Honoring the Oath | Eastern North Carolina Now

    On January 9, I spoke at the "Honor the Oath" Rally in Raleigh, NC, organized by the Carolina Liberty PAC and a former NC state legislator. That was the day that members of the NC General Assembly took their oath of office.

    The rally was intended to invite citizens to Raleigh to celebrate the start of the new legislative session, witness the swearing of the oath ceremony, talk to their legislators (especially about the health insurance exchange situation), and to listen to the remarks of various grassroots organization leaders, state representatives, Congressman Walter Jones, NC GOP chairman Robin Hayes, and concerned citizens. It was a beautiful day for an outside rally. In fact, it was a perfect day - warm and sunny, with free lemonade available for everyone. Everyone was happy and excited to come together, celebrate the occasion, and listen to one another profess their love and allegiance to the state of North Carolina and their commitment to honest and constitutional government.

    The following is the transcript to my remarks at the rally.

"Honor the Oath" Rally

    This afternoon, several groups have come together to celebrate the start of the new state legislature and to remind our elected officials to honor their oath. The rally was organized by the Liberty movement. Speakers include those from the Liberty Party, the Republican Party, the Tea Party, and the Tenth Amendment Center. I hope going forward we will all learn to appreciate each other's priorities and learn to work together - for the common good.

    All of our groups play an important role in the big picture. Republicans are the solid block that continues to provide the political power for conservative values. The Tea Party highlights and educates on constitutional violations. Liberty groups remind us that freedom is inextricably linked to a limited government. And the Tenth Amendment Center focuses on solutions. We are part of the beautiful pie that wants to reclaim America.

    It's a great honor to be here today to talk about the importance of honoring the Oath of Office.

    Like 2010, 2012 was another historic year where the people of North Carolina showed their determination to become active in their state government and help determine the direction of the state. First we became educated, because we know the one indispensible tool of good government is knowledge. (James Madison wrote that "a people who want to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.") Next, we identified disciplined conservative candidates, and then we put our personal lives on hold to work to get them elected. And most of them did. The historic election results speak to what we can accomplish when we educate and energize.

    But our determination to have our voice - our real voice - heard in government didn't end at the ballot box. Now we are up here to remind those who have been elected to make good on their promises and to honor their oaths.

    But make no mistake, we have no intention of blending back into the scenery or going away. There's too much work to be done.

    But for now, for today - this next step in representative government - the Oath of Office - is very important to us.

    The oath of office for members of the NC General Assembly and for Governor is required by the North Carolina state Constitution, in Article II, Section 12, and Article III, Section 4, respectively. [Re-affirmed in Article VI, Section 7]. For each office, the oath is very simple and actually represents 3 separate pledges. The first simply states that the Legislator or Governor will support the Constitution and laws of the United States. Secondly, he or she will support the Constitution and laws of North Carolina. And finally, he or she will faithfully perform the duties pertaining to the office. However, Chapter 11 of the NC General Statutes sets out in greater specificity the second part of the oath. It reads:

    "I, ___________, do solemnly and sincerely swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States; that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of North Carolina, and to the constitutional powers and authorities which are or may be established for the government thereof; and that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the Constitution of said State, not inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States, to the best of my knowledge and ability; so help me God." (§ 11-7).

    What happens - symbolically - when a representative takes his or her oath of office? It ceremonially transfers the sovereign powers of We the People to that representative so that he or she can govern on behalf of us. It is a transition of power, all the while forcing that representative to solemnly promise to abide by the limits of that power, as set out in both Constitutions. It reminds the representative that he is a servant of the people and not an agent of the government. He is an agent of the People.

    The oath of office for representatives and the Governor are examples of promissory oaths. The oath is a declaration of intent, invoking the name of God so that He may witness that promise. As Chapter 11 of our NC General Statutes explains, it is a solemn appeal to Almighty God, as the omniscient witness of truth and the just and supreme avenger of falsehood. It is a religious act by which the representative invokes God not only to witness the truth and sincerity of his promise but also to avenge his imposture or violated faith. In other words, the oath-taker invites God to take notice of any breach, should that happen, and punish him as he sees fit.

    Oaths are given and taken so seriously and solemnly because they are crucial to the end of good and honest government.

    And the end of good government, as we know, is the protection of individual liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Constitutions protect us from government. That is their purpose. They set boundaries. They define the relationship between the government and the individual. A Constitution is the "People's Document."

    Likewise, a representative is a servant of the people. And it is an awesome power that he is given to govern on our behalf. But Spiderman taught us a very important lesson: "With great power comes great responsibility."

    We want our representatives to use their power responsibly...and constitutionally.

