Judge Strikes Down San Francisco Law Allowing Non-Citizens To Vote | Eastern NC Now

In a ruling released on Friday, a judge struck down a San Francisco city ordinance allowing non-citizens to vote in school board elections.

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Michael Whittaker.

    In a ruling released on Friday, a judge struck down a San Francisco city ordinance allowing non-citizens to vote in school board elections.

    The ordinance, which allowed non-citizen parents of school-aged children to vote in school board elections, was approved in 2016 and took effect in 2018, and was extended indefinitely in 2021. The law was challenged by various groups, including the California Public Policy Foundation and the United States Justice Foundation.

    "The State of California has a long-standing requirement that voters must be United States citizens," the plaintiffs argued. "This requirement applies to every election in the state, even those conducted by charter cities, because determining voter qualifications is a matter of statewide concern where state law supersedes conflicting charter city ordinances."

    The court agreed.

    "Transcendent law of California, the Constitution ... reserves the right to vote to a United States citizen, contrary to (the) San Francisco ordinance," San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer said in a ruling that will prohibit the city from counting non-citizen votes.

    The lawsuit also argued that because the San Francisco Unified School District receives money from state taxpayers, the entire state has an interest in the qualifications of its voters, and the city does not have unlimited autonomy to redefine who is eligible to vote.

    A similar law in New York City, which would have allowed up to 800,000 non-citizens to vote in city elections, was struck down in June.

    San Francisco has not indicated whether or not it plans to appeal the case.

poll#147
Do you consider Election Integrity an issue of some real importance, or just another conspiracy theory interfering with Democratic Socialist political hegemony?
  No, complete access to everyone voting, even in a willy nilly manner, is more important than getting it right by limiting access to those that would commit Voter Fraud.
  Yes, the most inalienable right of real citizens of this Democratic Republic is the Right to Vote, and that right shall remain sacrosanct for perpetuity.
  Again, I don't vote and I don't care.
730 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Obama’s Ambassador To China: China Views ‘Poor Joe Biden’ As ‘Weak’ Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Human Remains, Artifacts Found At Revolutionary War Battlefield Site In New Jersey


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
she was actually 86, and says she did not vote in the 51 elections records show
"We are leveraging counterterrorism tools and global partnerships to deter this threat before it metastasizes," an official shared.
The impressions of our youth are indelibly branded in our hearts and minds. As I think of June 6, 1944 (D Day) it always seems that it was my war. I was nine years old.

HbAD1

Not giving our kids their own devices was one of the best parenting decisions my husband and I made.
far left group denounced conservatives as nazis but they were funding REAL nazis
How federal policies influenced family formation and the mid-20th century baby boom — and could do so again.
many sheriffs also refusing to enforce it, as lawsuits against state proliferate

HbAD2

 
 
Back to Top