Brooks. When Mr. Brooks' pulse stopped, Officer Rolfe immediately began CPR until EMS relieved him."
"The loss of life in any instance is tragic,"
Rolfe's lawyers emphasize. "However, Officer Rolfe's actions were justified under O.C.G.A. §17-4-20 and O.C.G.A. §16-3-21."
"A peace officer may use deadly force to 1. arrest a suspected felon when he reasonably believes that the suspect poses an immediate threat of physical violence to the officer or others, 2. to protect himself and others from a life-threatening injury, and 3. to prevent the commission of a forcible felony. Mr. Brooks violently attacked two officers and disarmed one of them. When Mr. Brooks turned and pointed an object at Officer Rolfe, any officer would have reasonably believed that he intended to disarm, disable, or seriously injure him."
The statement concludes: "Officer Rolfe is well known to the courts and there is no compelling reason to bring any charges against them before the GBI has completed its investigation and published its findings."