Appeals Court Hearing: Pelosi/Schiff Argue Congress Can Secretly Subpoena Phone Records of Citizens | Beaufort County Now | Judicial Watch today released a transcript of the March 24 oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit challenging a lower court ruling upholding the secrecy of controversial secretly-issued congressional subpoenas

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Appeals Court Hearing: Pelosi/Schiff Argue Congress Can Secretly Subpoena Phone Records of Citizens

Press Release:

    Washington, DC     Judicial Watch today released a transcript of the March 24 oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit challenging a lower court ruling upholding the secrecy of controversial secretly-issued congressional subpoenas for phone records by Rep. Adam Schiff, Chairman of the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, relating to the impeachment of President Trump. The appeals court hearing came after a lower court ruling in the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Judicial Watch v. v Adam Schiff and U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (No. 1:19-03790)), requesting subpoenas issued by the Committee on or about September 30, 2019.

    The Judicial Watch lawsuit sought the controversial impeachment-related subpoenas for phone records, including those of Rudy Giuliani, President Trump's lawyer. Schiff and the Committee are being represented by the Office of General Counsel for the House of Representatives.

    The phone records led to the publication of the private phone records of Giuliani, Congressman Devin Nunes, journalist John Solomon, Trump attorney Jay Sekulow, attorney Victoria Toensing, and other American citizens.

    Schiff and the Committee claim "sovereign immunity;" "Speech or Debate Clause" privilege; immunity from FOIA and transparency law; that the records are secret; and that Judicial Watch and public do not need to see them. Judicial Watch is appealing a lower court decision suggested that Schiff and the House have "absolute" immunity from inquiries about the subpoenas.

    Judicial Watch senior attorney James Peterson argued to the three-judge panel:

  • This case is about shedding light on unprecedented and illegitimate congressional subpoenas. The extraordinary subpoenas at issue represent a supposedly unlimited government surveillance power and an unlimited ability by Congress to, at their whim, to invade the privacy of any American.
  • ***
  • Congressman Schiff secretly subpoenaed the phone records of a number of private citizens from telephone companies. He did not provide notice to these individuals in advance that their phone records were being sought. He did not subpoena the phone records directly from the citizens. Instead, he subpoenaed the phone companies for the records, preventing any opportunity for the private citizens to seek court review, as would happen in any other case in where the government is seeking this kind of information about any citizen.

    In response to a House attorney's argument that the materials be kept secret to protect the privacy of the targets of the subpoenas, one of the appellate judges remarked:

  • Well, I do think it's, if not ironic, noteworthy that one of the interests you've just put forward is the invasion of privacy when the whole claim of Judicial Watch is that this Committee invaded the privacy of private citizens in the first place.

    "The Pelosi/Schiff House asserts it has an unlimited government surveillance power and an unlimited ability to invade the privacy of any American with zero accountability and transparency," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "The courts should reject Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi's corrupt cover-up of the unconstitutional subpoenas that abused the civil rights of then-President Trump, Rudy Giuliani, journalists and other American citizens."
Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

If you follow state politics, you have no doubt heard of crossover day on the legislative calendar.
Question the integrity of the 2020 election and Biden competency to be Commander-In-Chief
Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Defense seeking records of communications between Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and other top military officials regarding Fox News and its host Tucker Carlson
She has courage. But politics demands more than that.
Hayden Ludwig writes for the Washington Free Beacon about a foreign source of funding for Democratic electoral shenanigans.
The recent hiring of New York Times columnist Nikole Hannah-Jones as a faculty member in UNC-Chapel Hillís Hussman School of Journalism raises serious red flags about how the university is being run.
Today, U.S. Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) spoke on the Senate floor honoring the service and sacrifice of law enforcement officers during National Police Week.

HbAD1

N.C. senators are moving forward an omnibus criminal justice reform bill that would make a wide range of changes to state law in response to recent cases of rioting, violence against first responders, and accusations of police brutality.
Former University of Hawaii quarterback Colt Brennan, has passed away at 37, according to Brennanís father, Terry.
Bill would eliminate provisions that broadly criminalize rules violations of certain occupational licensing boards
Good move. We should all support this common sense legislation
I wrote this article a while back and recent developments make it very clear that the words in this article are being be borne out.
James Antle of the Washington Examiner highlights Republicansí contrasting approaches to the 45th presidentís legacy.
Governor Roy Cooper has appointed Mark Sternlicht to serve as Superior Court Judge for Judicial District 12 in serving Cumberland County.
Graham Piro of the Washington Free Beacon documents state-level efforts to safeguard religious freedom during a pandemic.

HbAD2

 
Back to Top