By L.A. Williams
Christian Action League
January 10, 2024
The word “husband” appears in 104 verses in the Bible, showing up in 29 books; the word “wife,” a whopping 360 verses in 38 books. But don’t tell leaders of the Methodist Church in the United Kingdom. They may get offended.
The denomination that just over two years ago began embracing same-sex unions and recognizing cohabitating couples has announced that words like “husband” and “wife” are not to be used in the church because they express what is “not the reality for many people.”
And did we say “embracing?” Oops, that’s a bad word too, according to the group’s new “Inclusive Language Guide.” It says the term “embrace” could trigger people who have experienced intimate abuse. Instead, it suggests using “surrounded by.”
“Were this kind of bizarre rule-making in the name of inclusivity not so harmful, it would truly be funny,” says the Rev. Mark Creech, executive director of the Christian Action League. “But words do matter, and words like husband and wife refer to one gender or the other because, like it or not, God made two genders.”
He referenced Genesis 2:24, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh,” as the first of more than 400 verses that include one of the two words. Not to mention the very specific roles of husbands and wives laid out by the Apostle Paul in Ephesians.
Nonetheless, the 11-page Methodist guide, released last month, urges the church to ditch “husband” and “wife” and instead call people “partners.” It also recommends “parent” and “child,” since, we’re guessing, it goes without saying that no one should be referred to as “mother” or “father.” Another Methodist-approved word: “carer” to describe a primary care-giver of a child.
The guide, which points users to LGBT organizations among other groups, for more direction, asserts that “Good, open, encouraging conversations, based on careful listening, are central to all positive relationships.”
“Interesting how the emphasis is all about relationships, but no one is supposed to use words that describe how anyone is related,” Creech says. “What’s next? The church shouldn’t present the gospel? Of course, the gospel offends those who don’t have a relationship with Christ. Unless we become aware that we are separated from God, we won’t see a need to seek reconciliation through a savior.”
A representative for the Methodist denomination told The Christian Post that it is possible for couples getting married in the church to have gendered language used in their marriage ceremonies. They can discuss the matter of how they wish to be referred to with their minister, the spokesperson said.
Father Calvin Robinson, known for his stand against progressivism in the Church of England, did not mince words in his response to the Methodist language guide.
“This is not Christianity,” Robinson wrote on social media. “It is Critical Theories: ‘smash heteronormativity.’ It is no longer enough to acknowledge disordered lifestyles. Everything normative and ordered must be demolished for fear of causing offense.”
“Critical Theories is neo-Marxism. It is a communist ideology, antithetical to the Christian faith. It is not possible to be a communist *and* a Christian. One must make a choice. Embrace the ways of this trendy yet toxic ideology, or embrace God’s order,” he wrote, urging the Methodist Church to choose one or the other.
The dictionary. And you want to be my latex salesman.
Idiots. |
I agree Stan and one of their main goals is that the public believes our government is in fact a democracy when it is not. They would like voting in America to be like voting for America’s Got Talent. Text it in, whoever gets the most texts wins. No verification of citizenship required. Why?
In order to be a citizen of an area, the said area would have to have a defined, enforced border; which we do not. |
Then that makes total sense Will.
Leftists like to believe that they are educated to a point that they have a true command of the English language, which now is morphing into some Orwellian projection of Dystopia if one does their insipid lead on issues that they could never understand at their core. One must be careful of the Non Patriot Left's true intentions when it comes to words. |
I believe this is what Bob was referring to.
www.washingtonpost.com This post says they were pulled for review along with other books to make sure they dont contain these “redefined” words I assume. |
Big Bob: You have no proof that anyone banned a real dictionary in any public school, other than what is communicated to you to parrot.
In this post published on this platform, no dictionary is mentioned, and you offered no real information about what dictionary was banned ... there are many. |
Voters should just remember which group banned a dictionary. Enough said.
MAGA- beyond stupid |
Nope, it is the "woke" who are dopes. It takes a special kind of stupid to believe the nonsense that y'all do.
|
Dude, you're a dope.
|
There are apparently a dictionary or two which have included the made up ideological words of the "woke" left as if they were real words. That would make them woke. The solution is simply to use other dictionaries or earlier editions without those made up words.
|
A woke dictionary.
MAGA-completely un fit to govern |
Thank you and indeed I’m aware that there are attacks on books coming from red and blue.
|
Texas National Guard seizes Eagle Pass border post, kicks out Border Patrol | Rev. Mark Creech, Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics | 2024, Our only hope |
The attack on words and word meanings as well as inventing words is one of the most diabolical attacks on civilization ever devised.