    As we know, Constitutions are based on certain bedrock American principles and one key principle is government restraint. After all, the American experiment can be summed up in one simple equation: "Limited Government = Maximum Liberty." In fact, one of the features of our Constitution - the Bill of Rights - was incorporated as a specific check on government power.

    But a Bill of Rights was a constitutional feature even before the US Constitution. It originated with the states. Virginia was the first to enact a constitution that was prefaced with a formal "Bill of Rights." That was June 2, 1776 and it was written by George Mason. It was called the Virginia Declaration of Rights. Not only would this crucial charter of freedom serve as the inspiration for Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence, but it also served as a template for all the other states, including North Carolina.
Thomas Jefferson: Above.
    When Jefferson's Declaration of Independence was adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776 and when North Carolina received the news that the colonies had formally declared their independence from Great Britain, one of the first things she did was to write a constitution. And in that first constitution, state legislators incorporated 25 guarantees of personal freedom so that the constitution would complement the Declaration of Independence. Most of those guarantees are still in the current state constitution. They are the NC Declaration of Rights.

    A Bill of Rights is a statement of sovereignty. It is not an agreement, a contract or a conditional grant. It is a statement of common Natural Law. It acknowledges that all men are born equally free and independent, and have certain inherent and natural rights - to life, liberty, property, security, and to resist oppression. It memorializes the notion that individuals cannot, by any compact, Constitution, government, or government action, be deprived or divested of those rights.

    The US Bill of Rights was meant to prevent a repeat of the abuses that compelled our forefathers to take up arms against Great Britain. It was meant as a shield to protect the people against tyranny, so that the sacrifices and bloodshed by our forefathers would not be in vain.

    The Bill of Rights is particularly significant to North Carolina. Without the Bill of Rights, North Carolina would have never ratified and joined the Union. The Bill of Rights was the states' answer to the question: "How can we prevent the encroachments of government?" When James Madison submitted his proposed draft of the Bill of Rights to the First Congress in July 1789 so they could adopt it and send it on to the States for ratification, he delivered a speech to explain them. As he explained: "The particular amendments comprising the Bill of Rights were crafted to "limit and qualify the powers of government."

    It was not individual freedom that the states wanted. That's not what North Carolina wanted. After all, under the American system, all men were created with inalienable rights that come from our Creator and not government. No, our Founders and state leaders wanted freedom from government.

    The Bill of Rights doesn't grant rights. Rather, it recognizes rights. It requires that the government not interfere with those rights. In other words, our Founders and state leaders wanted constitutional liberty. They figured if such limitations were incorporated into the Constitution, courts will be especially protective of those rights and will safeguard them against every attempt by the government to violate them. Well, that's what states like North Carolina and Virginia and others hoped for. It was a hopeful plan.

    The fact is that the plan was not the brainchild of the Federalists, who won the day at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. It wasn't the brainchild of James Madison, initially an avowed Nationalist. The Constitution was amended by the States because of the influence of the anti-Federalists - the ones who wrote volumes to criticize the proposed Constitution for concentrating too much power in a central government.

    North Carolina ultimately embraced the anti-Federalist position. She wanted a Union of states and not states United. One anti-federalist, the Centinel, reminded those who had to consider the merits of the Constitution that republican governments only work well and are successful in relatively small territories. And so the Centinel warned: "It is not practical to establish and maintain one government on the principles of freedom in so extensive a territory. The only plausible system by which so extensive a country can be governed consistent with freedom is a confederation - or federation - of republics, possessing all the powers of internal government and united in the management of their general and foreign concerns...." In other words, a Union of independent republics. A Union of Sovereign States.

    Another anti-Federalist, Nathaniel Ames, of Massachusetts, wrote: "The state governments represent the wishes and feelings of the people. They are the safeguards of our liberties - they will afford a shelter against the abuse of power, and will be the natural avengers of our violated rights." Patrick Henry of Virginia, himself a strong anti-Federalist, agreed. He referred to the proposed government under the new Constitution, without a Bill of Rights, as a "consolidated and a dangerous" one. He said: "The States are the character and soul of our federation."

    Taken together, the anti-Federalists concluded that the United States could only exist successfully as a nation if "distinct republics connected under a federal head. The state governments must be the principal guardians of the peoples' rights.... In them must rest the balance of government."

    And so the States demanded a Bill of Rights or they would not adopt the Constitution and form a Union. Many sent a set of proposed amendments from their ratification conventions, including drafts for the 9th and 10th amendments. North Carolina proposed 20 amendments.

    In the end, the Bill of Rights was adopted to further limit the power of government. In the end, the ant-Federalists won the day. North Carolina got her way.

