State Supreme Court will review suit over removal of Asheville monument | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    The N.C. Supreme Court has agreed to take up the case of a dispute over removal of a Confederate monument in Asheville. In orders issued Friday, the court blocked an April ruling from the state Appeals Court and agreed to review the case.

    The orders signed by Justice Phil Berger Jr. offered no explanation for the decision. Plaintiffs in the case had filed paperwork in April seeking a review from North Carolina's highest court.

    A three-judge panel of the N.C. Court of Appeals ruled April 5 in favor of the City of Asheville in a lawsuit brought by a historic preservation group over the city's work to remove the Zebulon Vance Monument in the city's Pack Square Park.

    Judges John Arrowood, Donna Stroud, and April Wood upheld a lower court decision that the Society for the Historical Preservation of the 26th North Carolina Troops, Inc. did not prove that the city breached its contract with the group when it dismantled the monument.

    The plaintiffs raised more than $115,000 over three years to pay for the monument's restoration in 2015. They produced a donation agreement in which the city agreed to take the group's donation to pay for the work. Six years later, in May 2021, Asheville City Council voted to remove the monument.

    "Nowhere in the donation agreement did defendant City grant any ownership rights in the Vance Monument to plaintiff," Arrowood wrote for the court. "The Donation Agreement specifically contemplated a limited scope and duration. As defendant City aptly puts it, plaintiff's complaint seeks 'to read into the Donation Agreement a fifth obligation with which the City would be required to comply: maintaining the Vance Monument in place for all eternity.'"

    Work to remove the monument was halted back in June by the Court of Appeals as it undertook consideration of the plaintiffs' arguments. It has remained a worksite, with just the bottom of the monument intact surrounded by stones, after Asheville and Buncombe County were ordered to immediately halt removal and retain all pieces of the monument until a decision was issued.

    The plaintiffs argued that in taking their donation to restore the monument the city was creating a long-term agreement, beyond the restoration, and removing the monument was a breach of that contract. The court disagreed.

    "None of these arguments establish a legal injury suffered by plaintiff sufficient to establish standing," Arrowood wrote. "Although plaintiff has filed a Petition with the Historical Commission, the Petition taken together with defendant City's decision to remove the Vance Monument do not legally injure plaintiff. The Petition is a matter for the Historical Commission to consider and is not before the trial court or this Court."

    The monument was erected in 1887 in recognition of Civil War colonel, N.C. governor, U.S. senator, and Buncombe County native Zebulon B. Vance, who later died in 1894. The 2015 restoration funded by the Society for the Historical Preservation of the 26th North Carolina Troops included cleaning and repairing the monument, but also removing a time capsule that contained the Colored Enterprise newspaper from 1887. No other known copy of this African American newspaper from Asheville during that time has survived. When the monument was rededicated in 2015, a new time capsule was installed in the cornerstone to commemorate the history and culture of Asheville. It was supposed to be opened in 2115.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comment

( January 9th, 2023 @ 8:00 am )
 
The Sanctuary County of Buncombe has a need to revise history; who would have ever thought?



Coach Dave: I am homo-nauseous Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics State Supreme Court rejects lawsuit over hog farm rules


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.
Democrats prosecuting political opponets just like foreign dictrators do
populist / nationalist / sovereigntist right are kingmakers for new government
18 year old boy who thinks he is girl planned to shoot up elementary school in Maryland
Biden assault on democracy continues to build as he ramps up dictatorship
One would think that the former Attorney General would have known better
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
UNC board committee votes unanimously to end DEI in UNC system

HbAD1

Police in the nation’s capital are not stopping illegal aliens who are driving around without license plates, according to a new report.
Davidaon County student suspended for using correct legal term for those in country illegally
Lawmakers and privacy experts on both sides of the political spectrum are sounding the alarm on a provision in a spy powers reform bill that one senator described as one of the “most terrifying expansions of government surveillance” in history
given to illegals in Mexico before they even get to US: NGOs connected to Mayorkas
committee gets enough valid signatures to force vote on removing Oakland, CA's Soros DA
other pro-terrorist protests in Chicago shout "Death to America" in Farsi

HbAD2

 
Back to Top