Election map defenders file motion supporting Berger Jr.’s participation | Beaufort County Now | Legislative defendants in North Carolina’s redistricting lawsuits are opposing efforts to have Supreme Court Justice Phil Berger Jr. disqualified from the case.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    Legislative defendants in North Carolina's redistricting lawsuits are opposing efforts to have Supreme Court Justice Phil Berger Jr. disqualified from the case.

    In a brief filed Monday, the Republican defendants argue there's no reason for Berger, also a Republican, to step away from the high-profile dispute over congressional and legislative election maps.

    Critics urge Berger's disqualification because his father serves as leader of the state Senate. Sen. Phil Berger's official title is president pro tempore.

    "Justice Berger has noted in a separate case challenging the constitutionality of amendments to the Constitution, wherein North Carolina Senate President Pro Tempore Berger is a party in his official capacity, that he can impartially and faithfully execute his role as a Justice in suits against the State," according to the brief from attorney Phillip Strach. "The question is whether this redistricting challenge warrants a different recusal outcome than other suits challenging a North Carolina law. It does not."

    Strach disputed arguments from election map challengers, identified in this instance as "movants."

    "Movants argue that Senator Berger is more directly implicated in this case than in others. But that is not the case," Strach wrote.

    "It is true that Senator Berger's senate district is challenged as a gerrymandered district; however, that is not why he is named party in his official capacity," Strach added. "It is also misleading to suggest that the redistricting challenge here isolates Senator Berger apart from the dozens of other incumbent senators whose districts are being challenged in this litigation."

    "This litigation covers multiple congressional, state House, and state Senate districts. Further, the boundaries of Senator Berger's district in the enacted maps were the subject of an amendment proffered by Senator Ben Clark, a Democrat, and supported openly in the Senate Standing Committee on Redistricting and Elections by Senator Gladys Robinson, an incumbent Democrat from Guilford County."

    "Senator Berger did not draw any of the boundary lines that are in question and even had an excused absence from voting on the enacted North Carolina Senate plan," Strach added.

    Strach also took aim at the argument that Justice Berger should avoid the case because of Sen. Berger's role in appointing committee members during the redistricting process.

    "That the President Pro Tempore of the Senate appoints senators to committees does not set the redistricting process apart from other legislation, but instead makes it similar to the process of other legislation," Strach wrote. "Nearly all legislation in North Carolina is authored or sponsored by legislators and travels through committees appointed in part by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate before becoming law. There is no reason why this fact would support a unique basis for recusal of Justice Berger: his father is still named only in his official capacity."

    "At the end of the day the relevant decision for Justice Berger is whether this case presents itself as something other than a suit against the State," Strach concluded. "It does not."

    Based on a Dec. 23 Supreme Court order, Justice Berger will make his own decision about whether to take part in the case. He already has decided to reject a similar request for disqualification from a case addressing two high-profile constitutional amendments.

    Despite the Dec. 23 order, plaintiffs in the redistricting case titled Harper v. Hall have asked for Berger's disqualification. Harper plaintiffs issued a Jan. 11 motion renewing their original Dec. 7 request for Berger to step away from the case.

    On the other side of the case, defendants have challenged Democratic Justices Anita Earls and Sam "Jimmy" Ervin IV for potential recusal.

    In contrast, a separate group of plaintiffs led by the N.C. League for Conservation Voters has asked all seven N.C. Supreme Court justices to take part in the redistricting case.

    Oral arguments in the case are scheduled Feb. 2.
Go Back


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Two Massachusetts Institute of Technology graduates have taken issue with their alma mater’s recent moves to become more woke, saying the decisions are “damaging” to the school and its commitment to academic freedom.
Paper straws in the Golden City will now come with a 15-second self-destruct timer to help customers understand how close they are to having their straw dissolve into a pile of useless goo.
Following his damaging testimony at the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, Gaige Grosskreutz was brought on “Good Morning America” to mock the teen accused of killing two rioters in Kenosha, Wisconsin, and injuring Grosskreutz.
The Carolina Journal makes a wide sweeping evaluation of the news that most effects us here in North Carolina, and is distilled, here on BCN, for your clear understanding by the electronic means of video broadcast.
Elon Musk’s SpaceX, an aerospace company that he created, reportedly paid a woman $250,000 to settle a sexual misconduct claim against him stemming from an alleged incident several years ago.
A disturbing report from the DOJ has revealed that up to 50,000 wives go missing each year in Cracker Barrel's country store, never to be seen again. This phenomenon has been occurring for decades but is only just now coming to light.


Analysts at a top U.S. bank are warning that nationwide gas prices could skyrocket from their current $4.589 average per gallon to more than $6 per gallon by the end of summer.
Especially during an election season, taxpayers must be wary of calls to expand government
A change in N.C. law in 2017 ensures that a primary election candidate can win with just over 30% of the vote.
The New York Times has again fallen for anti-Israel propaganda, this time uncritically reporting that a Palestinian professor “calmly teaches Israeli poetry.”
According to sources, local family man Donald Playfield decided to start packing his things just 12 minutes before leaving on a two-week vacation to Yucatán, Mexico.


A few things against the digital learning initiative and the use of technology in the classroom.


Back to Top