    If there is ever any doubt as to the intent of the Bill of Rights, we need only consult its Preamble: The Preamble to the Bill of Rights says that the states adopted the set of amendments expressly in order to prevent any misconstruction or abuse of government powers. In fact, the Preamble calls the amendments "Restrictive clauses." The Bill of Rights supersedes all other parts of our Constitution and restricts the powers delegated under the Constitution to the government. While amendments one through eight (1-8) have some historical context, stemming almost verbatim from various British compacts/charters, the Ninth and Tenth Amendments are uniquely American.

    North Carolina's Declaration of Rights is found in the first section of her constitution, in Article I. It declares and protects the rights and interests of its citizens, even though minimum protection is already afforded by the US Constitution. And that minimum protection is being eroded. Washington DC too often uses a skewed perspective. Instead of asking: "Are citizen's rights being violated by this law?" government asks: "Is the violation of citizen's rights justified because of an important government objective?" And too often the answer all three branches give us is "yes." When our rights get in the way of a government objective, we lose. We lose the very reason we need the government in the first place. Government has too many objectives, including unconstitutional ones.

    Taking note of what is going on at the federal level, we have to be reminded that part of our state representative's oath is to support the US Constitution. As a citizen who wants her God-given rights protected, I urge our representatives NOT to take the skewed approach of Washington DC and ask the proper question: "Are citizens' rights being violated by the particular federal law." And if they are, the oath would require them not to support that piece of legislation.

    I stand here to ask our leaders to Honor their Oath as a Republican Woman, as a Tea Party leader, as the Deputy Director of the NC Tenth Amendment Center, and as an ordinary citizen.

    As a Republican Woman, I know that government is best when it governs least. I know that government is best when it is closest to the people and NOT controlled by an intellectual elite that is centered in the far-distant capitol of Washington DC. I have confidence that people can plan their lives better than the government can plan them. I have more faith in human beings than the government does.

    As a Republican Woman, I know that too many laws can destroy liberty just as effectively as having no laws to protect it at all. I also know that religion and marriage and other conservative institutions are crucial to society. Like moral virtue, responsibility is first learned within the family and in the home, often by children imprinting on their parents. Only a people who are moral, religious, and righteous require limited government. And only such people can be trusted with a representative government.

    As a Republican Woman, I know that the US Constitution is an agreement, signed by the States, on behalf of We the People, and it must be interpreted according to the spirit and intent under which it was signed. What it meant in 1787 and in 1791, when the states signed it, is what it means today. Can you imagine a reasonable person entering into an agreement of significant consequence without knowing how that agreement will be changed or interpreted in the future? No party would enter into such an agreement - especially with such enormous consequences as the States did in 1787.

    As a Tea Party leader, I believe in a return to constitutional, limited government. I know that government has allowed itself for too long to be the sole arbiter of its own power and we are seeing the consequences of that abuse of power. I know that government will never recognize their abuses and will continue to look for more ways to consolidate their power and extend their reach. I know that the only way that power will ever be returned to the states and to the people is through the engagement of people like you and me who want to keep the dream alive - the American dream. Patrick Henry, in front of the Virginia Ratifying Convention on June 5, 1788, called Liberty the greatest of all earthly blessings. He said "Give us that precious jewel, and you may take everything else!"

    As a Tea Party leader, I recognize that history is repeating itself, and once again, a free people is engaged in the endless struggle between good and evil, between liberty and tyranny. Just like colonial times when a group of liberty-minded folks - the Sons of Liberty - emerged to remind the people of this struggle, the modern-day TEA party and other Liberty-minded groups have emerged to do the same thing. And like the Sons of Liberty, which started out as a small group of "agitators" in the several colonies, the Tea Party and other Liberty-minded groups are growing in number as well. [Don't believe what the main stream media says!]

    After November's election and the results at the national level, I had to remind myself why I got involved in the Tea Party movement. We all remember when the Tea Party started back in 2009. CNBC correspondent Rick Santelli was on the floor of the Chicago exchange when he went off in a tirade over the government's stimulus plan and bailouts. He said it wasn't the government's job to use taxpayer money to keep people in their homes when they couldn't afford those homes in the first place. He was lashing out at a government which was expanding into areas it had no business being in, especially when its actions were going against the very nature of free markets. He called for a Chicago Tea Party. His rant was contagious. It touched a nerve... sort of like when the colonists protested the King over "No Taxation Without Representation." Santelli's use of the term "Tea Party" reminded us of a time when ordinary citizens stood up for their rights - peacefully - against a government that was growing intolerant of those rights.

    That's why I joined the Tea Party. What keeps me loyal to the party is the history of this state, which is reflected proudly on our state flag. The flag has 2 dates on it - May 20, 1775 and April 12, 1776. The first honors the signing of the Mecklenburg Declaration of Independence and the second honors the signing of the Halifax Resolves. On May 20, 1775, Mecklenburg, NC was the first government body in America to declare independence from the Crown of England. This document preceded Jefferson's Declaration of Independence.