Russia Balks As G7, European Union Implement Oil Price Cap | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Ben Zeisloft.

    G7 countries, the European Union, and Australia committed on Friday to implementing a global $60 per barrel price cap on seaborne crude oil from Russia beginning on Monday.

    Members of the G7, which include Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, announced the proposed move earlier this year. A statement from the U.S. Treasury Department announced that the initiative will "maintain the supply of Russian oil to the global market" while reducing revenues for the nation, which is currently invading Ukraine.

    "This price cap will benefit directly emerging and developing economies, and it will be adjustable over time so that we can react to market developments," European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a recent speech.

    The price cap will only allow the maritime services industry, which includes sectors such as insurance and trade finance, to provide their services for Russian oil sold below $60 per barrel. Brent crude oil, the leading global price benchmark for crude oil drilled in the Atlantic Ocean, is approximately $83 per barrel as of Monday.

    The Treasury Department argued that the level of the price cap is "high enough to maintain a clear economic incentive for Russia to continue selling oil on global markets," as Russia has "historically accepted" the rate. In order to spurn the price cap, Russia would have to rely upon service providers outside of the G7, which are more expensive and less reliable.

    Russian officials, however, balked at the proposal. Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that the nation "won't accept the price cap" in a statement provided to government-run news outlet TASS. Mikhail Ulyanov, the nation's ambassador to international organizations in Vienna, said that Europe will live without Russian oil "starting from this year," predicting that the European Union would accuse Russia of "using oil as a weapon."

    European officials have indeed argued that Russia is responsible for a precipitous rise in energy prices. The country paused natural gas shipments through Nord Stream 1 before the entire pipeline system was destroyed by an unknown actor. Some commentators have noted that a rapid transition away from fossil fuels among European Union nations, which adopted the official policy of becoming "a climate-neutral society" by 2050 in accordance with the European Green Deal, has contributed to unreliable energy supplies.

    "Russia keeps on actively manipulating our energy market," von der Leyen remarked in September, noting that natural gas prices have recently increased more than tenfold. "But Europeans are also coping courageously with this."

    Multiple European countries are imposing regulations for thermostat and appliance usage; von der Leyen suggested that European Union member states reap windfall profits from fossil fuel producers. "In our social market economy, profits are good," she continued. "But in these times it is wrong to receive extraordinary record profits benefitting from war and on the back of consumers. In these times, profits must be shared and channeled to those who need it the most."

    NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has also characterized Russian restrictions on fuel exports as "blackmail." The former prime minister of Norway suggested that achieving victory for Ukraine would help Europe to "break free" from Russian energy.

poll#169
Considering how abjectly corrupt and civilly abusive the Left has become regarding the corrosive effect of their elected leaders; their entrenched and ruling bureaucracy; employing their failed Education Industry as Indoctrinators; their collusive private sector operators, such as the terminally discredited Legacy Media and Big Tech censorship of Free Speech: What will be the best course forward for hardworking Middle Americans, including the Patriot Class?
  Withdraw from society, go underground and plan for a resurgence when it is feasible to do so.
  Work within the confines of better policy by the People's government, once good sense and sanity is restored in the electorate at large, to achieve such.
  Are you a crazy, nut-job Insurrectionist? Everything is perfect within our plan to achieve our intended goals for the Socialist Left.
  Secession to form a true Constitutional Republic.
437 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Mitch McConnell still colluding with Democrats on MSM media subsidy Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Facebook Owner Meta Could Remove News From The Platform If Congress Passes Controversial Bill


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

this at the time that pro-Hamas radicals are rioting around the country
populist / nationalist anti-immigration AfD most popular party among young voters, CDU second

HbAD1

Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD2

Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top