Majority Of Twitter Shareholders Want Elon Musk At Helm Of The Company: Report | Eastern North Carolina Now | A majority of Twitter shareholders voted in favor of a $44 billion deal to sell the social media company to Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, according to a recent report from Reuters.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Ben Zeisloft.

    A majority of Twitter shareholders voted in favor of a $44 billion deal to sell the social media company to Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, according to a recent report from Reuters.

    Multiple sources told the outlet that the deadline for shareholders to submit votes on the deal is on Tuesday, although a sufficient number of investors cast their ballots by Monday evening for the outcome to be determined.

    Musk, however, is attempting to nix the merger. The world's richest man claims that the platform's actual number of fake accounts - otherwise known as bots - could be as high as 33% rather than the company's reported 5%. He argues a lower number of monetizable daily active users potentially justifies a lower valuation. Twitter is therefore battling the multibillionaire in court over his desire to cancel the deal.

    With a 9.6% stake in the company, Musk remains Twitter's largest shareholder, according to a report from Axios. Beyond large asset management companies such as Vanguard and BlackRock, billionaire Saudi Arabian investor Alwaleed bin Talal and former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey are among the largest shareholders, with 3.9% and 2.4% stakes, respectively.

    Court proceedings last week revealed that Musk had texted Michael Grimes, a managing director at investment bank Morgan Stanley, on May 8 to express concerns about the Russian invasion of Ukraine and its effects on the global economy. "Let's slow down just a few days. Putin speech tomorrow is extremely important," Musk wrote. "It won't make sense to buy Twitter if we're heading into World War III."

    The text could potentially place Musk in breach of contract, which mandates that the buyer use his best efforts to complete an acquisition deal, and could refute the claim that an inaccurate count of fake users is behind his hesitancy to purchase the company.

    As Musk mentioned, several technology companies have managed macroeconomic risk by pausing hiring and reducing office space. Twitter reported losses of $0.08 per share in its second-quarter earnings, falling below the $0.14 gain per share expected by analysts. The rough quarter was attributable to "advertising industry headwinds associated with the macroenvironment as well as uncertainty related to the pending acquisition of Twitter by an affiliate of Elon Musk," the company said in a press release.

    Musk's initial offer of $44 billion would give Twitter a valuation of $54.20 per share. The company was trading at roughly $40.50 per share as of Tuesday morning.

    In a victory for Musk's legal team, Delaware Chancery Court Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick granted attorneys representing Musk permission last week to use the testimony of former Twitter executive Peiter "Mudge" Zatko - who claimed in a recent whistleblower report that his colleagues did not have the resources or motivation necessary to determine the number of bots on the platform.

    Zatko, slated to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, claimed that Twitter leadership misled board members and government officials about vulnerabilities that left the company open to hacking, foreign manipulation, and spying. He asserted that one or more current employees work for a foreign intelligence agency.

    "All engineers had access. There was no logging of who went into the environment or what they did," Zatko asserted. "Nobody knew where data lived or whether it was critical, and all engineers had some form of critical access to the production environment."

Where do you stand on the wanton censorship by Big Tech Platforms, while retaining their Section 230 carveout indemnifying them for Slander /Defamation lawsuits and Copyright infringements?
  Big Tech Platforms have the right to Censor all speech providing they voluntarily relinquish their Section 230 Carveout.
  Big Tech Platforms DO NOT have the right to Censor any speech, while retaining multiple indemnifications by virtue of the Section 230 Carveout.
  I know nothing of this 230 talk, but "I do love me some social media".
398 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Since only about 20% of the News Media has any shred of Journalistic Integrity remaining: How does our Constitutional Republic continue without a "Free Press"?
  Demand real information, using real sources, backed up by facts.
  Promote real journalist entities only, and admonish those that prostitute their profession.
  We Democratic Socialists are doing just fine, thank-you, by promoting lies while having very little real knowledge about so much.
159 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

‘White Men Really Are Insufferable’: Jimmy Kimmel Blasted For Playing Dead During Black Creator’s Emmys Acceptance Speech Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Christian College Sued By Students, Staff Over LGBTQ Hiring Ban


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

As flagged by Barstool Sports, Qatar just pulled one of the greatest “bait-and-switches” of all times by pulling the plug on beer being sold at the stadium roughly 48 hours before the World Cup is set to kick off in the Islamic nation.
New evidence suggests that some of the people present at Jesus Christ's famous Sermon on the Mount had to sit in an overflow section on the eastern side of the mount where a large jumbotron screen had been set up.
Mike Rowe told Fox News this weekend that men are becoming soft and lazy in part due to how much time they are spending on screens instead of working.
Program-value and debt-to-income data are sufficient to protect the public interest.
The Biden administration asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on its student loan forgiveness plan on Friday and let the program resume.


It turned out that some services like speedy justice and border security were provided more efficiently under the Taliban than under Western-influenced bureaucracies.
The FBI has dispatched surveillance teams after several reports surfaced of Christian Nationalists planning to spend a day thanking God for His blessings and praying for America.
Democratic operatives are reviving a partisan watchdog group to “investigate the investigators” and hound House Republicans who are preparing congressional investigations into the Biden administration.
Attorney General Merrick Garland named Jack Smith, a former war-crimes prosecutor, on Friday as special counsel over two Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations into former President Donald Trump.
Local man Robert Thurdriftle took the day off work to tackle some of the 74 different things he had to do but, after puzzling about what to do first, eventually settled on doing nothing.
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), a fierce defender of American civil liberties, harshly confronted FBI Director Christopher Wray about the communication between social media companies and the FBI regarding social media users’ private information.


Law enforcement in the Bahamas revealed on Thursday that officials seized assets belonging to defunct cryptocurrency platform FTX and moved them to a government-controlled wallet for “safekeeping.”


Back to Top